Channel
@BookPavuk
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
48subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001933272586 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BookPavuk |
| Description | Всем привет) Уголок писателя и его помощника Капуча |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BookPavuk |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 48 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:46 | 48 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 16 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (16 April 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 134 |
| Reactions total | 45 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 12:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
165 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 106 | 64.2% | |
| 🔥 | 29 | 17.6% | |
| 🦄 | 12 | 7.27% | |
| 👀 | 5 | 3.03% | |
| 🫡 | 5 | 3.03% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 1.82% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 1.82% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.21% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 165reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 16 April 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🪽✨✨✨✨ ✨✨✨✨✨✨🪽 Я все еще читаю книги из "Охотников за произведениями". Скажу без утайки, сложно у меня идёт процесс. Похожу, я отвыкла от чтения совсем - порой приходится прям напрячь пятую точку и сесть читать. Буду рада, если вы поделитесь советами, как вернуться к чтению. А за это время я стала гордой mommy этой вязаной летучей мышки. Связала ее где-то за два дня, и я прям в восторге. Может даже во время отдыха…
❤6🔥2👍1
🌻🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🌻 Паучата, я сказала что связала кардиган, но не показала его. Так что исправляюсь✨ Вообще я нашла такие кардиганы в пинтересте и поняла, что больше не могу ждать. В феврале на мой др подарили пряжу (забегая наперед скажу, что той пряжи оказалось недостаточно). И скажу честно, до этого я не умела вязать крючком.. До этого я вязала руками из пряжи Alize Puffy. То есть это моя первая работа в вязании…
🔥6❤5👍2
🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Как уже говорила почти месяц назад, я записалась на фестиваль "Охотники за произведениями", и сейчас читаю эти книги. Если кто-то их читал, то хочу услышать ваше мнение о них) Дело в том, что я практически год пыталась вернуться к чтению. Честно, не выходило, порой прям тошнило от всего этого – поэтому я прикрыла на время актив с "Авторами, вперед". Но сейчас, набравшись силами, я решила взять попу в р…
❤7🔥6👏2
🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Паучата, я тут из своего отпуска вернулась. Так вышло, что конец учебного года дался прям с натяжкой. Вы бы видели, как я целую неделю готовилась к экзаменам, только ради того, чтобы посидеть 5 минут, ответить и пойти домой. Как говорится, Лизе сказали сиять, и она сияла. Но вот после этого пошел жуткий отходняк. Мой распорядок дня был похож на день сурка: сон фильмы и... Вязание. Я довязала свой к…
❤4👀2🔥2
Как думаете, какую книгу решила туда бросить?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🦄1
🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Всем привет, паучата) Наконец-то решилась выйти из своей норы, чтобы поучаствовать в одном интересном мероприятии, а именно на литературном фестивале "Охотники за произведениями". Есть ли тут ещё паучата, которые решили принять там участие тоже?) пишите в комментариях🤩 И с какой же книгой я вышла туда?
❤6🦄2
🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Сегодня, у нас на календаре 15 мая, а это значит что? Правильно, поздравления одного милого человечка) Рейтерн, поздравляю тебя с Днём рождения! Ты умеешь оживлять любую тему – будь то стихия или тонкие чувства героев. Желаю тебе, чтобы в твоей полной приключений жизни всегда было достаточно тихих, солнечных дней для вдохновения, но иногда – и лёгкого ветра перемен, чтобы сюжеты неслись, как Гр…
❤8🦄3
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 Вчера мне пришлось быть на прощании с достаточно важным для меня человеком. Этим человеком является моя классная руководительница, а которой я заканчивала старшие классы. Очень часто говорят, что из школы обычно самые теплые воспоминания связаны с теми учителями, которым было не все равно. Так вот, Маргарита Сергеевна была этим человеком – она мне дала вдохновение писать книги, а потом и дала …
❤10🫡5🙏3
Так вот, о хорошем. 1) решила поехать снова в лагерь, так что во вторую половину июля ожидайте от меня фоток с лагеря и новых историй 2) примерно последние полгода у меня настрой был не очень. Но за эту неделю стало гораздо лучше 3) написала несколько литературных статей, чем очень горжусь 4) вернулась к изучению насекомых, так что возможно скоро вернусь к Диколесью 5) бросила программирование. Честно, паучата, …
❤6👀3🔥2
🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 Паучата, понимаю, пропала прям надолго, но того требовали обстоятельства. Знаете, за месяц у меня очень много произошло. Как хорошо, так и, к сожалению, плохого. За это время я практически ничего нового не написала, не прочитала, но... Знаете, возможно, я плохой писатель (или его подобие), но все равно. Но обо всем по порядку. Вопрос дня: 🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤 🔤🔤🔤❓
❤8
С Днем победы, паучата
❤7🔥5🦄1
🤩 🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
❤14
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @BookPavuk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как думаете, какую книгу решила туда бросить?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Может попробовать устроить совместные чтения Парфюмера?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 16 April 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 948,686 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“📚🕸Паучьи россказни🕸📚” (@BookPavuk), 48 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BookPavuk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.