Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BiTGApps Release

Channel

BiTGApps Release

@BiTGAppsOfficial

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Cite this entry

2,481subscribers

-14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001140444721
TypeChannel
Username@BiTGAppsOfficial
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 October 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/BiTGAppsOfficial

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@BiTGAppsOfficial/523 · this entry14 Feb 2026, 09:39 UTC@bitgapps_downloads_official/9914 Feb 2026, 09:39 UTC1.00under a minute
@BiTGAppsOfficial/525 · this entry14 Feb 2026, 11:36 UTC@bitgapps_downloads_official/10114 Feb 2026, 12:09 UTC1.0033 minutes
@BiTGAppsOfficial/527 · this entry9 Mar 2026, 09:30 UTC@bitgapps_downloads_official/1039 Mar 2026, 09:30 UTC1.00under a minute
@BiTGAppsOfficial/536 · this entry11 Apr 2026, 09:29 UTC@bitgapps_downloads_official/11111 Apr 2026, 09:29 UTC1.00under a minute
@BiTGAppsOfficial/540 · this entry17 May 2026, 14:57 UTC@bitgapps_downloads_official/11517 May 2026, 14:57 UTC1.00under a minute
@BiTGAppsOfficial/542 · this entry22 May 2026, 10:07 UTC@bitgapps_downloads_official/11722 May 2026, 10:07 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@bitgapps_downloads_official12 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (11–1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 13 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 February 2026 to 17 June 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @BiTGAppsOfficial — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

2,4812,4962,488.57 August 2026 — 2,495 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,493 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,491 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,494 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,495 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,496 subscribers22 August 2026 — 2,492 subscribers25 August 2026 — 2,490 subscribers28 August 2026 — 2,487 subscribers31 August 2026 — 2,489 subscribers4 September 2026 — 2,492 subscribers9 September 2026 — 2,487 subscribers12 September 2026 — 2,481 subscribers16 September 2026 — 2,483 subscribers6 October 2026 — 2,482 subscribers12 October 2026 — 2,481 subscribers7 August 202612 October 2026
16 measurements spanning 67 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,479–2,498 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Oct 2026, 19:382,481-1
6 Oct 2026, 03:202,482-1
16 Sept 2026, 01:362,483+2
12 Sept 2026, 19:012,481-6
9 Sept 2026, 05:372,487-5
4 Sept 2026, 07:202,492+3
31 Aug 2026, 18:152,489+2
28 Aug 2026, 09:382,487-3
25 Aug 2026, 13:352,490-2
22 Aug 2026, 16:162,492-4
19 Aug 2026, 15:362,496+1
16 Aug 2026, 19:472,495+1
13 Aug 2026, 04:352,494+3
10 Aug 2026, 09:442,491-2
7 Aug 2026, 06:202,493-2
7 Aug 2026, 00:462,495first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 5 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

17 Jun 2026, 08:29 UTC864 viewsread 7 August 2026

Updated custom build backend, now every output is displayed inside a bootstrap alert, just below the submit button. It will also disappear after few seconds. I hope you like this new addition.

29 May 2026, 14:45 UTC≈1,270 viewsread 7 August 2026

Finally enabled custom build for all android version and both platform. Previously it is exclusively available for Android 16 and arm64 platform. Running these servers costs money, and this project is entirely funded by ad revenue. If you enjoy using our work, please consider disabling your ad blocker for us. It keeps the lights on and the project free for everyone! Though I have double checked everything and creat…

27 May 2026, 16:42 UTC≈1,230 viewsread 7 August 2026

I will soon enable custom build for all supported android version and both platform. Currently it is exclusively available for Android 16 and arm64 platform. Thanks for your understanding!

27 May 2026, 11:47 UTC≈1,150 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Now you can access your custom build directly from the homepage. Just enter your username and click view files. https://bitgapps.io

22 May 2026, 10:07 UTC≈1,120 viewsread 7 August 2026

So i have re-worked the downloads section on BiTGApps website, putting everything at one place and making it easier for everyone. Although i have double checked every link, in case any download link is misplaced or does not match with selected android version, do let me know and i will fix it right away. https://bitgapps.io Thanks for your understanding!

17 May 2026, 14:57 UTC≈1,210 viewsread 7 August 2026

New update is up! * Latest changes from MAY Pixel OTA. * Custom build backend also restarted. Visit, https://bitgapps.io

5 May 2026, 18:03 UTC≈1,470 viewsread 7 August 2026

🚀 New update soon with changes from MAY Pixel OTA. 👏

26 Apr 2026, 03:04 UTC≈1,750 viewsread 7 August 2026

New update is up! * Updated versioning system. * Switched to date and time format for release assets. * Custom build backend also updated. * This update also has changes from April Pixel OTA. Visit, https://bitgapps.io

11 Apr 2026, 09:29 UTC≈1,890 viewsread 7 August 2026

Updated website with a link to README on how to download custom build after a request is made. Please check status button option. You can also access the same from build request page. Visit, https://bitgapps.io

10 Apr 2026, 14:36 UTC≈1,720 viewsread 7 August 2026

If your build is purged, you can rebuild with same username.

10 Apr 2026, 14:20 UTC≈1,640 viewsread 7 August 2026

Updated the cronjob and it won't purge older builds for now. I will find a better way to get this done.

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @BiTGAppsOfficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BiTGApps Release” (@BiTGAppsOfficial), 2,481 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BiTGAppsOfficial.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.