Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for [ИВЕНТ]Blog Good Spectre

Channel

[ИВЕНТ]Blog Good Spectre

@BlogSpectre

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

35subscribers

+16 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004372894318
TypeChannel
Username@BlogSpectre
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 10 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/BlogSpectre

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Previous handles

@BlogSpectre was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.

@spectrebloge
held 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026

Growth

193828.513 August 2026 — 19 subscribers13 August 2026 — 19 subscribers14 September 2026 — 34 subscribers14 September 2026 — 34 subscribers28 September 2026 — 38 subscribers9 October 2026 — 36 subscribers23 October 2026 — 34 subscribers30 October 2026 — 32 subscribers6 November 2026 — 35 subscribers3513 August 20266 November 2026
9 measurements spanning 85 days, net +16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16–41 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 08:3035+3
30 Oct 2026, 00:1432-2
23 Oct 2026, 03:1934-2
9 Oct 2026, 01:2136-2
28 Sept 2026, 20:3838+4
14 Sept 2026, 11:2234no change
14 Sept 2026, 10:4734+15
13 Aug 2026, 08:3319no change
13 Aug 2026, 06:3119first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 10 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 40 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

17 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💘952.9%
💔635.3%
❤15.88%
🤨15.88%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 14 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Sept 2026, 04:24 UTC13 views1 reactionsread 14 September 2026

Как же стало мало союзов за то чистенько

🤨1

14 Sept 2026, 04:21 UTC14 viewsread 14 September 2026

Всем добрейшего утречка мои дорогие друзья) как вам спалось? Как планируете день проводить?

13 Sept 2026, 21:46 UTC18 viewsread 14 September 2026

Жду когда меня будут отменять день 1

13 Sept 2026, 16:40 UTC18 views2 reactionsread 14 September 2026

Завтра в 7:00 по мск таймер выйдет и те кто не успел уж простите союзы будут потеряны, но если в течение 1 дня если вы захотите вернуть союз то надо будет написать мне под постом с союзами

💔2

13 Sept 2026, 10:17 UTC15 viewsread 14 September 2026
Forwarded from @Itr4pp3d_bl0gVideo

▓ — 𝙊𝙝... 𝙃𝙞?.. ──────⊹⊱✫⊰⊹────── 𝑴𝒐𝒆̈ 𝒖мя — 𝑨йз𝒆к 𝑿𝒂йм𝒆𝒑, 𝒙𝒐тя для б𝒐л𝒃ш𝒖н𝒄тв𝒂 я 𝒖зв𝒆ст𝒆н п𝒐д 𝒄в𝒐𝒖м зн𝒂м𝒆н𝒖т𝒃𝑰м н𝒖кн𝒆йм𝒐м «𝐈𝐓𝐫𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐞𝐝» . . . 𝑪𝒆йч𝒂𝒄 мн𝒆 26 л𝒆т, 𝒖 я 𝒏𝒑𝒐ж𝒖в𝒂ю 𝒄в𝒐ю в𝒆с𝒆̈л𝒚ю 𝒙𝒂к𝒆𝒑𝒄к𝒚ю ж𝒖зн𝒃 с𝒐 𝒄в𝒐𝒖м𝒖 люб𝒖м𝒃𝑰м𝒖 др𝒚з𝒃ям𝒖. Н𝒂в𝒆рн𝒐, ʙ𝒃𝑰 х𝒐т𝒖т𝒆 𝒄𝒏𝒑𝒐𝒄𝒖ть, к𝒂к я 𝒏𝒆𝒑𝒆ж𝒖л б𝒂н н𝒂 𝒏л𝒂тф𝒐𝒑м𝒆? 𝑯𝒆 з𝒂б𝒃𝑰ʙ𝒂йт𝒆, чт𝒐 𝒚 𝒙𝒂к𝒆𝒑𝒐ʙ 𝒆𝒄т𝒃 𝒄ʙ𝒐𝒖 ᴋ𝒐з𝒂𝒑𝒖 ʙ 𝒑𝒚к𝒂ʙ𝒆... :) 𝑬ж𝒆л𝒖 ʙ𝒂м 𝒖нт𝒆р𝒆𝒄н𝒂 м𝒐я ж𝒖зн𝒃, т𝒐.

13 Sept 2026, 10:13 UTC45 views1 reactionsread 14 September 2026
Photo

Сапп: Ура победа, кое кто не смог смотреть правде в глаза) весьма забавно что этот чел реально думал что он "открывает людям глаза" но я весьма рад что меня забанили

💘1

13 Sept 2026, 09:38 UTC15 viewsread 14 September 2026
Forwarded from @Danteblog20

Сапп: — Завтра чистка союзов поэтому перешлите это сообщение чтобы остаться там^^

12 Sept 2026, 21:04 UTC29 views1 reactionsread 14 September 2026

Сапп: ждём когда мой блог появится в прослушке "это очень УЖАСТНЫЙ блог бла бла бла" и в комментах все будут "да да да да" будет забавно посмотреть на их аргументы на то что я нытичку защищал, я может быть ещё секрет открою но в хорошем обществе принято защищать друзей и перепроверить информацию С ДВУХ СТОРОН КОНФЛИКТА

💘1

12 Sept 2026, 20:55 UTC42 views1 reactionsread 14 September 2026

Сапп: Согласен полностью и отдельным долбаёбам хочу сказать одно "я открываю глаза людям" А ОНИ БЛЯ ВЕЛИКИЕ СЛЕПЫЕ КОТОРЫЕ НЕ МОГУ САМИ ПРОВИТЬ ИНФОРМАЦИЮ ДА? Открою вам великую тайну МОЖНО ВЫЙТИ ИЗ БЛОГА И НЕ ЕБАТЬ МОЗГИ ЛЮДЯМ

💘1

12 Sept 2026, 18:07 UTC32 viewsread 14 September 2026

Сапп: щас будет отвлетленик от блога честно признаю те кто видели в данный момент удалённый пост, я хочу искренне извиниться я пытался защитить Эллиота потому что он был у меня в союзах но посмотрев правде в глаза я понял что лучше просто разорвать союз второй раз, первый раз был когда сапп Эллиота не подобающе себя вела в чате, а щас вы и сами знаете всю ситуацию, а так же я ещё раз прошу прощения за своё прошлое вы…

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @BlogSpectre. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“[ИВЕНТ]Blog Good Spectre” (@BlogSpectre), 35 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BlogSpectre.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.