Channel
@Book_Art_Life
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,786subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001177366986 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Book_Art_Life |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Book_Art_Life |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:36 | 1,786 | +2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:08 | 1,784 | -2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:15 | 1,786 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:36 | 1,788 | -7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:35 | 1,795 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:10 | 1,793 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:47 | 1,795 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:21 | 1,795 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (4 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,491 |
| Reactions total | 98 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
98 reactions across 16 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 87 | 88.8% | |
| 💔 | 11 | 11.2% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 98reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
I used to think that if you photographed someone, you'd never lose them, But now I realize it's the other way around. Our photographs show us everything we've lost. Tony Parsons, Husband and Wife قبلاً فکر میکردم اگر از کسی عکس بگیری، دیگر هرگز او را از دست نمیدهی. اما حالا متوجه شدهام که قضیه برعکس است. عکسهای ما هر آنچه را که از دست دادهایم به ما نشان میدهند. تونی پارسونز کتاب: زن و شوهر
❤4
○ Andy Warhol (1928-1987)
❤4
I dyed my hair gray when I was 23 or 24. I thought the problems of old people are easier to deal with than the problems of young people. So I decided to go gray so no one would know how old I was. I thought I'd gain a lot by going gray: (1) I'd have the problems of old people, which would be easier to deal with; (2) everyone would be amazed at how young I looked; (3) I'd be freed from the obligation to act like a you…
❤4
○ Andy Warhol ○ Portrait of Sonia Rykiel, 1986
❤5
Rykiel (the famous French couturier) recalled this work: When I arrived in New York, I was introduced to Warhol. He seemed to like the color of my hair. He took hundreds of Polaroids while I posed for him for four hours or so. And then this work appeared. I thought Warhol would give it to me as a gift, but he demanded a high price, and the purchase fell through. However, after the artist's death, I received the portr…
❤3
Album: AM (Indonesia) Instrumental Cinematic Progressive-Rock Post-Rock Art-Rock @Book_Art_Life The whole world is made of limitations, So that happiness doesn't drive you crazy! کل جهان از محدودیتها ساخته شده است، تا از خوشبختی دیوانه نشویم!
❤5
I've seen it all, I've lived through it all. But the main thing is that I hate this time, it makes me sick... Everything is fake, all feelings are hurt, there's no respect left in the world, no ability to keep one's word, only money matters, all you hear about is crime 24/7. Alain Delon من همهچیز را دیدهام، همهچیز را تجربه کردهام. اما مهمترین چیز این است که من از این دوران متنفرم، از آن احساس تهوع میکنم... همه…
💔4❤3
To believe in the true sense is to feel one's connection with the Universe and its events, to feel needed from eternity to eternity, to accept one's life as a path of affirmation, accomplished in the events of each day, as an eternal present. Thus, only a hero is capable of true faith. The people of the present era are no good: stillborn and worthless, they have no destiny. Hans Günther باور کردن، به معنای واقعی کل…
💔4❤2
One of the most horrific paintings in Russian history, "Ivan the Terrible and His Son Ivan, November 16, 1581," depicts a moment of despair: the tsar has just killed his son and realizes it. Ivan's face is contorted with horror, and his hands are covered in blood. Repin painted this canvas in 1885, but it terrified even tsars. Alexander III forbade its exhibition, and in 1913, the painting was vandalized by icon pain…
❤7
Ivan the Terrible and His Son Ivan, 1885 Artist: Ilya Repin (birthday 5.08.1844)
❤7
For so many years he lived like everyone else, ate, laughed, hoped for something, loved someone. And now it's all over for him, over forever. This is life! Just a few days, and then—emptiness! You're born, you grow, you're happy, you wait for something, then you die. Whoever you are—man or woman—farewell, you will never return to earth! And yet, each of us carries within us a feverish and insatiable thirst for immort…
❤8💔3
Photo, posted without a caption
❤9
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @Book_Art_Life. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 711,451 of 1,620,455entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“| Book | Art | Life |” (@Book_Art_Life), 1,786 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Book_Art_Life.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.