2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 55–57 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 06:30
56
no change
12 Aug 2026, 06:16
56
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 1 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
212
Videos
44
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
47 reactions across 17 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
38
80.9%
👍
5
10.6%
🕊
2
4.26%
🌚
1
2.13%
😍
1
2.13%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 February 2025 to 1 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
• ﷽ •
انجمن علمی زبان انگلیسی
پردیس بنت الهدی صدر برگزار میکند:
Commencez aujourd’hui, parlez demain!
🇫🇷 سلسله کارگاه آموزش زبان فرانسوی
با تدریس جناب آقای دکتر احمدی
📌 شنبه و دوشنبه
⏰ ساعت ۹:۳۰
همراه با صدور گواهی حضور
🔵 مختص دانشجویان رشته آموزش زبان انگلیسی پردیس بنت الهدی صدر
🎓 English Club
✾ Bent Al-Hoda Sadr of Sanandaj
✾ @BentEnglishClub
#Grammar
📚 عبارت Speaking of:
📌 حین صحبت کردن ممکنه پیش بیاد که یه کلمه یا جملهای ما رو یاد یه کسی، یه چیزی یا یه موضوع دیگهای میندازه، در چنین مواقعی میگیم “راستی حالا که صحبتش شد” یا “حالا که حرفش شد این رو هم بگم که …” و چیزی که به خاطرمون اومده رو بیان میکنیم. عبارت “حالا که صحبتش شد” در زبان انگلیسی معادل هست با:
• Speaking of which/that, …
همچنین اگه بخوایم مشخصا به کسی یا چیزی اشاره کنیم میتونیم بگیم:
•…
• ﷽ •
💛| میلاد دوازدهمین گل بوستان امامت و ولایت
حضرت مهدی موعود(عج) مبارڪ باد.
انجمن علمی زبان انگلیسی
🎓 English Club
✾ Bent Al-Hoda Sadr of Sanandaj
✾ @BentEnglishClub
#Idiom
It's a piece of cake
Meaning: very easy
اصطلاح فارسی مشابه:مثل آب خوردن میمونه.
معنی: آسان بودن کاری
Example: The exam was a piece of cake.
مثال: امتحان خیلی آسون بود( امتحان مثل آب خوردن بود)
🎓 English Club
✾ Bent Al-Hoda Sadr of Sanandaj
✾ @BentEnglishClub
#idiom
"In the long run"
🔹 معنی: در بلندمدت، در آیندهای دور
🔹 مثال:
"If you study hard now, it will pay off in the long run!"
(اگر الان سخت درس بخوانی، در بلندمدت نتیجهاش را خواهی دید!)
🎓 English Club
✾ Bent Al-Hoda Sadr of Sanandaj
✾ @BentEnglishClub
• ﷽ •
✨| میلاد باسعادت حضرت علی اکبر (ع) و روز جوان را تبریک میگوییم.
انجمن علمی زبان انگلیسی
🎓 English Club
✾ Bent Al-Hoda Sadr of Sanandaj
✾ @BentEnglishClub
🫧تفاوت ظریف بین "will" و "be going to"
در سوال اول بعضی از افراد "will" را انتخاب کردهاند که اشتباه نیست، اما "be going to" مناسبتر است. چرا؟
"Be going to"
برای پیشبینیهایی استفاده میشود که بر اساس شواهد موجود انجام شدهاند. در این جمله، ما میتوانیم ببینیم که ماشینها در حال حرکت به سمت هم هستند، پس احتمال تصادف زیاد است. بنابراین:
"They are going to crash!"
(شواهد نشان میدهند که این اتفاق خواهد افتاد.)…
2️⃣ A: I forgot to bring my phone charger.
B: No problem! I __ (lend) you mine.
will86%
am going to14%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BentEnglishClub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
1️⃣ Look at those cars! They __ (crash) if they don't stop!
will78%
are going to22%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 February 2025 to 1 November 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,377,389 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“انجمن علمی زبان انگلیسی” (@BentEnglishClub), 56 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BentEnglishClub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.