Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

BIOLOGIYA TIMES || QUIZ TEST MILLIY SERTIFIKAT SAVOLLARI AUDIO TAHLILI KANALI ATTESTATSIYA UCHUN TAYYORLOV KURSI ONLINE VIDEO 10

@Biologiya_times

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

428subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001355224127
TypeChannel
Username@Biologiya_times
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Biologiya_times

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 3 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@Biologiya_times/3504 · this entry9 Feb 2022, 15:41 UTC@Biologiya_test_savollar/6209 Feb 2022, 15:41 UTC1.00under a minute
@Biologiya_times/3506 · this entry9 Feb 2022, 20:34 UTC@Biologiya_test_savollar/6219 Feb 2022, 20:34 UTC1.00under a minute
@Biologiya_times/3509 · this entry9 Feb 2022, 22:32 UTC@Biologiya_test_savollar/6249 Feb 2022, 22:32 UTC1.00under a minute
@Biologiya_times/3512 · this entry9 Feb 2022, 22:32 UTC@Biologiya_test_savollar/6279 Feb 2022, 22:32 UTC1.00under a minute
@Biologiya_times/3513 · this entry9 Feb 2022, 22:32 UTC@Biologiya_test_savollar/6289 Feb 2022, 22:32 UTC1.00under a minute
@Biologiya_times/3514 · this entry9 Feb 2022, 22:32 UTC@Biologiya_test_savollar/6299 Feb 2022, 22:32 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@Biologiya_test_savollar12 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minuteeven
@biologiya_olimpiada12 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (120)
@biologiya_quiz12 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (120)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 6 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 14 comparable posts for this entry, running 9 February 2022 to 24 February 2022. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 4, the earliest publisher we hold is @Biologiya_test_savollar. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

428429428.57 Aug 2026, 05:51 — 429 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 06:01 — 429 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 07:46 — 428 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 05:517 Aug 2026, 07:46
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 428–429 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 07:46428-1
7 Aug 2026, 06:01429no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:51429first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 February 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 February 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

457 reactions across 15 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍22449.0%
😁9721.2%
408.75%
🤔183.94%
🔥173.72%
🥰132.84%
🎉112.41%
👏91.97%
😱81.75%
🤯81.75%
😢61.31%
🤩61.31%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 457reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 February 2022 to 24 February 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Feb 2022, 17:21 UTC≈12,500 views83 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Амазонка сут қурбақаси 🐸 Бу гўзал жонзот кичик ўлчамларга эга (6,4 дан 10,2 см гача). Унинг кўзлари катта, қўллар ва оёқлар сўрғичлар билан қопланган. Шунинг учун у силлиқ барглар устида бемалол юради. Унинг номланиши бевосита ўзидаги хусусият билан боғлиқ. У қўрқиб кетганда ўзидан ранги сутга жуда ўхшаш суюқлик ишлаб чиқаради. @biologiya_times

👍44🔥12😁8😱8🥰63🤩2

Signed

23 Feb 2022, 15:12 UTC≈10,800 views46 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Eshakka xos bo'lmagan qatorni aniqlang? ✍: @Ziyaboyev_Elmurod

  1. Quloq suprasini harakatlantira oladi16%
  2. Ko‘richak o‘simtasi uzun21%
  3. Oshqozoni kameralarga bo‘linmagan30%
  4. Oshqozonida infuzoriyalar yashaydi33%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍256😁5🔥4🤔4🎉2

Signed Ziyaboyev Elmurod

23 Feb 2022, 13:56 UTC≈10,500 views45 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Echkiga xos xusiyatni aniqlang

  1. O’ng aorta ravogiga ega17%
  2. Oshqozoni 4 bo’lmali50%
  3. Ko’richagi juda uzun19%
  4. Quloq suprasi mavjud emas14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍32🎉9👏2😁2

Signed

22 Feb 2022, 13:43 UTC≈9,560 views101 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Bilasizmi! Koalalar vaqtining 98 foizini ovqatlanish va uxlash, qolgan vaqtlarini esa juft izlashga sarflar ekanlar. Agar ularni topa olmasalar, yana uxlashar ekan.😂 @biologiya_times

😁77👍7🥰6🤯5🤩42

Signed

13 Feb 2022, 15:01 UTC≈9,930 views85 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Qulupnay mevasining hosil bo'lish jarayoni @biologiya_times

