Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for قفل

Channel

قفل

@BlackNEWadlerclash

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2subscribers

-13 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003986463344
TypeChannel
Username@BlackNEWadlerclash
Created21 July 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/BlackNEWadlerclash

Growth

11588 August 2026 — 15 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2 subscribers28 August 202630 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 22 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 15:152+1
23 Aug 2026, 17:391-14
11 Aug 2026, 23:0115no change
8 Aug 2026, 13:1515first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

2,638 reactions across 5 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 535493379837711588836513.8%
custom 535531168248471844333812.8%
custom 522217346874476872233512.7%
custom 519747933523308091033212.6%
custom 499473015987031361732312.2%
custom 535521861483838060032212.2%
custom 522212826850894836732012.1%
custom 535497427414891089930311.5%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,638 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Jul 2026, 13:03 UTC676 views528 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Black life again

custom 535493379837711588894custom 535531168248471844380custom 522217346874476872269custom 535521861483838060069custom 519747933523308091061custom 499473015987031361755custom 535497427414891089951custom 522212826850894836749

21 Jul 2026, 13:03 UTC717 views546 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

People are never the same color I don't have any feelings anymore, trusting people's feelings is the answer to your own numbness .

custom 519747933523308091080custom 535493379837711588880custom 522212826850894836773custom 535497427414891089969custom 499473015987031361768custom 535521861483838060060custom 522217346874476872259custom 535531168248471844357

21 Jul 2026, 13:02 UTC662 views526 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Sometimes everything changes with just one thought . People each other they get with words, And they lose with behavior!

custom 535531168248471844377custom 499473015987031361772custom 522217346874476872270custom 535493379837711588865custom 535521861483838060065custom 519747933523308091060custom 535497427414891089959custom 522212826850894836758

21 Jul 2026, 13:02 UTC684 views537 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Changing people will have consequences. Be cool, otherwise life will do something to get you out of the way very easily .

custom 522217346874476872273custom 522212826850894836770custom 499473015987031361769custom 519747933523308091066custom 535493379837711588865custom 535521861483838060065custom 535531168248471844365custom 535497427414891089964

21 Jul 2026, 13:02 UTC611 views501 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Maybe breathing is not life . The strangest days are the days that I didn't think about myself .

custom 522212826850894836770custom 519747933523308091065custom 522217346874476872264custom 535521861483838060063custom 535493379837711588861custom 535497427414891089960custom 499473015987031361759custom 535531168248471844359

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @BlackNEWadlerclash. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“قفل” (@BlackNEWadlerclash), 2 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BlackNEWadlerclash.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.