Sticker, posted without a caption

Channel
غارِشیطان
@BllackCllover
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
29subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002820131728 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BllackCllover |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 31 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BllackCllover |
Topic
Automotive — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Previous handles
@BllackCllover was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
held 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Oct 2026, 03:45 | 29 | -1 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 11:35 | 30 | -3 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 15:42 | 33 | +3 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 11:55 | 30 | +3 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 03:22 | 27 | no change |
| 14 Sept 2026, 02:47 | 27 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:45 | 30 | -1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 03:54 | 31 | +3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 28 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:14 | 28 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 29 | first reading |
Engagement
31 posts held, back to 10 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 31 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | 2 | 66.7% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 13 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
چون چنلت بهم یه وایب قدیمی و آرشیو طور داد به نظرم یه ماشین نقرهای وایبت باشه Porsche 356 ساخت آلمان - سال 1963 https://t.me/txt24HRs
چون چنلت یه حس آروم، ظریف و یهکم مرموز داره؛ خود اسم Echo هم انگار یه چیزی از گذشتهست که هنوز توی فضا تکرار میشه به نظرم این ماشین مناسبته. Renault 15 ساخت فرانسه - سال 1972 https://t.me/IIECHOII
چون پروفایل چنلت بهم وایب دو تا رفیق قدیمی و خاطراتی که فقط خودشون ازش خبر دارن رو داد، این مینی جمع و جور و صمیمیطور رو انتخاب کردم. Mini Clubman ساخت بریتانیا - سال 1974 https://t.me/giligliii
چون چنلت بهم وایب یه خیابون خلوت، هوای سرد و تنهاییِ آروم داد، این ساب رو انتخاب کردم. Saab 96 ساخت سوئد - سال 1966 https://t.me/alone_e_ee
چون چنلت یه ساختمون قدیمی و سیاهوسفیده، با اسم «عمارت خورشید» یه حس اشرافیِ قدیمی و کمی گوتیک داد بهم. Jaguar E-Type ساخت بریتانیا - سال 1966 https://t.me/TheNinthHeir
چون چنلت یه وایب کلاسیک و نارنجیطوری بهم داد به نظرم این ماشین کاملا مناسبته. Toyota Celica GT ساخت ژاپن - سال 1975 https://t.me/Desiree2024
چون چنلت یه وایب تاریک و ساحلی و شیک بهم داد به نظرم این ماشین کاملا مناسبته. Mercedes-Benz W124 230E ساخت آلمان - سال 1990 https://t.me/HK_Channel88
چون خودت چری فلفلی و متحوای چنلتم ملتو به اتیش میکشونه (از بس ناز و خوشگلی شما) به نظرم اومد این ماشین وایبته. خودت بعد بهم بگو موردعلاقت چیه Chery QQ / Chery Sweet ساخت چین - سال 2006 https://t.me/cherryrainy
چون پروفایل چنلت یه طبیعت مه گرفته خاص بود پس یه ماشینی بهت دادم که هم اهل جاده باشه، هم با طبیعت قاطی بشه. Land Rover Defender 90 ساخت انگلستان - سال 1998 https://t.me/yami_yami_yami_yami
چون چنلت یه وایب شیطون و شلوغی بهم میده پس یه ماشینی انتخاب کردم که مثل خودت پرهیاهوعه. Ford Mustang Mach 1 ساخت آمریکا - سال 1970 https://t.me/JosephGrimaldi
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @BllackCllover. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@JosephGrimaldi · 1032 postsalone
@alone_e_ee · 2151 post.𝐌𝐨𝐨𝐧𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐝.
@arcanes_W0rld · 1201 post𝖠𝖱𝖦𝖫𝟢𝖫𝖴𝖲
@ARGloLUS02 · 921 postدفترچهخاطراتِآبی.
@Bllustory0 · 4891 postتاسـیانِ وارش.ㅤ
@cherryrainy · 271 postHK
@HK_Channel88 · 791 postآخرینستارهخاموششده.
@httpsAngellanddd · 4021 post𝕿𝖙𝖆𝖒𝖊 𝖒𝖊
@idkoidkk · 261 post𝙀𝙘𝙝𝙤
@IIECHOII · 381 postcafehabibi☕️
@javidelnaz_heart · 381 postLayo(v)er
@layoverthv7 · 411 postᴴᵘˢʰ-
@My_Kenopsia · 981 post" اتاقِ کوچیکِ نورا ☕. ノラ
@nouraslittleroom · 411 post𝖲𝗂𝗅𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾|沈黙 "
@oSILENCEo_0 · 961 postRainberry
@rainberryplease · 1201 postسکوت آچار شکسته:)
@sokotA19 · 611 postᎢᏗᎥᎷᏗ
@taima_33 · 1111 post𝙱𝚕𝚘𝚘𝚍𝚢 𝚜𝚞𝚗
@TheNinthHeir · 3181 post24HRs txt
@txt24HRs · 5261 post"خدای زمستان"
@wishiknowhowto · 171 postیـــــــادگـــــــار
@yadegarF · 2941 post闇 | 𝖄𝖆𝖒𝖎
@yami_yami_yami_yami · 4251 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 3
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@BllackCllover named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 15 September 2026 – 15 September 2026 · confirmed gone 14 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 15 September 2026 – 15 September 2026 · confirmed gone 30 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026 · confirmed gone 28 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“غارِشیطان” (@BllackCllover), 29 subscribers as measured 17 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BllackCllover.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.