Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐‘†โ„Ž๐‘Žโ„Ž๐‘–๐‘› ๐ด๐‘™๐‘๐‘œ๐‘Ÿ๐‘Ž #๐—•๐—ฎ๐˜†๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ #๐™๐š๐ง๐ฒ๐š๐ญ #๐‘๐จ๐ฅ๐ž๐ฏ๐ข๐ค

Channel

๐‘†โ„Ž๐‘Žโ„Ž๐‘–๐‘› ๐ด๐‘™๐‘๐‘œ๐‘Ÿ๐‘Ž #๐—•๐—ฎ๐˜†๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ #๐™๐š๐ง๐ฒ๐š๐ญ #๐‘๐จ๐ฅ๐ž๐ฏ๐ข๐ค

@Biker_love

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

53subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003951115600
TypeChannel
Username@Biker_love
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded15 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Biker_love

Growth

5315 Aug 2026, 04:02 โ€” 53 subscribers16 Aug 2026, 01:54 โ€” 53 subscribers15 Aug 2026, 04:0216 Aug 2026, 01:54
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 52โ€“54 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 01:5453no change
15 Aug 2026, 04:0253first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 August 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
20.8%
avg views รท 53 subscribers
Avg views / post
11.1
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
โ€”
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held20 (14 August 2026 โ€“ 14 August 2026)
Views total221
Reactions totalโ€”
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 04:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
16s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ€” not this channelโ€™s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโ€™s own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ‰ˆ mark.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 22:30 UTC10 viewsread 15 August 2026

ะšะพะผัƒ ะผะพะถะฝะพ ะฟะพะถะฐะปะพะฒะฐั‚ัŒัั

14 Aug 2026, 22:29 UTC10 viewsread 15 August 2026

ะฏ ะฝะฐั…ัƒะน ะฝะฐ ัƒะดะธะฒะปะตะฝะธะต ะทะฐะผะตั€ะท ะฟั€ะธ ั‚ะตะผะฟะตั€ะฐั‚ัƒั€ะต +11, ะธ ัƒ ะผะตะฝั ะบะฐะบ ั€ะฐะท ะพั‚ะบั€ั‹ั‚ะพ ะฝะตะผะฝะพะณะพ ะพะบะฝะพ, ะธ ั‚ัƒั‚ ัั‚ะพ ั‡ัƒะดะพ

14 Aug 2026, 22:28 UTC10 viewsread 15 August 2026

ะั…ัƒะตั‚ัŒ ะฟั€ะพัั‚ะพ

14 Aug 2026, 22:25 UTC9 viewsread 15 August 2026

ะ˜ ัะดะพั…ะฝะตัˆัŒ ะธะปะธ ะฝะต?

14 Aug 2026, 22:24 UTC9 viewsread 15 August 2026

ะ ั‚ะพะบ ะธะท ะทะฐั€ัะดะบะธ ะถั‘ัั‚ะบะพ ั…ั€ะตะฝะฐั‡ะธั‚?

14 Aug 2026, 20:54 UTC10 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

@m3fedr0noVBill ะ—ะดั€ะฐะฒัั‚ะฒัƒะน ะบะพั‚ะธะบ, ั‚ั‹ ะฟะพะฟะฐะป ะฒ ะผะพะน ะบะฐะฝะฐะป, ั ั€ะพะปัŒัŽ ะšั€ะฐัะฝะพะฒะฐ, ะฟะพะดั€ัƒะถะธะผัั? ะะฐะดะตัŽััŒ ั‚ะตะฑะต ั‚ัƒั‚ ะฟะพะฝั€ะฐะฒะธั‚ัั ะธ ะฝะต ะฒั‹ะนะดะตัˆัŒ ะงะฐะน? ะšะพั„ะต? ะะปะบะพะณะพะปัŒ?

14 Aug 2026, 20:39 UTC10 viewsread 15 August 2026

ะœะฝะต ะฑะตะทัƒะผะฝะพ ะฟะพะฒะตะทะปะพ ั ะฝะตะน

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Biker_love. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollโ€™s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

14 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTCAnonymous Poll6 voters

ะงะตะณะพ ั…ะพั‚ะธั‚ะต

  1. ะกั‚ะด33%
  2. ะััะพั†ะธะฐั†ะธั0%
  3. ะกะฟะปะตั‚ะฝะธ0%
  4. ะจะฐะณะธ0%
  5. ะจะธะฟั‹0%
  6. ะฏ ะธ ะบั‚ะพ0%
  7. ะกั‚ะธะบะตั€ั‹17%
  8. ะะฝะพะฝ ั€ะฐะทะณะพะฒะพั€ั‹0%
  9. + ะตัะปะธ ะฒะปัŽะฑะปะตะฝ33%
  10. ะžะฟั€ะพัั‹ ะฝะฐัะบะพะปัŒะบะพ ะฒั‹ ะผะตะฝั ะทะฝะฐะตั‚ะต17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only โ€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionโ€™s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโ€™s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank โ€” 1,172,051 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโ€™s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐‘†โ„Ž๐‘Žโ„Ž๐‘–๐‘› ๐ด๐‘™๐‘๐‘œ๐‘Ÿ๐‘Ž #๐—•๐—ฎ๐˜†๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ #๐™๐š๐ง๐ฒ๐š๐ญ #๐‘๐จ๐ฅ๐ž๐ฏ๐ข๐คโ€ (@Biker_love), 53 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Biker_love.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.