Channel
@BitXWisdom
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
47subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003054890168 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BitXWisdom |
| Description | Brains are more complex. Questions are deeper. Answers are weirder. And your mind? It's about to be blown(◠‿◕).. ------------------------------------------ (نا)گفتنیهایِ (نا)گاهِ (نا)موجود.. |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BitXWisdom |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:19 | 47 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:06 | 47 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 46 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (7 August 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 170 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 13:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
▫️توئیکینگ: خطرناکترین نوعِ تقلب علمی دانشگاه MIT به تازگی کتابی را منتشر کرده که نگاه جدیدی دارد به مقوله تقلب در پژوهش و بحران اعتبار علم. این کتاب را Thomas Plümper و Eric Neumayer نوشتهاند: The Credibility Crisis in Science: Tweakers, Fraudsters, and the Manipulation of Empirical Results دو نوع تقلب در پژوهش وجود دارد که خیلی آشکار و واضح هستند و در غیراخلاقی بودن آنها شکی نیست. یکی دادهسازی (Data Fabricati…
از دانشکده فنی تا کَلتِک از کلتک تا jpl از jpl تا صنعت از صنعت تا دانشگاه پنسیلوانیا و از دانشگاه پنسیلوانیا تا جلد مجله نیچر این مسیر پرفراز و نشیب، داستان پسرِ کنجکاوی است که روزی با دیدن یک رادیوی ترانزیستوریِ بدون سیم، مسحور امواج نامرئی شد؛ کسی که امروز یکی از بزرگترین غولهای علمی جهان در فیزیک، فوتونیک و مهندسی برق است: پروفسور نادر انقطاع در این مصاحبه، قرار نیست فقط با یک رزومه آکادمیک خشک روبرو شوید بلک…
باسمه تعالی پرسش و پاسخ ریاضی(۱۳) پرسش: منظور از هندسهٔ جبری چیست؟ پاسخ: هندسهٔ جبری شاخهای از ریاضیات است که به مطالعهٔ مجموعههای هندسیِ تعریفشده بهوسیلهٔ معادلات چندجملهای میپردازد. این شاخه، پیوندی عمیق میان جبر و هندسه برقرار میکند؛ بهگونهای که ویژگیهای هندسی یک شکل را از طریق معادلات جبری آن بررسی میکنیم و، برعکس، از ویژگیهای هندسی برای فهم ساختارهای جبری بهره میگیریم. 🌹 در هندسهٔ جبری، تنها ش…
محتوی جلسات: جلسه اول - معرفی درس . ارزیابی . اصول اقلیدس و ... آغاز منطق https://youtu.be/MSWM4VE5gG0 جلسه دوم - نفی گزاره . عطف . فصل . شرط . دو شرطی . هم ارزی . استلزام . قضیه https://youtu.be/IpyL_9bGJXQ جلسه سوم - استنتاج . اثبات . سور . نقیض سور https://youtu.be/otimiQEfcEo جلسه چهارم - تعویض سورها . استدلال قیاسی . برهان https://youtu.be/t8TJ2vMaCeQ جلسه پنجم - استقراء ریاضی . چند مثال https://youtu.be/7L…
#متفرق
https://youtu.be/hXr8FFm6TDA?si=9W5xEgl8pAIWjx76
نظرات استاد در مورد چالشهای استارت آپ و کلا entrepreneurship، ساخت/بکارگیری در عملِ ai و.. https://youtu.be/CxXgV54KzpQ?si=bpDqn2oTZakx2zhA
https://youtu.be/7JXgClQoGj0?si=q4h1gyec9OYhyBCY
https://youtu.be/jhdSKbmbRZA?si=FCGa-ZNCRFmwWAAq
جف دین نرمافزارها را مستقیما با زبان باینری مینویسد، بعد سورسکد را صرفا به عنوان یک داکیومنت برای بقیه دولوپرها مینویسد تا بفهمند چه کار کرده. جف دین چون از زمان اجرای ثابتِ O(1) راضی نبود، اولین الگوریتم O(1/n) دنیا را خلق کرد. سرعت کد زدن جف دین اواخر سال ۲۰۰۰ دقیقا ۴۰ برابر شد؛ صرفا چون کیبوردش را به USB 2.0 ارتقا داد. جف دین نمیخوابد، فقط پردازشهایش را میفرستد بکگراند. وقتی جف دین یک profiler را اجرا …
احتمالا تا الان این تیتر خبر را در جاهای مختلف دیدید: جِف دین (Jeff Dean) پس از ۲۷ سال گوگل را ترک کرد. نیازی به بازگویی اخبار و هیجانات رسانهای نیست، برای کسانی که با لایههای زیرین مهندسی نرمافزار و معماری سیستمهای embedded سروکار دارند، این خبر چیزی شبیه به پایان یک دوران زمینشناسی در سیلیکِنولیست؛ خروج یک مهندس از شرکتی که از ۲۵ نفر به ۱۹۰٬۰۰۰ کارمند رسیده، معمولا اهمیت سیستماتیک ندارد، اما وقتی مارکت تنها …
Jeff Dean
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @BitXWisdom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 248,783 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bit x Wisdom” (@BitXWisdom), 47 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BitXWisdom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.