Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

BLONDDE

@Blonbbe

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

22subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003951543333
TypeChannel
Username@Blonbbe
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Blonbbe

Growth

2210 Aug 2026, 13:32 — 22 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 12:34 — 22 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 13:3211 Aug 2026, 12:34
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21–23 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 12:3422no change
10 Aug 2026, 13:3222first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
61.0%
avg views ÷ 22 subscribers
Avg views / post
13.4
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
50.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held12 (2 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total161
Reactions total82
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 12:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
57
Videos
3
Links
8

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
18s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

82 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4959.8%
💋1012.2%
🍓911.0%
❤‍🔥78.54%
👀33.66%
👾22.44%
💘22.44%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 82reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 07:05 UTC4 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @game_csharpball_officialVideo

Тестирую новый объект в игре на будущее обновление (он там будет не один, их там будет два в одной главе!). Видео, если что, прямиком из движка Unity! Каково ваше мнение насчет нового объекта? Оставьте свое мнение в комментариях или в виде реакций. (Звук к этому объекту я еще не подобрал, но хотел поделиться задумкой самого объекта) #спойлер@game_csharpball_official

1💋1

9 Aug 2026, 16:57 UTC5 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @game_csharpball_officialPhoto

Интересный факт: каждый из персонажей, которых вы встретите в видеокассетах и меню "Облики", имеет свое имя, которое им придумывали окружающие. Например: • Имя U01-1323 — Уни (расшифровка U — Universal, универсальный) •Имя S13-1035 — Шейди (расшифровка S — Shadow, тень) •Имя B15-0800 — Блоккер (расшифровка B — Block, защита) •Имя W226-0677 — Варрио (расшифровка W —warrior, воин) •Самое важное здесь то, что каждый и

3

9 Aug 2026, 02:56 UTC14 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026

пока что актива от меня не будет поэтому репосты будут из канала https://t.me/game_csharpball_official

👀32🍓2

7 Aug 2026, 20:42 UTC10 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026

мне уже оч нравится облик нового персонажа жду обнову❤️

4❤‍🔥3

7 Aug 2026, 20:42 UTC11 views11 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @game_csharpball_officialPhoto

Flyida-1... Облик и персонаж нового, следующего обновления #спойлер

4❤‍🔥3🍓2💋2

7 Aug 2026, 20:41 UTC11 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @game_csharpball_officialPhoto

🇮 🇳 🇫 🇴 🇵 🇴 🇸 🇹 Всем привет! Я — AndrCors (Cors1k), создатель мобильной игры C#Ball. Мое хобби — создание игр (или приложений), и пусть это не основное дело в моей жизни, но подхожу к нему я со всей серьёзностью! ✎﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏ Изначально игра C#Ball планировалась как тренажёр для программирования, однако вследствие тестов и просмотра общего вида игры, она была превращена в головоломку, а название C

4👾2

7 Aug 2026, 20:26 UTC12 views10 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

сегодня тока котики есть

🍓5💋3💘2

2 Aug 2026, 21:44 UTC20 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026

вот и колабб с прекрасным художником @Themoonlightofthestars ♥️

4💋3

2 Aug 2026, 21:43 UTC17 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @ThemoonlightofthestarsPhoto

+ ° . ๑・° ⊹ . + ° . ๑・° ⊹ . + ° . Ребята, вот и подошел к концу наш ивент, в честь 100+ подписчиков, с того дня, когда я запустила коллаборации, пришли еще 60+ подписчиков... Спасибо! 💫✨ Надеюсь, вы останетесь со мной на долгие годы моего творчества! 💖 Участники чиби коллаба: @Themoonlightofthestars @furgonchiknyafki @yeysandy @lachnez @Blonbbe @KatajenkaArt @simibumaga Участники простых коллабов: @Themoonlight

5❤‍🔥1💋1

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @Blonbbe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,001,272 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BLONDDE” (@Blonbbe), 22 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Blonbbe.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.