👍4627👏7😁5

Signed

9 Feb 2022, 22:32 UTC≈5,980 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🎲 “⚡️Attestatsiyaga tayyorgarlik onlayn kursi uchun mahsus 7⃣-quiz 📊” ✍Tuzuvchi: @Ziyaboyev_Elmurod testi 🖊 20 ta savol · ⏱ 30 soniya

👍3

Signed Ziyaboyev Elmurod

9 Feb 2022, 22:32 UTC≈6,300 viewsread 7 August 2026

🎲 “⚡️Attestatsiyaga tayyorgarlik onlayn kursi uchun mahsus 8⃣-quiz 📊” ✍Tuzuvchi: @Ziyaboyev_Elmurod testi 🖊 20 ta savol · ⏱ 30 soniya

Signed Ziyaboyev Elmurod

9 Feb 2022, 22:32 UTC≈6,560 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🎲 “⚡️Attestatsiyaga tayyorgarlik onlayn kursi uchun mahsus 9⃣-quiz 📊” ✍Tuzuvchi: @Ziyaboyev_Elmurod testi 🖊 20 ta savol · ⏱ 30 soniya

👍3

Signed Ziyaboyev Elmurod

9 Feb 2022, 22:32 UTC≈7,020 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🎲 “⚡️Attestatsiyaga tayyorgarlik onlayn kursi uchun mahsus 1⃣0⃣-quiz 📊” ✍Tuzuvchi: @Ziyaboyev_Elmurod testi 🖊 20 ta savol · ⏱ 30 soniya

2

Signed Ziyaboyev Elmurod

9 Feb 2022, 22:32 UTC≈7,520 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🎲 “⚡️Attestatsiyaga tayyorgarlik onlayn kursi uchun mahsus 1⃣1⃣-quiz 📊” ✍Tuzuvchi: @Ziyaboyev_Elmurod testi 🖊 20 ta savol · ⏱ 30 soniya

👍3

Signed Ziyaboyev Elmurod

9 Feb 2022, 22:32 UTC≈8,150 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🎲 “⚡️Attestatsiyaga tayyorgarlik onlayn kursi uchun mahsus 1⃣2⃣-quiz 📊” ✍Tuzuvchi: @Ziyaboyev_Elmurod testi 🖊 20 ta savol · ⏱ 30 soniya

👍2

Signed Ziyaboyev Elmurod

9 Feb 2022, 22:32 UTC≈8,580 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🎲 “⚡️Attestatsiyaga tayyorgarlik onlayn kursi uchun mahsus 1⃣3⃣-quiz 📊” ✍Tuzuvchi: @Ziyaboyev_Elmurod testi 🖊 20 ta savol · ⏱ 30 soniya

👍6

Signed Ziyaboyev Elmurod

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Biologiya_times. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Feb 2022, 15:12 UTCAnonymous Quiz3,200 voters approx.

Eshakka xos bo'lmagan qatorni aniqlang? ✍: @Ziyaboyev_Elmurod

  1. Quloq suprasini harakatlantira oladi16%
  2. Ko‘richak o‘simtasi uzun21%
  3. Oshqozoni kameralarga bo‘linmagan30%
  4. Oshqozonida infuzoriyalar yashaydi33%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

23 Feb 2022, 13:56 UTCAnonymous Quiz3,180 voters approx.

Echkiga xos xusiyatni aniqlang

  1. O’ng aorta ravogiga ega17%
  2. Oshqozoni 4 bo’lmali50%
  3. Ko’richagi juda uzun19%
  4. Quloq suprasi mavjud emas14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Feb 2022, 15:46 UTCAnonymous Quiz1,790 voters approx.

Parazit hayvonlarni tarqatuvchi parazit hayvonlarni ko'rsating.

  1. bo'ka va so'na25%
  2. kalamush va chivin35%
  3. iskaptopar va chivin23%
  4. iskaptopar va kalamush17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 February 2022 to 24 February 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BIOLOGIYA TIMES || QUIZ TEST MILLIY SERTIFIKAT SAVOLLARI AUDIO TAHLILI KANALI ATTESTATSIYA UCHUN TAYYORLOV KURSI ONLINE VIDEO 10” (@Biologiya_times), 428 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Biologiya_times.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.