Channel
@BigLittle_run
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
395subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003031186212 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BigLittle_run |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BigLittle_run |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:14 | 395 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:08 | 396 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:51 | 397 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:19 | 397 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 22 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
222 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 97 | 43.7% | |
| 🔥 | 66 | 29.7% | |
| 👍 | 31 | 14.0% | |
| 💯 | 12 | 5.41% | |
| 🏆 | 11 | 4.95% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 1.35% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 0.901% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 222 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 22 November 2025 to 14 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Очень хочется поделиться недавним успехом нашего юного, 44-летнего кадета. Недавно, а именно 5 января, в нашем родном г. Курске проходили соревнования на 10 км. Условия, сразу скажу, были не тепличные. Во-первых, преодолеть следовало 50 кругов, а во-вторых, 100 виражей, построенных не по самым мировым стандартам. На темпе 3'10–3'20 уже приходится себя придерживать, чтобы остаться на своей дорожке, а не вылететь с не…
🔥17❤14
#little После каждого сезона, особенно если он прошел не особо удачно, хочется к новому прийти максимально усиленной версией себя. Вот и сейчас, поискав свои "Ахиллесовые пяты", нашел Ахиллесовые сухожилия. Не хватает мне прыгучих, мощных, эффективных, взрывных мышечно-сухожильных комплексов в стопе, голеностопе, а возможно и коленях. Особенно явно я это вижу, сравнивая свою технику бега с африканской элитой како…
❤20💯12👍5🥰3
#Little Отчет с дорожки «5 вёрст» минувшей субботы. Как и писал выше, мы с нашим кадетом Александром планировали преодолеть 5 км за 17:40, то есть со средней скоростью 3:32 на км. Я выступал в роли пейсмейкера. Результат эксперимента таков - 18 минут 24 секунды были зафиксированы на финишной черте. (По 3.40-41 на 1км) Вот факторы, которые могли повлиять на результат: 1. Первый и самый главный: лимитирование дыхател…
👍7❤1
5 км 16.24 Личный рекорд у Сергея сегодня на 5 верстах 🥳🥳🥳 Решили с нашим кадетом перед вынужденной двухнедельной паузой в тренировках сделать две контрольных пятерки в удовольствие. Ждем следующую субботу и новый PB
❤13🔥6🏆1
#little Одно из разновидностей упражнений на пресс, которое делаем мы сами и даём своим атлетам. Саша, на удивление, быстро смог его освоить и может делать очень продолжительные подходы. Скорее всего, сказались его самостоятельные занятия в тренажёрном зале, более лёгкие упражнения на пресс, которые я ему довольно давно даю, и, конечно же, огромный бэкграунд из профессиональных занятий танцами, развивший высокую к…
❤13🏆9👍7
4 быстрых бегуна, у каждого сумасшедшие личные рекорды Элиуд Кипчоге, Андреас Алмгрен, Якоб Киплимо, Якоб Ингебригтсен Что думаете по технике бега, есть общие черты или у всех разная? Пишите свое мнение в комментариях
❤6
#little Сегодня помогал нашему кадету Роману подобрать нужный темп на интервальной работе. Придя домой и отсмотрев видео с тренировки, с удивлением обнаружил, что буквально за несколько тренировок, посвященных технике, его бег стал ближе к тому идеалу "позного", естественного бега, к которому стремлюсь я сам. Критерии, по которым я это увидел: 1. Постановка опорной ноги практически под центр тяжести тела 2. Менее …
🔥12❤11❤🔥2
Ловите подборку видео о пользе закаливания: https://youtu.be/z7f-oHfK3Zc?si=jD4VvrYLdcooLWEd https://youtu.be/u9ldgu3PkJo?si=cUYoF_d6ZPT1h6_9 https://youtu.be/zo-Qs6X8pHg?si=mdBrg6-WwDi0tBAP
🔥3🏆1
Раз уж у нас в последнее время стало так много контента, посвященного холододовым процедурам, то хочу показать, что думает искусственный интеллект по этому поводу (ИИ: Perplexity, версия: PRO) 🔎 Запрос: Дай мне рекомендации по использованию процедур с холодной или ледяной водой для спорта (лёгкая атлетика), основанные на последних авторитетных исследованиях. Дай рекомендации как для холодных ванн, так и для душа. …
❤10👍3🔥2
Как думаете, кто просидел дольше?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Video, posted without a caption
👍7
Сегодня помогли с @Grigory_Skvortsov Веронике поставить рекорд 5 Вёрст (5км) по всей России! Теперь новый рекорд составляет 16'40 🔥 Примечательно, что сегодня же Надя Сизова (новое громкое имя в шоссейном беге) пробежала 16'41 и всего секунду уступила нашей Нике. Будет ли Надежда через неделю отвоёвывать рекорд? Поживем, увидим, будет интересно !
🔥26❤9👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @BigLittle_run. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как думаете, кто просидел дольше?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 22 November 2025 to 14 January 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,221,675 of 1,629,518 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BigLittle Run” (@BigLittle_run), 395 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BigLittle_run.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.