- Advanced Futures Trading Strategies - Robert Carver

Channel
Books - Make India Read
@BooksMakeIndiaRead
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
17,454subscribers
+110 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001191822295 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BooksMakeIndiaRead |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BooksMakeIndiaRead |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 04:58 | 17,454 | +14 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 10:42 | 17,440 | +46 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 02:41 | 17,394 | -1 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 03:01 | 17,395 | +4 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 11:36 | 17,391 | -1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 15:40 | 17,392 | -1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 02:18 | 17,393 | +65 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 21:41 | 17,328 | -3 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 19:18 | 17,331 | +2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 13:14 | 17,329 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:08 | 17,331 | -10 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:34 | 17,341 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:27 | 17,342 | +7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:02 | 17,335 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:53 | 17,337 | -9 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:18 | 17,346 | +2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 17,344 | -6 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 03:05 | 17,350 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 17,352 | -4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 17,356 | first reading |
Engagement
199 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 199 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
27 reactions across 22 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 96.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 26 | 96.3% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 3.70% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 199 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 199 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
File, posted without a caption
Follow this link to join my WhatsApp group: https://chat.whatsapp.com/KO9jPR5BXR01gl9vzHkO4l?s=sw&p=a&mlu=4 Join this group for Real time updates on India stock market & Indepth research on Indian Stock markets.
https://chat.whatsapp.com/Eyo8U7p5t6KKNsOzSPr9D9?s=cl&p=a&mlu=4 Last few slots left. Add your friends or family who have the same interest. Group for Technical Analysis & Volume Analysis
DARK PSYCHOLOGY
File, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
Beating the market: An Introduction to Investing in: Bonds, Stocks, Crypto
❤1
📢Note:- Today is the last day for subscription till 6pm after that admins will not accept any monthly payments for SEPTEMBER month. Anyone who subscribes for Quarterly or Yearly will receive a Special Gift Hamper.
Greetings of the Day to all members and colleagues. Markets are witnessing sharp volatility, making Intraday and F&O trading increasingly risky. Stay ahead with expert market views by joining or renewing your Market Wizard Premium Membership. 📌 *SEPTEMBER Membership Bookings Open (First Come, First Serve)* ✅ Pay between *14th–23rd AUGUST* and get added on the evening of 23rd AUGUST, along with 1 week of extra prem…
❤2
*📌 Market Wizard Premium Membership – Payment Details* You may make the membership payment through Bank Transfer, Google Pay, or UPI using the details below: 🏦 State Bank of India Name: Urvika Alpesh Shah A/C No.: 39198960578 IFSC: SBIN0000552 Branch: Chincholi, Malad West 📱 Google Pay: 8097822304 💳 UPI ID: urvikashah219@oksbi ✅ After making the payment, kindly share the payment screenshot along with your Name a…
📌 Steps to Join/Renew Market Wizard Premium Membership 1️⃣ Fill the registration form carefully with accurate details and provide your consent: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSed5g8JiIGlttu3IUlkJwnCdEMzv-1Z_hr3ylfU55pepmCb6A/viewform?usp=sf_link 2️⃣ Pay the monthly membership fee of ₹3,000 via Google Pay or Bank Transfer (payment details available in the form). 3️⃣ Send the payment screenshot along with …
Showing the 12 most recent of 199 posts we hold for @BooksMakeIndiaRead. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@BooksMakeIndiaRead named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 5 posts, 9 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 5 posts, 9 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@btsreports · 21,272
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 24 September 2026
@researchreportss · 65,440
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 21 August 2026
@TechnoFunda_Investing · 52,680
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
@All_Editorials_pdf · 32,923
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 5 September 2026
@fundamental3 · 45,116
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 August 2026
@BeatTheStreetnews · 26,710
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 September 2026
@CFAL1_FREE · 36,448
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 8 September 2026
@CFAL012025 · 28,308
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 10 September 2026
@GtopGJ · 61,764
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 22 August 2026
@Brokerage_report · 23,378
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 September 2026
@Daily_News_E_Papers_PDFS · 220,406
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 11 August 2026
@stockedgeapp · 28,583
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
@stockupdate9 · 47,634
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
@wealthcreator7 · 40,513
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 August 2026
@CSEUPSCPrelims · 56,403
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 23 August 2026
@PoliticalScience_Notes · 27,860
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 September 2026
@multibaggers_valuepicks · 40,230
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 29 August 2026
@niveyshak1 · 31,595
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 6 September 2026
@stocksip · 21,440
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 September 2026
@SSEIDirect · 29,088
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 September 2026
@ndtvprofitnews · 48,219
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 26 August 2026
@indianstockmarketteam · 26,766
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 September 2026
This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Books - Make India Read” (@BooksMakeIndiaRead), 17,454 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BooksMakeIndiaRead.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.