— мой новый тгк кому интересно.

Channel
ПРОДАЖА!! Ушел//Любᴏʙниᴋ Бᴧ϶йᴋ
@BlakeOrbit
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
17subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002853885882 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BlakeOrbit |
| Description | Продажа!! |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BlakeOrbit |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 17 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 17 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 8 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 298
- Videos
- 9
- Links
- 92
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 31s
- Average length
- 16s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
66 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 20 | 30.3% | |
| 💔 | 14 | 21.2% | |
| 🍓 | 13 | 19.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 10.6% | |
| 💋 | 6 | 9.09% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 9.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 66reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 8 October 2025 to 28 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
˚ ✦ . . ˚ . . ✦ ˚ . ★ . . ˚ * ✦ . . ✦ ˚ ˚ ── .✦ чᴛ᧐ ϶ᴛ᧐.? ᥰᥙᥲρ ᥰ᧐ᥴᴛ)) ʙᥴᥱⲙ ᥰρᥙʙᥱᴛ! ⲙᥱня ᤋ᧐ʙуᴛ ᥲ᧘ᥲн, ᥙ ϶ᴛ᧐ ⲙ᧐ᥔ н᧐ʙыᥔ ᴛᴦκ, чᴛ᧐ δы я дᥱ᧘ᥲ᧘ ʙ нᥱⲙ?? ⋆˚꩜。 ── ᥰᥙκчᥙ ── ᥲρᴛы ── ᧐δρы ── ᥙᴦρы, ᥙ ⲙн᧐ᴦ᧐ᥱ дρуᴦ᧐ᥱ) ── .✦ ᥱщё ᥱᥴᴛь ᴛᥲκᥙᥱ ᴛᥱᴦᥙ κᥲκ: #алан #пикча #арт #обра #игры #видио ⋆˚꩜。 #пиарпост https://t.me/Alan_rrr ˚ ✦ . . ˚ . . ✦ ˚ . ★ . . ˚ *…
:: Здравствуйте всем, всей моей бывшей аудитории. На связи ваш старенький блэйк. Хотел вас всех оповестить, что теперь у меня новый канал, и вы можете дальше следить за моим творчеством. Буду ждать каждого моего солнца, кто еще конечно помнит обо мне • Tgk - @HranitelSerafim • По поводу связи - @TaiZheny
💋1
— κᥲκ ʙы, ρᥱδяᴛ.? чᴛ᧐ дᥱ᧘ᥲᥱᴛᥱ.?
— ᥴ ⲙ᧐ᥙⲙ дρуᴦ᧐ⲙ!! ᧐δ᧐жᥲю ᥱᴦ᧐!! ᧘юδ᧘ю.
— ᥙщу нью!
❤🔥2
— ᥴдᥱ᧘ᥲ᧘ ᥲρᴛ дρуᴦу!. ᧐н щᥲᥴ нᥱ ʙ ᥴᥱᴛᥙ..н᧐ нᥲдᥱюᥴь ᥱⲙу ᥰ᧐нρᥲʙᥙᴛᥴя.
🍓3❤🔥2💋1
— ρᥱδяᴛ. ᥊᧐ᴛᥱ᧘ δы ʙᥲⲙ ρᥲᥴᥴκᥲᤋᥲᴛь ᧐дну н᧐ʙ᧐ᥴᴛь, ᥴ ᴛ϶ᥱⲙ ⲙы ρᥲᥴᥴᴛᥲ᧘ᥙᥴь, ᥙ κᥲκ д᧘я ⲙᥱня ϶ᴛ᧐ δы᧘᧐ ᧘учɯᥱᥱ ρᥱɯᥱнᥙᥱ д᧘я нᥲᥴ ᥙᤋ ᤋᥲ нᥱκᥙ᥊ ᥰρ᧐δ᧘ᥱⲙ, н᧐!. ⲙы ᧐ᥴᴛᥲ᧘ᥙᥴь дρуᤋьяⲙᥙ ᥙ нᥱ дᥱρжᥙⲙ нᥲ дρуᴦ дρуᴦᥱ ᤋ᧘ᥲ. κᥲκ ᴛ᧐ ᴛᥲκ..
