Channel
@BeyondTheMaskk
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
285subscribers
+163 since we began measuring on 3 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003910054139 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BeyondTheMaskk |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 29 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 3 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BeyondTheMaskk |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 02:00 | 285 | +141 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 18:20 | 144 | +22 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 23:22 | 122 | no change |
| 3 Sept 2026, 22:47 | 122 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (29 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 3,448 |
| Reactions total | 104 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 23:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
104 reactions across 18 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 50 | 48.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 11 | 10.6% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 10.6% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 10.6% | |
| 🤣 | 6 | 5.77% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 3.85% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 2.88% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 1.92% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 1.92% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 0.962% | |
| 🖕 | 1 | 0.962% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.962% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.962% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 104 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🐍 | LOKI — GOD OF MISCHIEF | 🐍 لوکی لافیسون؛ خدای شیطنت. شاهزادهای از آسگارد که همیشه میخواست چیزی بیشتر از «برادر ثور» باشد؛ باهوش، جاهطلب و غیرقابلپیشبینی؛ کسی که برای رسیدن به جایگاهی که فکر میکرد حق اوست، بارها دروغ گفت و خیانت کرد. اما لوکی فقط یک شرور ساده نبود. او همهچیز را از دست داد... قدرت، خانواده، جایگاهش و حتی تصویری که از خودش داشت. و بعد، دیگر منتظر نجات از کسی نبود. نه شرور، نه قهرمان؛ بلک…
❤2🆒1
کدوم شخصیت رو بیشتر دوست داری؟ 👇
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
👍2❤1🖕1
BEYOND THE MASK pinned a video
🕷️ SPIDER-MAN | فکت سینمایی اندرو گارفیلد قرار بود خیلی بیشتر از چیزی که روی پرده دیدیم، اسپایدرمن باشد! 🕷️ سونی برای ادامهی دنیای The Amazing Spider-Man برنامههای بزرگی داشت؛ از فیلم سوم گرفته تا گسترش بیشتر دنیای شخصیتها. اما بعد از عملکرد ناامیدکنندهی قسمت دوم، این مسیر ناگهان متوقف شد. یعنی ممکن بود ماجراهای پیتر پارکرِ اندرو گارفیلد تازه اول راهش باشد... 🥲 📚 مرجع: The Amazing Spider-Man 2 (2014) 🎬 کارگرد…
😢4❤🔥2💔2❤1😁1
صبح بخیر، از طرف خدای شیطنت. 🐍☀️ @BeyondTheMaskk
🤣6❤2👍1
🇺🇸 | CAPTAIN AMERICA —FIRST AVENGER | A HERO | 🇺🇸 کاپیتان آمریکا کیست؟ استیو راجرز فقط یک ابرسرباز با یک سپر نیست. او پسری لاغر و ضعیف از بروکلین بود که با وجود جثهاش، همیشه میخواست از آدمهای ضعیفتر از خودش دفاع کند. همین روحیه باعث شد وارد پروژهی «سوپر سرباز» شود و به کاپیتان آمریکا تبدیل شود. اما چیزی که استیو راجرز را قهرمان کرد، سرم نبود؛ قلب و انتخابهایش بود. او در جنگ جهانی دوم جنگید، در یخ منجمد شد…
❤4👍2
🇺🇸 | FACT میدونستی که... کریس اوانز برای قبول نقش کاپیتان آمریکا، اولش حسابی دودل بود؟ اون چند بار پیشنهاد مارول رو رد کرد، چون راستش از بزرگی پروژه و فشاری که ممکن بود با بازی در نقش یکی از معروفترین ابرقهرمانهای دنیا روی دوشش بیاد، میترسید. حتی خودش بعدها گفت که این تصمیم براش آسون نبود. ولی خب... آخرش قبول کرد و شد استیو راجرزی که همه میشناسیم. 🫡🛡️ حالا تصور کن اگه همون موقع برای آخرین بار میگفت: «نه، نمیخ…
👍3❤2
It’s more than a shield. It’s a symbol @BeyondTheMaskk
❤3🔥3
❄️ | WINTER SOLDIER — JAMES BUCHANAN BARNES | 🤯🦾❄️ باکی بارنز؛ سرباز، قهرمان و بهترین دوست استیو راجرز. مردی که در جنگ جهانی دوم در کنار کاپیتان آمریکا جنگید، اما پس از سقوط از قطار، به دست هیدرا افتاد و از او سرباز زمستان ساخته شد؛ یک قاتل بیرحم که سالها تحت شستوشوی مغزی، برای مأموریتهایی که خودش انتخاب نکرده بود، استفاده میشد. اما پشت آن بازوی فلزی و آن گذشتهی خونین، هنوز باکی بارنز وجود داشت. قهرمانی که …
❤🔥5❤3🤯3
💀 DARK FACT | THE WINTER SOLDIER باکی بارنز،فقط برای کشتن ساخته نشده بود؛ هیدرا از او برای مأموریتهای فوقمحرمانهای استفاده میکرد که حتی ردپایی از خودش باقی نمیگذاشت. او برای هیدرا یک سرباز معمولی نبود؛ سلاحی بود که قرار بود هیچکس حتی نداند وجود دارد. 🦾❄️ @BeyondTheMaskk
🔥5❤3🥰1
THE Winter Soldier I’m with you till the end of the line. 🦾❄️
❤🔥4❤2🔥1
GHOST RIDER | JOHNNY BLAZE 💀🔥 او قهرمان نیست... او چیزی است که وقتی گناه از حد بگذرد، از جهنم بیرون میآید. جانی بلیز مردی بود که با شیطان معامله کرد و بهایش را با روح خودش پرداخت؛ حالا شبها جمجمهاش شعلهور میشود و روح انتقام کنترل بدنش را به دست میگیرد. زنجیر جهنمی، آتش مقدس و Penance Stare؛ قدرتی که گناهکار را وادار میکند تمام رنجی را که به دیگران تحمیل کرده، خودش تجربه کند. Ghost Rider دنبال عدالت نیست...…
❤4👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BeyondTheMaskk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
کدوم شخصیت رو بیشتر دوست داری؟ 👇
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BEYOND THE MASK” (@BeyondTheMaskk), 285 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BeyondTheMaskk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.