Channel
@Bog6dasha
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
227subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002407883859 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Bog6dasha |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Bog6dasha |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:33 | 227 | +2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 225 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 225 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (1 January 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 831 |
| Reactions total | 51 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 02:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
294 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5285419864360498767 | 140 | 47.6% | |
| custom 5413773866784798756 | 36 | 12.2% | |
| custom 5238016108451089253 | 35 | 11.9% | |
| custom 5282771072129709413 | 28 | 9.52% | |
| custom 5413386679778033513 | 27 | 9.18% | |
| custom 5283231544163447395 | 15 | 5.10% | |
| custom 5283233403884286855 | 13 | 4.42% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 294reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 January 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Bog6dasha. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 January 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Блин... У меня тут в анонимке два вопроса оказывается лежат, и есть несколько озвучек что я чисто для себя делал... Я щас в ресте и мне так в падлу делать такой полноценный и красивый пост, можно я так накалякую ответы и усе? Я не знаю что вы ответите потому будем считать это за да Кароче завтра ждите
Channel name was changed to «[РЕСТ] Дохлая Пара Озвучивает»
✨ ✨✨✨ ✨✨✨✨ 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 Дорогие друзья, как я уже говорил у нас с Линой сейчас отпуск, поэтому мы берем рест, но если вам интересно у меня есть Лайф ТГК где я буду присылать кружочки и иногда фотки с отдыха если вам интересно, так что жду вас там! 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 📰 LifeBlog | ❓Вопросы | 💡 Предложка 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 ♥️ Оригинальный комикс ♥️ 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 ✏️ Автор: moolioli 📱 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 #Озвучка || #AnimalHospital
custom 54137738667847987564custom 52854198643604987672custom 52380161084510892531
Voice message, posted without a caption
custom 54137738667847987565custom 52854198643604987673custom 54133866797780335132
Voice message, posted without a caption
custom 52854198643604987674custom 54137738667847987562
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 52827710721297094138custom 52380161084510892535custom 52832334038842868553
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 52380161084510892539custom 52832334038842868553
✨✨✨✨ ✨✨✨✨✨ 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 Сообщение от Боди: Дорогие зрители, я с прискорбием сообщаю что лично я покидаю фандом Денди Ворлд, для меня это был хороший экспириенс но не более, я хочу чтобы меня знали как озвучкера, а не чисто озвучкера Денди Ворлд, я понимаю что возможно вы начали слушать меня чисто из-за Денди Ворлд, но после выхода информации о Квел я не хочу чтобы на меня нападали, в ближайшее время выйдет еще неско…
custom 52854198643604987678custom 54133866797780335131
✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 Конечно не «сегодня вечером», но вот для вас вкусняшка, спасибо за прекрасный и ржачный монтаж моей любимке 🌟 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 Художник: Lokhи 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 #Прикольчики || #Meme
custom 52854198643604987678custom 52827710721297094135custom 52832334038842868552
Сегодня вечером и завтра наконец накормлю вас дорогие мои
custom 54137738667847987566custom 52380161084510892535custom 52854198643604987672
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 528323154416344739511custom 52827710721297094131custom 52854198643604987671
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 528541986436049876718
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Bog6dasha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,261,271 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Bog6dasha named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“[РЕСТ] Дохлая Пара Озвучивает” (@Bog6dasha), 227 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bog6dasha.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.