Channel
@BeliyRandom
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
167subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002379489304 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BeliyRandom |
| Description | Канал о настольных играх |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BeliyRandom |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:30 | 167 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 167 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 3 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (3 April 2025 – 22 July 2026) |
| Views total | 276 |
| Reactions total | 17 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 14:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
174 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 95 | 54.6% | |
| 👍 | 49 | 28.2% | |
| ❤ | 26 | 14.9% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 1.15% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.575% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.575% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 174reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 3 April 2025 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Так вот Что такое дуэль? Че-т спровоцировало меня много всего на это, но добило, что дуэли многие воспринимают как жанр. Вот просто жанр. Типа, «посоветуй дуэль». Жанр в настолках - {{ тут опущено 3 часа споров }} это мистическая сущность, которая сводится к единственному ответу на вопрос «зачем и в каких обстоятельствах эту игру доставать с полки?» Никакого другого смысла не найдете, жанр нужен, чтобы вы понимали…
👍7🔥2
Сейчас будет мини-активность в этом блоге)0 В настолки я играть не перестал (что можно было подумать по пустоте туть), но пока полностью перестал их покупать, а еще намного меньше стал играть с людьми по сети - зато за последние месяцы переиграл почти всю коллекцию:) Трикерионы-Сэкигахары-Сумеречную-ЗВВ-ВК-Рыцарямага-Бестиарий-ТМБ-Лиссабон и вот прям почти всю остальную, это вполне прилично коробок. Интересный опыт, …
👍7😭1
Сразу к мнению! И повторюсь, субъективному мнению малоопытного в жанре игрока. Моя основная претензия к трикам - это «полноценно» сложные игры для исключительно опытных настольщиков. Если играть не сверх-осознанно, почти любой трик превращается в бессмысленный картошлеп. Чтобы в триках был смысл, нужно внимательно следить какие карты вышли, какие у кого могут быть, какие потенциально ушли изначально в сброс, если так…
❤5👍3
Кратенько про трики Подумал, что могу высказаться тут про трики, чтобы оно существовало на канале. Сразу уточню: я даже близко не опытный триколюб, играл в относительно мало коробок, поэтому это краткий пост, а не видео, но мнение сформировать, думаю, успел. Собственно, трики. Мистический жанр: опытные настольщики тратят кучу денег на коробки, внутри которых просто карты с цифрами разных мастей, выбирают эти игры над…
👍1
Мб это вообще отложенный эффект мегамаркета, все купили все настолки мира, и ямка когда-то наступить должна была. Ну и в личных итогах года кратенько напишу о своих других увлечениях. Все это время и в прошлом и позапрошлом годах я и в пк поигрывал во всякие дарксоулсы (DS1 - моя топ-1 видеоигра), и вот с прошлого года в консоли нинтендо, разжился свичом и 3дс (смело советую настольщикам кстати, нинтендо - игры про …
❤7🔥1
Итоги года! Статистику сыгранных партий я давно не веду, на тему у меня давно написан ролик, и, кажется, пора за него браться С одной стороны, этот год у меня получился менее настольным, чем прошлый и позапрошлый, но это скорее связано с тем, что в прошлый и позапрошлый я фигачил как не в себя) И партий сыграно немало за этот год, и новых игр опробовано, просто с опытом начинаю меньше удивляться каждой новой игре, а…
👍4❤3🔥2
Photo, posted without a caption
🤣1
https://youtu.be/FVU5V1IhgfM
🔥17❤5
Ролик готов Завтра часа в 4)
🔥21😱2
Довольно интересно поговорили тут про варгеймы и настолки В целом большую часть своих мыслей на тему наверное и высказал тут) (Там раздел Downfall со мной если что)
🔥3👍1
Сегодня подводим итоги прошлого месяца. Посмотрим свежим взглядом на легендарную систему от "Звезды" - Art of Tactic, разберемся в самом первом CDG в истории - Washington's War, обсудим с попаданцем отличие варгеймов от обычных настольных игр, определим является ли Triumph & Tragedy варгеймом или настолкой и конечно вновь окунемся в ОКС! Версия на ютуб https://youtu.be/KzaESy4075s
🔥5
Давно не покупал новых настолок, но гаговские скидки сделали свое дело И пишу дипломную работу в формате видеоролика по анху на 7500 слов
🔥18
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @BeliyRandom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,297,545 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Белый Рандом” (@BeliyRandom), 167 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BeliyRandom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.