Photo, posted without a caption

Channel
Bitcoin
@Bitcoin_db
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
262subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002564943209 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Bitcoin_db |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 30 May 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Bitcoin_db |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:33 | 262 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 264 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:35 | 265 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:01 | 266 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 266 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 30 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 4m 04s
- Average length
- 4m 04s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 4 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2025 to 13 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
✅ The third prediction has also come true. 🔗 [Link to the second prediction] 🔗 [Link to the first prediction] 📊 Further analysis will be shared in the VIP channel. https://t.me/Bitcoin_db
Some people still don’t know where they are, who I am, or what exactly I do. I’m just a simple #Analyst. So far, I’ve shared three signals and accurately predicted Bitcoin’s #Future movements. One important thing to note: none of my posts are edited after they’re published. That means you can always check the timestamp and Bitcoin’s price at that moment to verify them yourself. My most recent prediction was last ni…
105000 BTC
What’s next for Bitcoin’s price? Experts are split into three groups: Some think it’s going up, others say it’ll trade sideways, and a few believe it’s heading down. So, who’s actually right?
In the past 24 hours , 219,803 traders were liquidated , the total liquidations comes in at $980.41 million The largest single liquidation order happened on Bitmex - XBTUSD value $10.00M Are you okay!?
James, I told you to fasten your seatbelt! If you had just invested \$10,000 in USDC, I would've shown you how to position yourself so you wouldn’t have missed out on another \$2.8 million. I don’t know if you caught the third multi-million-dollar free signal I dropped in the public channel this morning (GMT time)... But just know this — the storm isn’t over yet. So don’t unbuckle just yet!
#Futures is like Flying in a #Wingsuit you either soar to glory, or fall into oblivion. You still in? T.me/Bitcoin_db
Are you ready to ride with #Bitcoin? Then buckle up! If you want more accurate signals, just send us a message. @Bitcoin_db
5 Famous Figures in the Crypto World Who Vanished or Died 1. Jeffrey Huang (Machi Big Brother): From Faking His Death to Meme Coin Fame 2. Ho Lzhi: The Coder Consumed by Paranoia 3. The Mysterious Death of Nikolai Mushegian 4. Gerald Cotten and the \$190 Million Mystery 5. The Crypto Queen and the Rumors of Her Death
From One Thief to Another Many people who’ve gotten into crypto have done so because of the economic problems in their home countries. They brought the money they couldn’t invest locally into the global crypto market—a space without borders. What they don’t realize, though, is that the same forces that blocked investment opportunities back home exist here too—just wearing a different mask. Another issue is the chao…
The big bear coming down the mountain is actually the same little bull that climbed up earlier and sold its Bitcoin at that price. Now, it wants to go back down the mountain, turn back into a bull, and buy Bitcoin at the lowest price.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Bitcoin_db. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 100,821 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bitcoin” (@Bitcoin_db), 262 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bitcoin_db.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.