Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Bobby Fischer- chess world champion

Channel

Bobby Fischer- chess world champion

@Bobby_Fischer_World_chess

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

235subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001289973860
TypeChannel
Username@Bobby_Fischer_World_chess
Created4 March 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Bobby_Fischer_World_chess

Growth

235236235.56 August 2026 — 236 subscribers7 August 2026 — 236 subscribers14 August 2026 — 235 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 235–236 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 20:37235-1
7 Aug 2026, 02:46236no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:05236first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 July 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 February 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

27 Nov 2020, 05:46 UTC≈4,280 viewsread 7 August 2026

Disclaimer: I don't hate all of those groups; I am just sending the poll to see the results

27 Nov 2020, 04:36 UTC≈4,000 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @NogalsRedpillsPoll

Which do you hate the most?

  1. Jews49%
  2. Furries4%
  3. Niggers8%
  4. Faggots and trannies8%
  5. Chinks1%
  6. Racemixers7%
  7. Thots4%
  8. Cucks/simps7%
  9. Muslims8%
  10. Incels4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Oct 2020, 09:02 UTC≈3,090 viewsread 7 August 2026

Holocaust denial: The radical notion that the people who lied about the rollercosters of death; electric floors and shrunken heads aren't telling the truth about the gas chambers

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Bobby_Fischer_World_chess. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 Nov 2020, 04:36 UTCAnonymous Poll2,960 voters approx.

Which do you hate the most?

  1. Jews49%
  2. Furries4%
  3. Niggers8%
  4. Faggots and trannies8%
  5. Chinks1%
  6. Racemixers7%
  7. Thots4%
  8. Cucks/simps7%
  9. Muslims8%
  10. Incels4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2020 to 13 February 2021. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,426,449 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Nogals Redpills 2
@NogalsRedpills · 5101 postThe Noticer
@theenoticer · 5,2641 postZoomers IRL
@ZoomersIRLOfficial · 9,7991 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

● Procurement ●
@ChannelCollection · 4,4621 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Bobby Fischer- chess world champion” (@Bobby_Fischer_World_chess), 235 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bobby_Fischer_World_chess.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.