Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Денисюк Андрей

Channel

Денисюк Андрей

@BonusPlusStart

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

143subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002403154868
TypeChannel
Username@BonusPlusStart
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/BonusPlusStart

Growth

143148145.57 August 2026 — 147 subscribers8 August 2026 — 147 subscribers15 August 2026 — 148 subscribers24 August 2026 — 143 subscribers7 August 202624 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 17 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 142–149 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 08:36143-5
15 Aug 2026, 17:51148+1
8 Aug 2026, 20:31147no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:14147first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 17 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
42s
Average length
42s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

110 reactions across 14 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3733.6%
3330.0%
👍1614.5%
💔54.55%
👏43.64%
32.73%
🤩32.73%
🎄21.82%
🎉21.82%
🤝21.82%
❤‍🔥10.909%
👌10.909%
💯10.909%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 110reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 17 October 2025 to 3 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Apr 2026, 09:30 UTC109 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @bonusplus_officialPhoto

📈RFM — три буквы, которые изменят вашу выручку В рознице маркетинговый бюджет не резиновый, и тратить его на «случайных» покупателей — непозволительная роскошь. Намного выгоднее вложиться в те 20% лояльных клиентов, которые приносят 80% всей выручки. Почему так? 🤔 Все просто, потому что работает закон Парето. Небольшая группа постоянных покупателей делает основную кассу, а удерживать «своих» в 5–7 раз дешевле, чем

2💯1🔥1

30 Mar 2026, 09:06 UTC73 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Привет. Очень полезный контент!

🤝2

30 Mar 2026, 09:06 UTC114 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @bonusplus_officialPhoto

⚡️БИТВА РАССЫЛОК: Почему одна даёт 40% конверсии, а другая 0%? В маркетинге нет магии, а разница между 40% и 0% не в удаче, а в том, попали вы в боли аудитории или нет. Делимся реальными кейсами БонусПлюс: от триумфа до провала. Читайте честный разбор и учитесь на чужих ошибках, чтобы не платить за свои.👇 ✅ ЛУЧШИЕ РАССЫЛКИ 1. Telegram: Магазин табака и вейпов «Ну что, тигры, дожили до выходных! Ты это выдержал и

53🔥1

30 Jan 2026, 13:11 UTC170 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Рабочий год в БонусПлюс мы начали со стратегической сессии на 2026 год 🎯 Да, многие компании проводят такие сессии в конце 2025-го. Мы — нет. Просто не успели. Мы проводили ее впервые, поэтому сразу позвали опытного фасилитатора, чтобы это было не «поговорили и разошлись», а реально наметили планы и раскидали задачи. День первый. Мы определили цель, вполне конкретную и измеримую — рост выручки. Посмотрели на команд

👍5🔥51👌1

21 Jan 2026, 07:06 UTC148 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @bonusplus_officialPhoto

Тренды лояльности в 2026-м году! ✨ На вебинаре Андрей Денисюк, раскроет тренды лояльности в этом году! Вы узнаете: ● Что меняется в поведении клиентов? ● Почему устаревшие подходы больше не работают? ● Как удержать бизнес на плаву в эпоху скорости, удобства и персонализации? 27 января в 11:00 Присоединяйтесь и получите ценные инсайты для роста вашего бизнеса! #БонусПлюс #вебинар

4🤩3🔥2

30 Dec 2025, 09:16 UTC206 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Друзья, с Новым годом!🎄💫 Мы входим в 2026 год в точке больших перемен. Рынок меняется быстрее, чем привычки предпринимателей: растёт фискальная нагрузка, меняется поведение клиентов, а привычные инструменты продаж перестают работать так, как раньше. Сегодня выигрывают те, кто умеет действовать точно, быстро и действительно понимать своего покупателя. Эпоха импульсивных покупок уходит. На первый план выходит умение

7🎄2

17 Dec 2025, 16:19 UTC206 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Друзья, привет. Нахожусь на больничном, поэтому вынужден перенести вэбинар на январь.

💔5

11 Dec 2025, 09:10 UTC244 viewsread 8 August 2026

Подход в работе с клиентом изменился! То, что работало вчера и помогало компаниям повышать доход от клиентов, сегодня дает слабый результат. 18 декабря поделюсь как можно переломить ситуацию. Буду ждать каждого. Ссылка на мероприятие будет ближе к 18 декабря.

23 Nov 2025, 03:56 UTC219 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Почему полезно знать о клиенте больше? Смотрите как знание о важных датах помогает бизнесу. https://rutube.ru/video/a86201f5cc5f74b96e286c18c47857c7/

2🔥2

20 Nov 2025, 06:44 UTC238 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥8🎉2👍21

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @BonusPlusStart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 831,967 of 1,629,372entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Денисюк Андрей” (@BonusPlusStart), 143 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BonusPlusStart.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.