Broccoli https://x.com/cz_binance/status/1890071433214038103
❤1

Channel
@BlackJackg
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
293subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002147271126 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BlackJackg |
| Description | 🧊Дарова ты на канале черного Джека , здесь будет заработок на BlackJack и женщин 🥃Главный @RJWPPoww Чат - https://t.me/+ogMaTPFvzAg1ZWZi |
| Created | Between 1 March 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BlackJackg |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 293 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:15 | 293 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:56 | 294 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
82 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 33 | 40.2% | |
| 👍 | 26 | 31.7% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 17.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 7.32% | |
| 🙈 | 2 | 2.44% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 1.22% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 82reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 January 2025 to 13 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @BlackJackg. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 January 2025 to 13 February 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Broccoli https://x.com/cz_binance/status/1890071433214038103
❤1
🎩Изи +200$, немного проспал листинг но и ладно
🤡Весь тг уже в Binance WEB3 , а я че хуже ☹️Почему стоит залетать в новый и сейл и шо там вообще интересно? Думаю хватит того факта что в ласт сейле от банана токен дал х5 а тут еще и 800к выделено, так что кушать будем 🔶Что делаем 🔺Нужен акк Binance 🔺Создаём кошелек Web3 🔺вносим депозит до 3 BNB на странице сейла Токены сможем получить уже сегодня в 17:00 по МСК/ 16:00 Кивев и в это же время будет Листинг на декс…
❤4🔥1
🔷Апка от байбита, подвязываете веб3 и фармите поинты. 👨💻Переходим по ссылке и надеемся на дроп https://t.me/bybit_spaces_bot/SpaceS?startapp=invite_2D022IJV_JackFirpov 2D022IJV 🥃BlackJack|💬ЧАТ|BYBIT🔷OKX⚫️MEXC⛰
❤🔥4🙈2
🥸Админ жив в отличии от рынка 💻С утра все видели какой пи№$дец на рынке, я закупил ETH на 1к в холд, если сходим ниже докуплю 🔸Касательно промо только недавно закончился турик по Coinex жду итог список и распределение, а так в тг не вижу особых тем кроме фандинга на xter, который я скипнул. 🔺ИТОГ: 🔻Январь это месяц застоя и лучше накопить банк и начать рыскать инфу которая сильно пригодиться, ну или искать кентов с…
❤2👍1
😮Проснулись улыбнулись, чекаем акки окх за промо $MOVE 😶🌫️Видимо январь устроил лютое затишье по промо, из ворка остаются мини активности от окх, а что Воркаете вы?
Полетело в стакан, сливаем $ANIME 🥃BlackJack|💬ЧАТ|BYBIT🔷OKX⚫️MEXC⛰
👍3
Доброе утро, чекаем окх кто залетал в Jumpstarter , цена листинга ожидается 0.04-0.07
👍4🔥1
😅Заклеймил шляпу +200 на чай спасибо 🫠Сейчас открыли клейм РХ, ооочень все лагает , сидел минут 30 с пк удалось забрать Стейкал +-7к$ #Не_каждый_мог
👍2
🤡Как Hotcoin наебал комьюнити и биржа умерла 😎Тут длинная история, те кто хочет узнать кратко все могут просто прочитать заблюренное сообщение в конце пост , ну а пока начнем со всех грехов платформы начиная от невыплат заканчивая прямым наёбом. 🤡Моё знакомство с биржей началось ещё до шила, и тогда я залетал в промки и звал буквально пару друзей, клоунады было достаточно, платформа висла, криво переводила текст да…
❤10👍5🔥5🤯1
💵Ситуация с Трампом Ебать его в жопу куда каго и как 😎А если серьезно то поскольку токен не соскамился спустя пару часов хайпа и сейчас идёт ожиотаж то можно смотреть на зеленую сторону по этому активу ну или как минимум боковик. 😰Сильного пампа не жду т.к капа идет, но жду еще анонсы от бирж и еще пампа, лудка просто небывалая, если залетаете пожалуйста ставьте плече поменьше т.к актив любит сильно качать, и заходи…
❤4
+11.5$ думаю ещë есть 30-60м до конца
🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BlackJackg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,464,119 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@BlackJackg named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BlackJack” (@BlackJackg), 293 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BlackJackg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.