Channel
@Binary_Options_Rating
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Cite this entry
20,012subscribers
+6,829 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001677447424 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Binary_Options_Rating |
| Description | ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ |
| Created | 11 June 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Binary_Options_Rating |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
4.6 average views per post against 20,012 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.023%. Across the 6,344 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,002–31,609 subscribers, posting mainly in English — the middle half sit between 2.73% and 15.7%, with a median of 7.33%.
| Window | 30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 31 of 31 published in the window (31 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 144 |
| Mature posts only | 0.024% over 29 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 20,012 measured 12 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b10000:eng · 6,344 channels · p10 0.726% · p25 2.73% · p50 7.33% · p75 15.7% · p90 28.3% |
| Position in cohort | 0.583th percentile · 1/333 the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.144% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | English · 100.0%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:14 | 20,012 | +9,763 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:35 | 10,249 | +22 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 10,227 | -2,956 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 13,183 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:37 | 13,183 | first reading |
32 posts held, back to 11 June 2022 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 32 (11 June 2022 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 144 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 02:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Oil AND gold are rising before today’s CPI. Brent: 6th straight session higher Gold: +0.8% Geopolitical risk: climbing Markets are hedging inflation and fear at the same time. CPI could light the fuse. 👤👤👤👤👤👤👤👤👤👤 Top binary options brokers 🥶 👥👥👥👥👥👥👥👥👥👥
The Fed just sent markets a warning. “Inflation is the biggest problem.” September is now almost a coin flip between a rate hike and a hold. Tomorrow’s CPI could decide the next major move. Stocks, USD, gold — buckle up. 👤👤👤👤👤👤👤👤👤👤 Top binary options brokers 🥶 👥👥👥👥👥👥👥👥👥👥
A Bitcoin miner just became an AI infrastructure stock overnight. Riot Platforms: +17% premarket. Anthropic deal: ~$9B over 20 years. Crypto miners are turning power into AI compute. Smartest pivot of 2026 — or peak AI FOMO? 👤👤👤👤👤👤👤👤👤👤 Top binary options brokers 🥶 👥👥👥👥👥👥👥👥👥👥
Nvidia just put $500 BILLION behind the AI boom. BlackRock. Goldman. KKR. Blackstone. Apollo. All joining Nvidia to finance massive AI infrastructure. Jensen can backstop up to $125B. AI bubble — or the biggest capex supercycle ever? 👤👤👤👤👤👤👤👤👤👤 Top binary options brokers 🥶 👥👥👥👥👥👥👥👥👥👥
Intel just dropped a $15 BILLION surprise. The company is selling new shares to fund its AI chip manufacturing push. INTC: -4% today Stock: nearly 3X in 2026 AI comeback — or a massive dilution trap? 👤👤👤👤👤👤👤👤👤👤 Top binary options brokers 🥶 👥👥👥👥👥👥👥👥👥👥
Wall Street just entered FOMO mode. S&P 500: +5.8% in 4 sessions. Bullish Percent Index: above 70%. Traders are piling into short-dated calls. Stocks AND volatility are rising together. Healthy breakout — or the FOMO top? 👤👤👤👤👤👤👤👤👤👤 Top binary options brokers 🥶 👥👥👥👥👥👥👥👥👥👥
Wall Street just got another bullish call. JPMorgan raised its S&P 500 target to 8,000. 85% of reporting companies are beating expectations, with AI still driving earnings. But from here, that’s only ~3% upside. Bull market — or almost fully priced in? 👤👤👤👤👤👤👤👤👤👤 Top binary options brokers 🥶 👥👥👥👥👥👥👥👥👥👥
China just sent a warning into Monday’s open. CPI: 0.5% — 6-month low PPI: 3.5% vs 3.8% expected Monthly CPI: -0.1% vs +0.2% expected Factories are still contracting. Global growth scare — or stimulus fuel? 👤👤👤👤👤👤👤👤👤👤 Top binary options brokers 🥶 👥👥👥👥👥👥👥👥👥👥
Crypto just moved one step closer to a U.S. rulebook. The Senate is pushing the CLARITY Act toward a floor vote. It could finally define when tokens are securities vs commodities. Bitcoin: ~$64.8K. Bullish clarity — or regulation crypto won’t like? 👤👤👤👤👤👤👤👤👤👤 Top binary options brokers 🥶 👥👥👥👥👥👥👥👥👥👥
Wall Street just hit a record after the U.S. LOST jobs. Now CPI is the trap. Forecast: 3.4% inflation. A hot print could revive Fed hike fears and hit tech hard. The market celebrated weakness Friday. Will inflation ruin the party? 👤👤👤👤👤👤👤👤👤👤 Top binary options brokers 🥶 👥👥👥👥👥👥👥👥👥👥
Hormuz reopening just hit a wall. U.S.: a deal could come soon. Iran’s Revolutionary Guard: reopening happens only if Washington accepts Iran’s conditions. ~20% of global oil used to pass through the strait. Monday could get wild. Deal — or trap? 👤👤👤👤👤👤👤👤👤👤 Top binary options brokers 🥶 👥👥👥👥👥👥👥👥👥👥
The U.S. just LOST 23,000 jobs. Forecast: +80K. And the S&P 500 still closed at a RECORD HIGH. Bad economic news became good market news as Fed hike odds dropped below 50%. Healthy rally — or markets celebrating weakness? 👤👤👤👤👤👤👤👤👤👤 Top binary options brokers 🥶 👥👥👥👥👥👥👥👥👥👥
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @Binary_Options_Rating. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“OLYMP TRADE | QUOTEX | POCKET OPTION | BINARIUM” (@Binary_Options_Rating), 20,012 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Binary_Options_Rating.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.