Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Beth into smth

Channel

Beth into smth

@Beth_into_smth

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

80subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001337091191
TypeChannel
Username@Beth_into_smth
DescriptionThe idea is to remain in a state of constant departure while always arriving. Saves on introductions and good-byes. The ride does not require an explanation. Just occupants. © Richard Stuart Linklater
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Beth_into_smth

Growth

8011 Aug 2026, 21:17 — 80 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 21:30 — 80 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 21:1711 Aug 2026, 21:30
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 79–81 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 21:3080no change
11 Aug 2026, 21:1780first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
86.3%
avg views ÷ 80 subscribers
Avg views / post
69.0
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.15%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held20 (10 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total1,104
Reactions total23
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 21:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
184
Videos
15
Links
41

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

28 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1242.9%
😁1139.3%
🔥414.3%
😢13.57%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 03:12 UTC38 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Мы проебали фестиваль, буквально, вообще не шучу. Мне 37, ему 45, я ни разу в жизни так много не трахалась. Поразительно.

3😁1

8 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC39 viewsread 11 August 2026

Истории с этой поездки я буду рассказывать еще лет 10.

7 Aug 2026, 07:34 UTC54 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Мое величество согласилось остаться жрать только в третьем кабаке.

😁2

7 Aug 2026, 03:23 UTC55 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Ну мы начали путешествие на Лётчик. Не поминайте лихом)

🔥1😢1

2 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC92 viewsread 11 August 2026

Я сейчас умру от восторга, всё, что написано на картине «Крик» личные наблюдения. Там вулкан извергался, поэтому небо красное, мумию привезли на выставку ровно с таким лицом, а место просто, где он гулял. А ещё Геббельс написал Мунку, что он лучший художник Германии. И ничего, что это Фьорды, и он норвежец.

2 Aug 2026, 09:13 UTC88 viewsread 11 August 2026

В подкасте про туалет я узнала о существовании подкаста «искусство для пацанчиков». Про классическую живопись. Очень бодро. Ну, если вы переживаете женский голос. Я обычно с трудом, но эта девка не бесит. И говорит почти на фене, нет, но ощущение, что ей 18. Дочь моего друга этого возраста иногда так разговаривает.

1 Aug 2026, 15:46 UTC70 viewsread 11 August 2026

Пути подкастов неисповедимы, отошла от заката империи и бесконечных маньяков, и внезапно слушаю подкаст «толчок», натурально про туалеты. Примерно 600к россиян не имеют туалета даже во дворе. Сегодня. Даже в городах типа Чита. Не в захолустной деревне. Зато в 94 году у Диброва был золотой унитаз. Я фигею. Очень крутая документалка.

1 Aug 2026, 12:20 UTC70 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

От нефиг делать решила попробовать писать сюда почаще. Вспомнила тут сюжет вчера. Продолжаем про котов, но тут настало время охуительных историй. У меня есть очень близкая подруга, а у нее был коллега, и они переспали, а потом, скажем так, мы с ним подружились. И у нас возник такой же позыв. Я очень вежливо спросила, не будет ли она против, а романа там не случилось. Мне дали добро и я приехала к нему в гости. Мальчи

2

31 Jul 2026, 20:09 UTC50 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Продолжим про котов. Когда мне совсем плохо, я его даже не обнимаю, я его заграбастываю и прижимаю к себе всего, целиком, а он начинает мурчать, и мне становится не так безысходно. Мы так и засыпаем.

4

31 Jul 2026, 14:31 UTC53 viewsread 11 August 2026

Они там что-то разбирают слов, как пятилетний ребенок.

31 Jul 2026, 14:29 UTC58 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Коты мои любимые животные, ну, помимо людей. Если Геббельсу сказать, что я его, вот именно его, Геббельса люблю, его можно даже не гладить, он начинает мурлыкать.

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Beth_into_smth. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,480,137 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Beth into smth” (@Beth_into_smth), 80 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Beth_into_smth.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.