Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ben the Brit

Channel

Ben the Brit

@BenTheBrit

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

202subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002413541951
TypeChannel
Username@BenTheBrit
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/BenTheBrit

Growth

197202199.56 August 2026 — 197 subscribers7 August 2026 — 197 subscribers13 August 2026 — 202 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 196–203 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 12:17202+5
7 Aug 2026, 04:33197no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:23197first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 7 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
74.5%
avg views ÷ 202 subscribers
Avg views / post
151
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.74%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held17 (7 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total2,107
Reactions total142
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 04:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

173 reactions across 16 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9353.8%
🔥2514.5%
😁148.09%
👍137.51%
🤣137.51%
🙏95.20%
💯21.16%
🍾10.578%
🎉10.578%
👌10.578%
😱10.578%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 173reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC72 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥7🤣1

2 Aug 2026, 14:11 UTC113 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🤣9👍4🔥2👌1

1 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC126 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

People often say Russia is a cheap country to live in but is that really true? 🤑 In today's video we'll explore that, seeing whether two people can survive on 500 rubles per day! You'll also see what food we make with the ingredients we bought, showing off my wife's amazing culinary skills 🧑‍🍳 Watch the video here

🔥64💯2

31 Jul 2026, 20:52 UTC140 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

For anyone curious, here’s another little teaser for tomorrow’s video 😎

👍54😱1

31 Jul 2026, 18:02 UTC135 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Editing the latest video as my beautiful wife makes fresh pie for us… life has never been so sweet ❤️

13

30 Jul 2026, 12:42 UTC173 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

His Instagram and YouTube might have bigger followings than me, but at least on Telegram we’re peers now 😉 It’s all fun and games though, go and follow him if you haven’t already

7🤣3

27 Jul 2026, 17:08 UTC177 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

I decided to make a reel about today’s ordeal 🤳 I don’t normally make shorts or reels, but I felt like getting into it. Please tell me what you think, and if you’ve had success with short form content then give me any tips you have! 🙏 📹Follow me on YouTube 💬Follow me on Telegram 🖼Follow me on Instagram

9

27 Jul 2026, 11:46 UTC146 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

9

26 Jul 2026, 11:55 UTC161 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Congratulations to my good friend Afrolev for his insane Instagram growth! 🎉 He’s such a genuine guy, and completely deserves all the success he gets. Check him out here: 📹YouTube 💬Telegram 🖼Instagram

7

25 Jul 2026, 16:35 UTC163 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

I just had a great interview with Katya from RTVI! 😎 Both her and her cameraman, Viktor Tsoi (real name Sasha), were amazing to work with. Both of them were very professional and fun to be around, and I hope their project will all go according to plan ❤️ Once this project is released, I’ll let you all know about it, if you’re interested to see. I’d recommend looking at her other work if you get the chance. 📹Follow

7🔥3

24 Jul 2026, 16:21 UTC158 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Here's an exclusive sneak peek at a new video we filmed today 👀 What do you all think? Is this a topic you're looking forward to seeing? 📹Follow me on YouTube 💬Follow me on Telegram 🖼Follow me on Instagram

🔥42👍1

22 Jul 2026, 17:30 UTC220 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

How many people here have visited the legendary Hero City of Tula? 🇷🇺 This incredibly important city lies on the southern approaches to Moscow, guarding it from invaders for centuries ⚔️ However, Tula isn’t just famous for its military history, it’s also the originator of two culturally significant exports. Those being the famous Tula gingerbread (pryanik), and the Tula Samovar! 🌟🥨 My video from this amazing place

5🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @BenTheBrit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

15 Jul 2026, 19:43 UTCFinal Results24 voters

Who’re you all supporting?

  1. England 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿33%
  2. Argentina 🇦🇷29%
  3. I don’t care38%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 255,231 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ben the Brit” (@BenTheBrit), 202 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BenTheBrit.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.