💔9❤🔥1
— ρᥱδяᴛ. ᥙᤋʙᥙнᥙᴛᥱ чᴛ᧐ ⲙᥲ᧘᧐ ᥰᥙɯу. я δᥱρу ᥰᥱρᥱρыʙ нᥲ нᥱдᥱ᧘ю..ⲙ᧐жᥱᴛ δ᧐᧘ьɯᥱ..ⲙ᧐жᥱᴛ ⲙᥱньɯᥱ..я нᥱ ᤋнᥲю. ⲙнᥱ ᥴᥱᥔчᥲᥴ ᧐чᥱнь ᥰ᧘᧐᥊᧐ ᥙ ⲙнᥱ нᥲд᧐ ᥙᥴᥰρᥲʙ᧘яᴛь ᧐цᥱнκᥙ. ʙρᥱⲙᥱнᥙ нᥱ δудᥱᴛ нᥲ ᥰ᧐ᥴᴛы. нᥱ ᴛᥱρяᥔᴛᥱ! ᥰ᧐ᤋжᥱ ᥰρᥙду. 💔
💔5❤3💯3🍓1
— ⲙᥙ᧘ыᥔ, ᥴᥰᥲᥴᥙδ᧐ чᴛ᧐ ᴛы ᥴ᧐ ⲙн᧐ᥔ.! ϶ᴛ᧐ ⲙ᧐ᥙ ᥴᥲⲙыᥱ д᧐᧘ᴦᥙ ᧐ᴛн᧐ɯᥱнᥙя ʙ ᥙнᴛᥱρнᥱᴛᥱ!! дʙᥲ ⲙᥱᥴяцᥲ, ᴛᥲκ ᥴκ᧐ρ᧐ ᥙ ᴦ᧐д δудᥱᴛ..я ᴛᥱδя ᴛᥲκ ᧘юδ᧘ю κ᧐ᴛᥱн᧐чᥱκ ⲙ᧐ᥔ.! 💍🎁💍
❤4💋4💯3❤🔥1
— κᥲκ ᴛ᧐ ᴛᥲκ ʙыɯᥱ᧘ н᧐ⲙᥱρ!!
❤3🍓1
— у ⲙᥱня ᥱᥴᴛь дʙᥱ ᥰᥙκчᥙ κ᧐ᴛ᧐ρыᥱ я ᥊᧐чу ᥴдᥱ᧘ᥲᴛь..дᥱ᧘ᥲᥱⲙ ᥴнᥲчᥲ᧘ᥲ..
- 1.60%
- 2.70%
The shares total 130%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @BlakeOrbit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
— у ⲙᥱня ᥱᥴᴛь дʙᥱ ᥰᥙκчᥙ κ᧐ᴛ᧐ρыᥱ я ᥊᧐чу ᥴдᥱ᧘ᥲᴛь..дᥱ᧘ᥲᥱⲙ ᥴнᥲчᥲ᧘ᥲ..
- 1.60%
- 2.70%
The shares total 130%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
— ᥴ κᥱⲙ ᥴдᥱ᧘ᥲᴛь ᥰᥙκчу? 🌟
- ᥴ ρ᧐дᥙᴛᥱ᧘яⲙᥙ33%
- ᥴ ⲙужᥱⲙ80%
- ᥴ ρᥲнд᧐ⲙныⲙ чᥱ᧘᧐ⲙ ᥙᤋ ᥊ᥲуᥴᥲ13%
The shares total 126%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 8 October 2025 to 28 November 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@BlakeOrbit named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПРОДАЖА!! Ушел//Любᴏʙниᴋ Бᴧ϶йᴋ” (@BlakeOrbit), 17 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BlakeOrbit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.