Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

BLITZ FUN

@Blitz_Fun

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

543subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002274387549
TypeChannel
Username@Blitz_Fun
Description♨️ САМОЕ важное и свежее по Tanks Blitz и World of Tanks Blitz со смехом 🐞 • Сотрудничество: @Tuti_Fruti123
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Blitz_Fun

Growth

54312 Aug 2026, 08:18 — 543 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 08:30 — 543 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 08:1812 Aug 2026, 08:30
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 542–544 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 08:30543no change
12 Aug 2026, 08:18543first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 19 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,650
Videos
53
Links
1,070

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

55 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2240.0%
🔥2138.2%
👍610.9%
👎59.09%
🤣11.82%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 19 August 2025 to 1 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2025, 12:07 UTC298 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @tanks_blitz_officialPhoto

По результатам опроса начнём с плохой новости — лето закончилось 🥲 Хорошая новость — завезли в премшоп набор «День знаний» С праздником! 💐

Signed GIGAHAD

1 Sept 2025, 06:21 UTC298 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @tanks_blitz_officialPhoto

Первые 3 слова (а может и больше 👀), которые увидишь, это то, что ждёт тебя в новом Эпизоде! Присылай свой результат в комменты, а также чекай подробности в видео и новости!

Signed GIGAHAD

29 Aug 2025, 12:35 UTC744 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⚡️ В клиенте новый набор "Небесный огонь" Танчики интересные. Но красные цифры на жёлтой кнопке говорят, что админ нищеброд... 😂 🦷 Зуб даю, купил бы. #lesta

Signed GIGAHAD

27 Aug 2025, 12:35 UTC234 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @BLITZTI

https://t.me/GiveShareBot/app?startapp=M3v9qe1 💥 РОЗЫГРЫШ НА МИСТИЧЕСКИЕ СЕРТЕФИКАТЫ‼️

Signed GIGAHAD

26 Aug 2025, 12:08 UTC232 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💥Завтра выходит обновление 11.12 в WoT Blitz и микропатч 12.3 в Tanks Blitz.✔️ #WoTBlitz | #TanksBlitz |

Signed GIGAHAD

26 Aug 2025, 11:43 UTC157 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @BLITZTIPhoto

⚡️ WZ-1G-P Бесстрашный — всем! 🟢Тестируем новую премиум ПТ-САУ до официального релиза! 🟢По 29 августа 23:59 заходи в Tanks Blitz и получай на аккаунт VIII 🇨🇳 WZ-1G-P Бесстрашный. Играть на нём сможешь до 1 сентября, после чего машина будет списана. 🟢ПТ-САУ будет начислена со 100% экипажем и оборудованием — для максимально комфортных каток. 🟢ТТХ будут зафиналены по итогам эксперимента. ℹ️Продать WZ-1G-P Бесстрашн

👎3

Signed GIGAHAD

23 Aug 2025, 18:06 UTC158 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @BLITZTI

Хотите раздачу промиков?👀

12👎2

Signed GIGAHAD

23 Aug 2025, 13:14 UTC165 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @tanks_blitz_officialVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

Signed GIGAHAD

21 Aug 2025, 13:22 UTC218 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @freebie_blitzPhoto

Некоторым удаётся использовать по 4 кода💥🔥

Signed GIGAHAD

21 Aug 2025, 11:04 UTC128 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Раздача БОНУС-КОДОВ будет в https://t.me/freebie_blitz в 16:00 по МСК💥

2👍1🔥1

Signed GIGAHAD

21 Aug 2025, 11:01 UTC882 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

‼️ Биба, Боба и кусок долба*ба.. Ну а если серьезно, то в премиум магазин на WG завезли такое трио совков❌❌ • Берём?? 🔥 - да 🤣 - нет #WoTBlitz

🤣1

Signed GIGAHAD

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Blitz_Fun. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

20 Aug 2025, 16:38 UTCAnonymous Poll153 voters

ТЕПЕРЬ ОПРЕДЕЛИМСЯ КОГДА

  1. 16:0052%
  2. 17:0011%
  3. 18:0037%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 19 August 2025 to 1 September 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,090,766 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BLITZ FUN” (@Blitz_Fun), 543 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Blitz_Fun.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.