Channel
@BoJackNFT
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
30subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001185499633 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BoJackNFT |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BoJackNFT |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:42 | 30 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:46 | 29 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 29 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 March 2024 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
51 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 25 | 49.0% | |
| π | 10 | 19.6% | |
| π₯ | 10 | 19.6% | |
| π | 3 | 5.88% | |
| π | 2 | 3.92% | |
| π€ | 1 | 1.96% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 51reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 March 2024 to 31 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
-ΛΛ π ΛΛ- Happy New Year, #crypto fam! Letβs gallop into 2025 together! β¨ β¨ May your $TON bags be heavy, your memes be spicy, and your gains be legendary. β¨ New Year, New ATH! ππ
π₯6π3
-ΛΛ π ΛΛ- Mass adoption! Gasless transactions are now available on the TON blockchain with the new W5 smart wallet standard. Users can use USDT for transaction fees and NOT coin for gas fees, removing the need for TON coin. Developed by Tonkeeper and approved by the Ton Core Team, the W5 standard simplifies onboarding and reduces barriers to entry. It allows for advanced parallel processing, letting users execute β¦
π9β€2π2π€1
π¨ Beware of Telegram hijacking! Telegram accounts are being hijacked en masse using a new scheme. Fraudsters use a fake Telegram Security account to gain access to your account. The scheme: you receive many requests for a code to log in to messenger. Then, from the fake Telegram Security Messenger account, you are prompted to click on a link to "increase security". The result is predictable - the bad guys immediatβ¦
β€4π1
Channel photo updated
π¨ SCAM alert π¨ Scammers are distributing NFTs that can't be disposed of and they're even deducting money. Here's the gist: you send an NFT to any address, say a burn address, and 1 TON is deducted from you. But this TON goes to the scammer as a commission and the NFT continues to sit in your wallet. Don't send obscure NFTs. Be healthy and safe! π΄ππ Mafia | X | AI Bot Join now π
β€6
It's time to adapt and adopt! AI and Crypto are shaping the future. Don't be left behind. Embrace the change and be a part of the evolution! πππ€ CA: EQBqZroAmvZXu0ZM0PmWKRb5RfHcF-XwOdlum5ehSeDS67W2 Join now π Mafia | X | AI Bot
β€7
BoJack TON Your fun meme token in the world of DeFi. Explore the TON blockchain with us, invest in NFT and enjoy the gameplay with our AI assistant BoJack TON Bot. Join us, together we will create a cryptocurrency world full of hilarious memes and high returns. CA: EQBqZroAmvZXu0ZM0PmWKRb5RfHcF-XwOdlum5ehSeDS67W2 Join now π Chart | Twitter | Channel | Chat | AI Bot | GetGems | YouTube
β€3
Added liquidity yesterday and locked liquidity tokens for 3 years.
π₯3
Channel photo updated
We need to do tweets with hashtags #BoJackTON #Crypto $TON #memecoin At least one a day if it's hard for you. Do we want to make money? We need to get bigger. BoJackOnTonBot will help you come up with tweet text and draw a meme on the topic, just ask it. Talk to him, experiment, 100 requests a day. In other places people pay money for this to get neural network experience. Watch YouTube on how to start talking toβ¦
β€3π₯1
Channel photo updated
Channel photo updated
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BoJackNFT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank β 538,116 of 1,604,161entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βBoJackTON -ΛΛ π ΛΛ-β (@BoJackNFT), 30 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BoJackNFT.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.