Messages in this channel will be automatically deleted after 1 day
Channel
Bebe Rexha Brasil #BETTERMISTAKES
@BebeRexhaBrasil
On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
173subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001315420991 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BebeRexhaBrasil |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 7 May 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BebeRexhaBrasil |
Previous handles
Recorded in 2019 as “Bebe Rexha Brasil” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 173 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:31 | 172 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:56 | 172 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 7 May 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 April 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
Bebe Rexha Brasil #BETTERMISTAKES pinned «https://t.me/rexhabrasil»
https://t.me/rexhabrasil
4ª crítica do #BetterMistakes: “Better Mistakes é uma aula de mestre sobre hinos. É um álbum expansivo, dirigido por e ancorado na excelente voz da cantora Albano-Americana”- The Yong Folks Pontuação: 80/100 Com isso, tudo indica que o álbum debute com 75 no meta, sua nota mais alta na plataforma.
Após um tweet do TXT recomendando o álbum, os termos 'Bebe Rexha' e 'Better Mistakes' dominam o search do Melon, um dos maiores charts coreanos.
Segura os melões da mami!!! Bebe Rexha para a Basic Magazine
O álbum da semana no spotify foi ele! #BetterMistakes
🇺🇸 iTunes US: #5. "Better Mistakes" — @BebeRexha (+1) *New Peak* Este é o primeiro projeto de Bebe a alcançar o top 5 do iTunes US (albums).
#CRÍTICA Bebe Rexha consegue mais uma nota verde ao #BetterMistakes: “A polinizadora cruzada de pop continua seu charme fragmentário. ‘Better Mistakes’ fica um pouco aquém do conselho de Beckett, mas certamente não é uma viagem inútil.” - The Forty-Five Pontuação: 70/100 Se a próxima crítica ao álbum for de uma nota superior a 25, já garantirá mais um álbum verde de Bebe no metacritic. Com uma nota superior a 45, …
Peaks no iTunes US 🇺🇸: #5 Better Mistakes #8 Expectations Peaks na Apple Music Worldwide 🌎: #5 Better Mistakes #9 Expectations
"Better Mistakes é um lançamento forte e audacioso de Rexha. Tanto pelas letras quanto pelos diferentes ritmos explorados ao longo de 13 faixas. É visível como a cantora se entrega em todos os sentidos nesse álbum, passando pelas qualidades, mas sem deixar de lado as fraquezas. Muito pelo contrário, soube mostrar como nem sempre estamos completamente bem, mas que esses momentos também são importantes para nos fazer f…
#ITUNES Após ser lançado oficialmente em todo o mundo, 'Better Mistakes' sobe 47 posições do iTunes WW 🌎 (Albums) e agora está na posição 3. O álbum ficou em #4 no iTunes da Europa. 🇪🇺
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @BebeRexhaBrasil. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,479,397 of 1,563,849entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bebe Rexha Brasil #BETTERMISTAKES” (@BebeRexhaBrasil), 173 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BebeRexhaBrasil.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.