Channel
@BinanceOTCTrading
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
475subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001671514916 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BinanceOTCTrading |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BinanceOTCTrading |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Aug 2026, 19:18 | 475 | +6 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:48 | 469 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 471 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:46 | 471 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (30 March 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 425 |
| Reactions total | 13 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 19:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
58 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 27 | 46.6% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 22.4% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 8.62% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 6.90% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 6.90% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 3.45% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 1.72% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.72% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 1.72% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 58reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 March 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
[Binance OTC Weekly] Bitcoin is back near $65K, and the macro backdrop is finally starting to look less hostile. Lower yields, softer oil, record-high equities, and improving ETF inflows are helping — but the real risk may now be USD/JPY and a potential carry-trade unwind. In this week’s note, our desk breaks down why liquidity is improving, why BTC is holding up, and what could still go wrong. To see more details…
👍1
[Binance OTC Weekly] Crypto’s reaction to the FOMC rate hold was muted, as the decision was already priced in. BTC volatility remains compressed, while ETF flows, Fear & Greed, and spot volume all point to the same theme: panic selling has faded, but strong demand has not returned yet. Overall, the market is stabilizing, sellers look exhausted, and crypto is waiting for the next macro catalyst. To see more details…
👍2🔥2👏1
[Binance OTC Monthly] Welcome to the sixth edition of the Binance OTC & Execution Services Monthly Digest. In this issue, we review a June defined by tighter liquidity and a firmly hawkish Federal Reserve, as reaccelerating inflation, elevated yields, and a stronger dollar kept macro conditions restrictive. We also examine what deepening ETF outflows, defensive positioning, and a broad altcoin drawdown signal about…
👍2🔥1🥰1
[Binance OTC Weekly] Crypto markets showed further signs of stabilization this week, with Bitcoin leading the rebound, sentiment improving, and ETF inflows turning positive again. Still, the recovery remains cautious rather than fully bullish, as broader market participation has yet to catch up. In our latest commentary, we break down what improved — and what still needs confirmation. To see more details of our ana…
⚡1👍1🔥1
[Binance OTC Weekly] This week gave crypto something it has been missing for a while: a fresh narrative with real market impact. Robinhood’s push into tokenized equities and on-chain finance lifted ARB and improved DeFi sentiment, while Bitcoin quietly showed better resilience even as U.S.-Iran tensions pushed oil higher and pressured broader risk assets. In our latest desk note, we break down why the setup is getti…
👍2🔥1
[Binance OTC Weekly] Bitcoin is starting to show early signs of stabilization, but the macro backdrop is still far from supportive. ETF flows have improved and the $57,000–58,000 zone is holding, yet hawkish Fed guidance, oil-driven inflation risk, and broader cross-asset weakness continue to cap conviction. In this week’s note, our desk breaks down why the setup is becoming more constructive — but still not fully c…
🔥2❤1👍1
[Binance OTC on Binance Square Live VIP Voices replay] Missed last week's Binance Square Live session? Watch the replay of our Binance VIP Voices episode from last week where Adam Bull, Binance OTC & Execution Services Lead, went over the full BES suite, how it can benefit your operations, and the latest upgrades built for faster, smarter OTC trading. Binance Execution Services (BES) brings Spot RFQ and Execution i…
👍3
[Binance OTC Weekly] Crypto got some relief from easing geopolitical risk, but the rally did not stick. That tells us the real issue is still liquidity, not headlines. With the Fed staying higher for longer and Bitcoin struggling below resistance, the market remains defensive. In this week’s commentary, we explain why BTC needs a stronger catalyst before the next meaningful move higher. To see more details of our a…
👍1😱1
[Binance OTC on Binance Square Live VIP Voices tomorrow] Binance Execution Services (BES) brings Spot RFQ and Execution into one professional dashboard, with a dedicated OTC trader on every order and full visibility from quote to execution. On 19 June at 8:30AM UTC, we walk you through everything. Join Adam Bull, Binance OTC & Execution Services Lead, for Binance VIP Voices as we cover the full BES suite, how it c…
❤1👍1
[Binance OTC Weekly] Higher oil, persistent inflation, and cautious central bank expectations continue to weigh on risk appetite and broad market momentum. In this week’s report, our desk outlines why BTC may consolidate from here and why selectivity remains more important than broad beta exposure. To see more details of our analysis, please check the post on Binance Square: https://www.binance.com/en/square/post/3…
👍2🥰1
[Binance Execution Services Launch Campaign] Binance OTC has consolidated Spot RFQ and Execution into Binance Execution Services (BES), a single, unified trading dashboard. Clients can raise quote requests, review live pricing, and execute orders entirely within the BES dashboard, without relying on external communication channels. Every order connects clients to a dedicated Binance OTC trader via a persistent in-p…
🔥2🎉1
[Binance OTC Weekly] The macro backdrop is still doing most of the work: higher-for-longer rates, dollar strength, and oil-driven inflation risks are keeping crypto in a range-bound environment. Our latest commentary explains why leadership has narrowed, where relative strength is showing up, and what would need to change for BTC to break out. To see more details of our analysis, please check the post on Binance Sq…
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BinanceOTCTrading. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 404,796 of 1,584,142entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Binance OTC Trading” (@BinanceOTCTrading), 475 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BinanceOTCTrading.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.