2 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 121–122 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 09:32
121
-1
11 Aug 2026, 15:16
122
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 6 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
191 reactions across 12 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5413751992516370805
34
17.8%
custom 5381820143326226834
33
17.3%
custom 5377382707670052032
21
11.0%
custom 5377424652320667528
17
8.90%
custom 5375549486779101971
16
8.38%
custom 5413573334761757427
10
5.24%
custom 5413561347508035878
9
4.71%
custom 5413568842225966710
9
4.71%
custom 5237768709744911022
7
3.66%
custom 5316930493223025689
5
2.62%
custom 5350618807943576963
5
2.62%
custom 5381993264867989953
4
2.09%
custom 5206223699669177647
3
1.57%
custom 5415737766350710094
3
1.57%
custom 5416112210189511507
3
1.57%
custom 5308048225976992560
2
1.05%
custom 5314655676679604448
2
1.05%
custom 5381836846454037080
2
1.05%
custom 5382355347790910074
2
1.05%
custom 5416117754992288002
2
1.05%
2 further kinds
2
1.05%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 191reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 October 2025 to 8 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
12,811
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 20 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
12,800
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @BestRoplayer. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 October 2025 to 8 November 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
😞🔤се деньги вернулись домой,
😞🔤се звезды нашлись здесь.
ᅠᅠ┈─────┈ 💵 ┈─────┈
ᅠ🔤аконец-то! Мы сделали это. Как и обещали, возврат всех ваших средств осуществлен всем отметившимся людям.
ᅠ🔤емного о причинах задержки вывода средств...
ᅠ🔤ух, это было действительно непросто. Комиссия сожрала не самую приятную сумму, и сказать честно, я искренне надеюсь что никогда не буду иметь дела с биржами.
ᅠᅠ┈─────┈ 🐾 ┈─────┈
🔤анал вн…
🌟: Уже заметили? Правила отредактированы, отныне в нашем канале удалена вся система донатных реакций и бустов, а так же дополнительные голоса за это.
ᅠᅠ┈─────┈ 🤩┈─────┈
Думаю, все поняли с чем именно это было связано, но все же, я бы хотела публично высказаться на жту тему.
Сказать честно, сначала для меня это было не более чем хиханьки да хаханьки и гениальной тактикой по заработку звезд, но все зашло слишком дале…
🌟: Во первых, скучаю без предложки, во вторых опрос, нужен ли вам пост с апелляцией?💤 Это будет возможность запросить пересчёт голосов на тот случай, если вы остались не согласны с выставлеными голосами / нужно переизбрать победителя. 🔄
✔️Хорошая идея, это полезно и при необходимости я воспользуюсь этим.77%
❌Не думаю что это нуждается в осуществлении, сделать такой запрос можно везде, где увидят админы.23%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
⌗ ⭐⭐⠘ ЛУЧШИЙ РОЛЕВИК ЗА НИН ГУАН. ❞ ?!
ᅠᅠ › 🤩егодня торжественное поздравление с вручением грамоты посвящается... — Нимфоманка.‼️ Набрав 230 голосов ты выбился вперёд и победил, и это твоя заслуга!
( ✶ ⥂ BOOST / ПРАВИЛА ⥂ ✶ )
✨➰ (T.ME/BESTROPLAYER) ➰✨
⌗ 🌟🌟⠘ ЛУЧШИЙ РОЛЕВИК ЗА ХАНАКО КУНА. ❞ ?!
ᅠᅠ › 🤩егодня торжественное поздравление с вручением грамоты посвящается... ⏤͟͟ 𝘁𝘀𝘂𝗺↺ 𝕯𝐀𝐔𝐒𝐓 #THNK S̷͊𝐨𝐧 #STRF.‼️ Набрав 7 голосов ты выбился вперёд и победил, и это твоя заслуга!
( ✶ ⥂ BOOST / ПРАВИЛА ⥂ ✶ )
✨➰ (T.ME/BESTROPLAYER) ➰✨
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BestRoplayer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🌟: Во первых, скучаю без предложки, во вторых опрос, нужен ли вам пост с апелляцией?💤 Это будет возможность запросить пересчёт голосов на тот случай, если вы остались не согласны с выставлеными голосами / нужно переизбрать победителя. 🔄
✔️Хорошая идея, это полезно и при необходимости я воспользуюсь этим.77%
❌Не думаю что это нуждается в осуществлении, сделать такой запрос можно везде, где увидят админы.23%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 October 2025 to 8 November 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,332,447 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
3
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
3
vacant every time we have ever looked
@BestRoplayer named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@n1mf4m named in 2 posts, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
@stim_cer named in 2 posts, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
@vqcxv named in 2 posts, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ᅠ#1 𝖡𝖤𝖲𝖳 𝖱𝖮𝖫𝖤𝖯𝖫𝖠𝖸𝖤𝖱 ᥫ᭡” (@BestRoplayer), 121 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BestRoplayer.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
