Posted without readable text
⚡1

Channel
@BizOpenSource
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
602subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002478141477 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BizOpenSource |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BizOpenSource |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:37 | 602 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:46 | 602 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 17 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (17 June 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,560 |
| Reactions total | 43 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
139 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | 76 | 54.7% | |
| 👍 | 25 | 18.0% | |
| 🤣 | 16 | 11.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 13 | 9.35% | |
| 😁 | 8 | 5.76% | |
| 👾 | 1 | 0.719% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 139reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Posted without readable text
⚡1
🔋 Oxirgi 6 kunda - 450$ Tushum. Kiberxavfsizlik sohasida o'rganish etapidaman. Lekin birlamchi ehtiyojlarni qoplash zarur. Bu uchun hozirgi zamonda AI kuchini to'la bilish va AI orkestratorlikning ustunliklarini bilish yetarli. ⚡️ - 50 ta yeg'ilsa, vibecoding bo'yicha shaxsiy kurs taklif qilaman, barcha uchun bepul bo'ladi :)
⚡22
Дунёда нима машмашалар бўляпти ўзи? Мана бу мантиқсизлик трилогияси: 1. «Ромео ва Джульетта» операцияси Терговчиларнинг айтишича, айғоқчилар «Дайвинчик»да гўзал қизлар қиёфасида анкета очиб, йигитларни кинога таклиф қилган (фишинг ҳаволалар орқали пулини шилиб олган). Кейин эса «сен душманга пул ўтказдинг» деб қўрқитиб, диверсия қилишга мажбурлаган. Йигитлар рочмана учрашувга боряпман деб ўйлашган, лекин тўғри «Терр…
⚡1👍1
Агар бир неча йил аввал кимдир «Telegram асосчисини танишув ботидаги анкетлар сабаб халқаро қидирувга беришади» деса, уни жиннихонага равона қилишарди. Бугун эса бу — ФСБнинг расмий пресс-релизи.
😁4
🏴☠️ Piratlar AI'ga ham yetib keldi Stolen Compute degan sayt paydo bo'ldi. U internetdan parolsiz qolgan AI-serverlarni topadi va bitta katalogga yig'adi. Istagan odam kirib, birovning videokartasida bepul model ishlatadi. Hech qanday hack yo'q. . Masshtab: 130 mamlakatda 175 000 dan ortiq ochiq server. Ularning qariyb yarmi tool-calling'ni qo'llaydi — ya'ni model tashqi buyruqlarni chaqira oladi. Demak ochiq qolga…
⚡1
Claude sun'iy intellektini ishlatayotganlar bormi? Postlar chiqmay qolganini sabablari: - Claude Code uchun 112$'ga plan oldim. - Pulini 1 hafta ichida 2 marta oqladi. - O'zimga ataylab qancha shaxsiy hayotim bo'lishiga qarshilik qilsamam, barbir jamiyatda har-xil holat bo'lar ekan, ozgina fizik muammolarga duch keldik, kamchilik bilan yengdik. Uyog'iga shiddat bilan davom ettiramiz. Claude sun'iy intellektini i…
⚡2
Tshunmaganlar uchun ma'lumot berib o'taman: USB, Bluetooth, Wi-fi, Ethernet, Aux, yoki boshqa tarmoq vositalari ishlatilmaydigan joyda yoki holatda, kamera yordamida ma'lumotlarni bir qurilmadan ikkinchisiga kamera (QR code) metodi orqali yoki Ovoz va mikrofon orqali ham o'tkazish mumkin. Videoda aynan QR-code orqali ma'lumotlar exporti aks ettirilgan.
👍1
🔎 Topinglarchi bu nima?)
👍5😁3⚡2
🚨 Sun'iy intellekt kapitulyatsiyasi: Korporatsiyalar o'z perimetrini taslim qildi Palantir CEO'si Alex Karp BigTech AI tokenga milliardlab to'lab, maxfiy datalarini begona gigantlarga topshirayotganini aytdi. Bu xarajat emas — tijorat sirining ochiqchasiga sizib chiqishi (leak). 🛑 1. Vendor-lock: API orqali birovning tarmog'iga qaramlik. Loglar saqlanishi va model vaznlari (weights) ustidan nol nazorat. 🔓 2. Data E…
👍3⚡2👾1
🥷 OSINT Arsenal: 751+ Tool – Ma'lumotlarni parchalash san'ati Tarmoqqa shunchaki OSINT bo'yicha cheat sheet emas, balki deanonimizatsiya uchun to'liq arsenal chiqib ketdi. "Awesome OSINT Arsenal" – 50 ta kategoriyaga bo'lingan, raqamli izlarni qidirish va analiz qilish uchun haqiqiy yadroviy qurol. 🔍 1. Social & Domain Intelligence: Username, email leaks, domenlar va IP-manzillarni chuqur skanerlash vositalari. 💥 2…
👍3⚡2
⭐️Kanalimizda yangi davr: Siyosiy Simulyatsiya va DAO o'yini! Biz kanalni jamoaviy boshqarish uchun butunlay yangi, interaktiv tizimni ishga tushirmoqdamiz. Diqqat: Bu faqat IT va kiberxavfsizlik kanalini boshqarish doirasidagi o'yin (simulyatsiya), haqiqiy siyosatga umuman aloqasi yo'q! Maqsad: Siz o'z partiyangizni tuzib, obunachilar bilan birga kanalimizga qanday postlar chiqishini hal qilasiz. Eng kuchli va nuf…
❤🔥4👍2⚡1
🤖 Bizni kiberxavfsizlik "ekspert" ukalarimiz Windows kernelini yillab titkilayotgan paytda, AI xakerlikni konveyerga qo'yvotti. Anthropic o'zining Claude Mythos Preview modelini N-day zaifliklarga qarshi test qilibdi. 🪟 Oldin uyamni (vulnerability) topib exploit yozish uchun oylab vaqt ketardi. Claude esa 6 soatda 21 ta Windows zaifligidan 18 tasiga tayyor PoC yozgan. Birinchisi atigi 31 daqiqada tayyor bo'lgan. Sen…
⚡5👍3❤🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @BizOpenSource. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 995,231 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Biz-opensource” (@BizOpenSource), 602 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BizOpenSource.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.