Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for JORDAN

Channel

JORDAN

@BelfortSquad

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,044subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002583821149
TypeChannel
Username@BelfortSquad
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 16 May 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/BelfortSquad

Growth

1,0441,0491,046.57 August 2026 — 1,049 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,049 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,048 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,046 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,044 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,043–1,050 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 18:051,044-2
11 Aug 2026, 13:341,046-2
8 Aug 2026, 05:211,048-1
8 Aug 2026, 00:191,049no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:561,049first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

11,037 reactions across 20 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😎3,95235.8%
custom 54498002500321433743,54532.1%
custom 60237814575860332473,54032.1%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,037reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 May 2025 to 23 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1,986
across the posts below
Posts paid on
20
of 20 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
329
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @BelfortSquad. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 May 2025 to 23 December 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

23 Dec 2025, 14:48 UTC≈1,490 views56 reactions23 Starsread 8 August 2026

This channel is in the hands of a new wolf @imJordanBeIfort Are You Ready?

😎56

10 Jul 2025, 22:03 UTC≈5,140 views406 reactions54 Starsread 8 August 2026

Everyone is ready?

custom 5449800250032143374260😎146

17 Jun 2025, 21:14 UTC≈8,540 views554 reactions104 Starsread 8 August 2026

2:00 Trust me

custom 6023781457586033247266😎151custom 5449800250032143374137

13 Jun 2025, 22:19 UTC≈8,120 views586 reactions45 Starsread 8 August 2026

HELLO

custom 6023781457586033247286😎157custom 5449800250032143374143

5 Jun 2025, 13:39 UTC≈9,260 views566 reactions43 Starsread 8 August 2026

98% is ready…

custom 6023781457586033247283custom 5449800250032143374152😎131

30 May 2025, 18:54 UTC≈10,200 views520 reactions27 Starsread 8 August 2026

Soon…

😎226custom 6023781457586033247166custom 5449800250032143374128

28 May 2025, 16:21 UTC≈10,000 views473 reactions25 Starsread 8 August 2026

🫡

😎198custom 6023781457586033247155custom 5449800250032143374120

26 May 2025, 17:06 UTC≈9,560 views570 reactions329 Starsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

😎236custom 5449800250032143374172custom 6023781457586033247162

24 May 2025, 20:02 UTC≈8,780 views566 reactions34 Starsread 8 August 2026

M?

custom 6023781457586033247276😎153custom 5449800250032143374137

24 May 2025, 09:49 UTC≈8,460 views495 reactions30 Starsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 5449800250032143374212😎150custom 6023781457586033247133

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BelfortSquad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 261,714 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“JORDAN” (@BelfortSquad), 1,044 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BelfortSquad.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.