Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for لنكن لهم زيناً

Channel

لنكن لهم زيناً

@Beagreatrepofus

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

848subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001230616324
TypeChannel
Username@Beagreatrepofus
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Beagreatrepofus

Growth

848849848.56 August 2026 — 849 subscribers6 August 2026 — 849 subscribers14 August 2026 — 848 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 848–849 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 05:38848-1
6 Aug 2026, 14:50849no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:13849first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.0%
avg views ÷ 848 subscribers
Avg views / post
110
1 post measured
Reaction rate
1.82%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held20 (20 February 202631 July 2026)
Views total110
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 14:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

72 reactions across 14 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6691.7%
👍45.56%
👏11.39%
🕊11.39%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 72reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 February 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 18:09 UTC110 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#نقطة_وهدف من القرآن الكريم

1👍1

21 Jul 2026, 18:02 UTC200 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

💡قوّةُ الكلمة (5) 🖇نماذجُ من تأثيراتِ الألفاظ: 🔹 د / للألفاظِ دورٌ في إسعادِ الحياةِ الاجتماعية، ولذا وردتِ الأوامرُ التربويةُ بإظهارِ الألفاظِ التي لها رونقٌ خاصٌ في إدخالِ السعادةِ على القلوب، 🔘 إذ إنّ الألفاظَ لها صدىً يتجاوزُ الآذانَ ليستقرَّ في القلوب، فقولُ الرجلِ لزوجته (إنّي أحِبُّكِ) لا يذهبُ من قلبِها أبدًا، ✅ والسلامُ لفظٌ يُدِرُّ المحبة، وإذا أحببتَ شخصًا فأخبره بذلك، فإنّه أدومُ للمحبة. 🕌 في روايةٍ

10

20 Jul 2026, 17:52 UTC173 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🔮 قوّةُ الكلمة (4) 📌 نماذجُ من تأثيراتِ الألفاظ: 🔹 جـ / ربَّ لفظٍ يوجِبُ السقوطَ في الهاوية، فالكذبُ والنميمةُ والغيبةُ والشتمُ والسبُّ واللعنُ وغيرُها، ⚠️ كُلُّها إفرازاتٌ فاسدةٌ للألفاظ، لذلك نجدُ التأكيدَ التربويَ الشديدَ على ضرورةِ الحفاظِ على الألفاظِ وعدم تركها تنهالُ من غيرِ قيود! 📜 عن أبي عبدِ الله (عليه السلام) قال: «قالَ أميرُ المؤمنين (صلوات الله عليه) في وصيّته لمحمدٍ بن الحنفية: 🖇 واعلمْ أنَّ اللسان

8

19 Jul 2026, 18:02 UTC147 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

💧 قوّةُ الكلمة (3) 🔆 نماذجُ من تأثيراتِ الألفاظ: إنَّ الألفاظَ تحتفظُ بأهميةٍ قصوى في الحياة، 🔻 فالألفاظُ لها مؤثّراتُها الخاصةُ دينيًا وإنسانيًا واجتماعيًا، وعلى المُستوى الفردي والاجتماعي، وهذا له شواهدُ عديدةٌ، 📌 نذكرُ منها: 🔹 أ / إنَّ الألفاظَ هي التي تجعلُ من الإنسانِ مُحرّمَ الدمِ والعرضِ والمالِ في الإسلامِ، 🖇 فإنّه بمُجرّدِ أنْ يتلفّظَ بالشهادتينِ يصبحُ مُسلمًا، له ما للمُسلمين وعليه ما عليهم، والعكسُ بال

4

18 Jul 2026, 18:02 UTC171 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

💎 قوّةُ الكلمة (2) 📁 مشاكلُ الألفاظ: ⚠️ ولا يعني هذا أنَّ الألفاظَ مُحصَّنةٌ عن المشاكل، إذا إن هناك الكثيرَ من الصعابِ والإشكالاتِ التي تواجهها: 📌 فمنها: أنَّ القُدرةَ على اختيارِ الألفاظِ لنقلِ المعنى المكنونِ تختلفُ من شخصٍ لآخر، 🖇 فقد ينقلُ شخصانِ معنىً واحدًا مكنونًا في نفسيهما، إلا أنّ أحدَهما ينقلُه بطريقةٍ احترافية، والآخر ينقلُه بطريقةٍ ساذجة. 🌐 لاحظْ مثلًا: أنَّ الشاعرَ قد ينقلُ لك معنىً بطريقةٍ تسحرك،

8👏1

17 Jul 2026, 18:01 UTC190 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

💠 قوّةُ الكلمة (1) 📁 لم يُتَحْ لنا أنْ نتعرّفَ على بواطنِ الإنسان، إذ لم نُجهّزْ تكوينًا بآلاتِ كشفِ البواطن، 〽️ ولذلك احتجْنا إلى وسيلةٍ لإبرازِ الدفائنِ والمكنوناتِ في النفس، حتى يُمكِن أنْ يكونَ التعامُلُ مُثمرًا بينَ الأطرافِ المُتكثرةِ لبني البشر. 🌀 وقد تنوّعتِ الوسائلُ لذلك، فكانتِ الإِشارةُ واحدةً من تلك الوسائل، وكانتِ الكتابةُ وسيلةً أخرى، ☑️ حتى الرسوم، كانتْ في يومٍ من الأيام وسيلةً لذلك، إلا أنّ الوسا

9

20 May 2026, 08:00 UTC675 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

ضرورة تزين المؤمن https://youtu.be/0Ni9-zYPTlM?si=9GMTysNKtcWcQ8ze لمشاهدة المحاضرة كاملة على الرابط التالي https://youtu.be/yaqDkC7ssoE?si=2tsd792QoAkryrwI

👍1

13 May 2026, 18:10 UTC539 viewsread 6 August 2026

كيف تجعل الدنيا طريقا للآخرة https://youtu.be/DH29_gpxpTM?si=PeJOJ3fMclZU-vSt لمشاهدة المحاضرة كاملة على الرابط التالي https://youtu.be/KwVcE-forjM

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Beagreatrepofus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 893,438 of 1,620,455entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“لنكن لهم زيناً” (@Beagreatrepofus), 848 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Beagreatrepofus.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.