Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

BitRealm

@Bit_Realm

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

73subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002498896171
TypeChannel
Username@Bit_Realm
DescriptionProbably Nothing Owner: @EternalDespairInTheSilence
CreatedBetween 1 October 2024 and 3 February 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Bit_Realm

Growth

737 August 2026 — 73 subscribers9 August 2026 — 73 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 72–74 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 22:1673no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:1873first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 3 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
338
Videos
36
Links
150

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 44s
Average length
35s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

50 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1530.0%
1122.0%
🤬714.0%
👏510.0%
👍48.00%
👎48.00%
custom 544749936733220582236.00%
🥰12.00%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 February 2025 to 11 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Feb 2025, 13:26 UTC340 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Дали шума 😂 Our surprise is called Stupidity Tax For anyone who bought Penguin Sticker I added a Stupidity Tax. You will be charged 3 times more to return your gift to your account(0.3 TON instead of 0.1 TON) 🖕 And if you didn't buy a copyable overpriced cash grab Penguin Sticker, I made a 20% discount for returning your gift to your account(0.08 TON instead of 0.1 TON) 😁 The audacity of wasting TON & Telegram Ec

👍2🤬21🥰1😁1

10 Feb 2025, 10:49 UTC238 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Notcoiner tried to find the very person who threatened to kill him with an axe; he was even willing to pay for any information. A person under the pseudonym Ace Airdrop came forward, claiming to know who had threatened Sasha. In the end, they sent Sasha a random person, and now all the Indians are joking about how Sasha Notcoiner got scammed.

😁5🤬21

10 Feb 2025, 10:26 UTC185 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

The deadline for completing the captcha in memhash is until 15.02

3👎1🤬1

10 Feb 2025, 00:50 UTC155 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🌐 About the Burning Issue After riding in the black cybertruck AVA✋ and sleeping in "Tetris," Alexander had a realization: tappers are an unreliable audience. On one hand, I understand him. Right now, he's trying to wiggle out of a situation (which has been blown out of proportion), and for a month now, he's been clumsily justifying himself while also getting slightly aggressive in his responses. But a "quick" way

👏51👎1🤬1

8 Feb 2025, 02:57 UTC128 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

1👎1🤬1

7 Feb 2025, 12:29 UTC126 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @point_communityVideo

Watch until the end #POINT_REVOLUTION ⭐️

👎1

7 Feb 2025, 09:55 UTC127 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Pantera Capital invested in Humanity Protocol with a capitalization of $1,100,000,000 (FDV) Now Testnet is running, just go in and click the claim daily reward button

1

6 Feb 2025, 14:01 UTC121 viewsread 9 August 2026

I advise you to start following @point_community there will be something interesting.

6 Feb 2025, 13:53 UTC123 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Cryptocurrencies other than BTC that would most reasonably be included in the US government reserve if one were created

6 Feb 2025, 13:49 UTC135 viewsread 9 August 2026

Probably, @Step_mania_bot will become a tool for TF’s next attempt to enter the American market. According to current rumors, the project will be pushed at the Notcoin level. There is no need to skip, you are still early bird.

5 Feb 2025, 15:22 UTC135 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Notcoiner blamed all the influencers and leaders, declaring that they only want to make money and do not protect their audience. He also said that influencers are to blame for moving the audience from one project to another. Meanwhile, Sasha: — I have launched more than 10 projects that are on the verge of death — More than one project of Sasha has not given positive emotions and increased balance — $20,000,000

👍2

5 Feb 2025, 12:49 UTC84 viewsread 9 August 2026

I'll create a leaderboard soon, let's see who will walk the most)

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Bit_Realm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BitRealm” (@Bit_Realm), 73 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bit_Realm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.