Channel
@Bloverseaf
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
69subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002546298155 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Bloverseaf |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Bloverseaf |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:14 | 69 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 69 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (29 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 404 |
| Reactions total | 54 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 10:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
54 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🕊 | 14 | 25.9% | |
| 👌 | 13 | 24.1% | |
| 👏 | 11 | 20.4% | |
| custom 5373276985223051760 | 6 | 11.1% | |
| custom 5373010869049389851 | 5 | 9.26% | |
| 🍓 | 4 | 7.41% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 1.85% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
👐👐🥹🥹🤩🤩➿🌟 🤩 Раз уж у тебя местоимения он/она, то тебя по сути можно считать не только мужчиной, но и женщиной? Или тебе вообще без разницы по поводу этого? ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🔇у, если вам удобнее считать меня женщиной, то я не против! Мне и так и так сойдёт, так что можно сказать, мне без разницы. Хотя.. знаете, об этом мало кто знает, но я могу делать свой голос более женственным! Изменять, проще говоря. 👐✍😀😁😂🤣😃🍰 #po
👌1👏1🕊1
👐👐🥹🥹🤩🤩➿🌟 🤩 🔇kay so um nevermind- мне каким-то боком скинули пикчу с синеволосой девушкой and.. that's all ig? Странно как-то. Я думал, вы отправите нечто большее, чем это. Хотя, если у вас нет идей, что отправить, то я понимаю. Hold on a sec'- мне всё-таки что-то отправили, значит, есть на что ответить. ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Ты всё ещё общаешься с другими растениями? Если да, то как они? Я всё ещё общаюсь с ними, и да, они в …
👌1👏1🕊1
Sticker, posted without a caption
👐👐🥹🥹🤩🤩➿🌟 🤩 🔇gh, I crashed way too late and this freakin' pigeon woke me up. Хотя, не будь его, я б' очнулся намного позднее. Впрочем, мне даж' будильник уже не нужен: этот приятель его заменил. Да и мордочку его приятнее видеть, чем слышать резкий звон под ухом. Не мог не скинуть фото того, как он выглядел со стороны; как минимум, смех у меня он точно вызвал. 🤩 I mean- look at him! И как после такого не захочется ег…
🕊2🍓1👌1👏1custom 53732769852230517601
👐👐🥹🥹🤩🤩➿🌟 🤩 Долго эт' лежало у меня в галерее, но это видео всё-таки заставило меня это скинуть. Буду кидать это отныне каждую неделю.🌟 👐✍😀😁😂🤣😃🍰
👌1👏1🕊1
👐👐🥹🥹🤩🤩➿🌟 🤩 📌Прикреплено видео ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🔇,шиншилла. Забавно выглядит. Я, так понимаю, это своего рода пауза перед тем, как на меня снова кинут кучу бессмысленных видео и пикчей? ... Well, I don't mind it y'all. Go ahead! Но что-то я ушёл не туда. Я не фанат шиншилл, но они довольно милые. Буду ждать следующего поста с этим приятелем на следующей неделе!🌟.. А хотя.. сек'. 👐✍😀😁😂🤣😃🍰 #post
👌1👏1🕊1
👐👐🥹🥹🤩🤩➿🌟 🤩 Какой жанр музыки ты предпочитаешь? 🔇м.. больше ориентируюсь на вайб, чем на конкретный жанр музыки. Ну, срз, ток' взглянуть на мой плейлист в спотифае, так там первым делом встречает альтернативный рок, перемешанный с альтернативным поп-музыкой и денс-панком. Мне нравятся те песни, которые вполне могут меня зарядить. Да и в этих жанрах я как подсолнух среди зомби, так что понятия не имею. I mean, сколько…
👌1👏1🕊1
👐👐🥹🥹🤩🤩➿🌟 🤩 🔇ell.. ig разговор с HQ оказался спокойнее, чем я думал. Хотел поговорить с ним какое-то время назад, но не мог найти удачного момента, а в итоге он сам меня нашёл. Поначалу он, конечно, отвечал мне.. слегка обидчиво, однако со временем всё разъяснили, так что полагаю, терь' мы хотя бы немного, но ладим. Даж' удивлён, что всё прошло именно так. Сколько уже прошло времени с тех пор, как мы не ладили? Месяц…
🐳1👌1🕊1
Sticker, posted without a caption
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 [Клевер хотел ответить на это и уже приоткрыл рот, но тут же затих, отвёл взгляд и не сказал того, о чём думал. Бловер понимал, о чём говорит HQ; всё-таки, подобное чувство он испытывал, пусть и в довольно редких случаях.] «Я-я-я.. понимаю, о чём ты говоришь. Не все будут довольны твоими поступками, но тут скорее зависит также от причин того, что именно ты сделал.» [С этими словами зелёноволосый почесал з…
🕊1custom 53730108690493898511custom 53732769852230517601
Sticker, posted without a caption
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 «Да брось. Всего лишь из-за этого ты готов приписать меня к предателям? Если бы я действительно был таким, то я б' не выжил в зомби-апокалипсисе и сейчас не стоял бы рядом с тобой!» [Пока Бловер говорил, он лишь жестикулировал, причём более неловко и менее уверенно, чем до этого. Да и иногда ему было непросто подобрать слова, настолько он стыдился тех событий.] «Я знаю, что тогда принял неправильное решен…
👌1custom 53730108690493898511custom 53732769852230517601
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Bloverseaf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 863,819 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Blᴏvᴇr's Chᴀnnᴇl!” (@Bloverseaf), 69 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bloverseaf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.