💳.
🥰7❤4🔥4❤🔥3

Channel
@BetterCallTonny
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
867subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002435486386 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BetterCallTonny |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 3 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BetterCallTonny |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:18 | 867 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 868 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:02 | 868 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:22 | 867 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 3 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
257 reactions across 9 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 66 | 25.7% | |
| custom 5440450999581952293 | 58 | 22.6% | |
| custom 5413553272969520322 | 30 | 11.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 18 | 7.00% | |
| 🤔 | 16 | 6.23% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 5.84% | |
| ✍ | 12 | 4.67% | |
| ❤ | 7 | 2.72% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 2.72% | |
| 🤓 | 5 | 1.95% | |
| 🤝 | 5 | 1.95% | |
| custom 5406979726738746403 | 3 | 1.17% | |
| 🌚 | 3 | 1.17% | |
| 🤡 | 3 | 1.17% | |
| 💩 | 2 | 0.778% | |
| 🤨 | 2 | 0.778% | |
| 🤮 | 2 | 0.778% | |
| custom 5469774158650942877 | 1 | 0.389% | |
| custom 5471883477219549006 | 1 | 0.389% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.389% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 257reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 3 March 2025 to 8 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💳.
🥰7❤4🔥4❤🔥3
Всех девочек поздравляю с праздником 🥰 Цветите и украшайте этот мир 🤭
❤🔥10👍4❤1
Не, ну пендосы американцы тупые конечно. Зачем у пехоты и морпехов разные бронежилеты делать 😅 IMTV (Improved Modular Tactical Vest) – это усовершенствованный модульный тактический бронежилет, используемый Корпусом морской пехоты США. Он был разработан для замены предыдущей модели MTV (Modular Tactical Vest). IMTV был разработан как ответ на жалобы военнослужащих на излишний вес и неудобство MTV. Принят на вооружени…
🤔10👍8custom 54135532729695203223❤1🔥1
Минутка интересных фактов 🚬 (Никаких предрассудков, лишь интересные факты которые вы могли не знать). Вы когда нибудь задумывались о том что некоторые вещи внешне очень разные, а по факту являются «очень близкими родственниками» ?) Речь идёт про некоторые винтовки и автоматы, а именно про американскую винтовку M1 Garand и Автомат Калашникова. Если взглянуть на разобранные М1 и АК то можно сначала слегка, а потом уж…
custom 541355327296952032224custom 544045099958195229318👍10
Кто ты, воин?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🤔6✍3🌚3custom 54069797267387464032
У меня снова интересный контент от подписчика из жарких стран. На этот раз не снаряжение, я думаю вы по картинке поймете и так, но для затравочки чуть чуть закину ее, пока готовлю интересную писанину 🚬 Накидываем реакций для скорейшего получения контента🚬
custom 544045099958195229331🤓5🤝5🤨2custom 54135532729695203222😱1custom 54697741586509428771custom 54718834772195490061
Есть тут один умелец, занимается хенд-мейдом, делает эксклюзивные дизайнерские кружки. Кому стало интересно, заходите в канал Логово Варга😊 Там можно и подарок к грядущему 8 марта посмотреть, или заказать особенный эксклюзив 😏
👍10❤🔥5🔥5🤡3💩2🤮2custom 54069797267387464031
Братва, я помню писал статейку «Кевлар v.s. СВМПЭ» и не раскрыл тему почему СВМПЭ лучше не использовать в паховой и воротниковой зоне. Нашел материал который я готовил, лучше поздно чем никогда 🚬 1. Устойчивость к многократным попаданиям и осколкам СВМПЭ демонстрирует отличные баллистические свойства против пуль, но его способность противостоять множественным поражающим элементам ниже, чем у арамидных материалов. Пр…
👍16✍8custom 54404509995819522935
Про первый эшелон мы разобрали, а второй как то обошли стороной. Не справедливо, нужно исправлять ситуацию 🚬 Основа: Чехол Панцырь от ССО ~12.000 рублей Набор КАП ~4.000 рублей Фронт: Подсумок под 4 магазина АК -3.000 рублей Левый камербанд: Нож в ножнах ~ не знаю Утилитарный подсумок ~2.000 рублей Подсумок под рацию ~2.000 рублей Правый камербанд: Универсальный подсумок (магазин, фонарик, что угодно по габаритам…
👍18🔥5custom 54404509995819522934✍1❤1custom 54135532729695203221
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @BetterCallTonny. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Кто ты, воин?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 3 March 2025 to 8 March 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Лучше звоните Тони” (@BetterCallTonny), 867 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BetterCallTonny.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.