Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Beads🌸Nosok

@BeadsNosok

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

194subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002227019368
TypeChannel
Username@BeadsNosok
DescriptionПриветик!♡ Ты попал в уютный канал про бисер🎀 **•̩̩͙✩•̩̩͙*˚ ˚*•̩̩͙✩•̩̩͙*˚* **•̩̩͙✩•̩̩͙*˚ ˚*•̩̩͙✩•̩̩͙*˚* цель: 400 подписчиков дата создания канала: 12.06 др автора: 31.01 @anastixis др админа: 25.03 @sonik_B_14 На этом всё!ᐛ
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/BeadsNosok

Growth

19411 Aug 2026, 12:50 — 194 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 13:01 — 194 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 12:5011 Aug 2026, 13:01
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 193–195 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 13:01194no change
11 Aug 2026, 12:50194first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 22 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
543
Videos
7
Links
37

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
20s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

137 reactions across 13 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52583831182466201953122.6%
💘3021.9%
2518.2%
🔥1813.1%
custom 52447900965106099601611.7%
❤‍🔥75.11%
🍓42.92%
👍21.46%
😍21.46%
💋10.73%
😁10.73%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 137reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 22 November 2025 to 3 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @BeadsNosok. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 November 2025 to 3 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Jul 2026, 04:04 UTC12 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @viksbiserokkPhoto

☕️☕️☕️☕️☕️ ☕️ ☕️☕️☕️☕️ ☕️быть подписанным на мой канал (@viksbiserokk) ☕️переслать на свой канал, если нету канала то 3 друзьям ☕️кинуть скрины первых двух пунктов ☕️скинуть пару своих работ(не коллажом) отправляя анкету, вы подтверждаете то, что успеете в срок 3 недели и у вас есть все цвета для данной фигурки🤩 я пока еще решаю судьбу схемы, но больше склоняюсь к платке всем удачии💕

29 Jun 2026, 08:58 UTC22 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

как думаете какую летнюю фигурку плету?

28 Jun 2026, 07:27 UTC15 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @Poli_bicerPhoto

🩷🎂НАБОР В ТЕСТ НА БЕГЕМОТИХУ🎂🩷 условия: 1. подписаться на меня + скрин 2. пересыл на свой канал/3 друзьям (только если нету канала) + скрин 3. скинуть свои амигуруми •плести можно любыми цветами♡ •свои детали добавить можно♡ •срок 2 недели♡ •отбор в среду♡ •схему ждать не надо♡ •тортик можно наперед♡

28 Jun 2026, 07:22 UTC26 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

😶😶😶😶😶😶😶 😶😶😶😶 p.s:много писать не буду 🟠плела по платной схеме от клубничного зайчика 🟠плетется быстро, за 5 часов 🟠теперь совушка не одна оценяйте, а я пошла дальше плести🌟

1

31 Dec 2025, 08:50 UTC209 views14 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Извините, что пропала пытаюсь вернуться к плетению Всех с наступающим!❤️

10💘3🔥1

10 Dec 2025, 04:58 UTC282 views19 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Новый пост! 🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️ ▪️плела по платной схеме, купить можно у @uliaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 🎞️ ▪️голова у меня лежала на протяжении месяца, никак руки не доходили доплести🤩 ▪️схему же мне дарила @vasyamalamala🎞️ ▪️получилась она очень красивой, мне нравится🎞️ с фоном как видите решила не заморачиваться Давайте реакций!❤️

custom 52447900965106099607🔥4💘3custom 525838311824662019521🍓1👍1

10 Dec 2025, 04:38 UTC200 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Спасибо за реакции🩷 сейчас сделаю пост)

💘32

9 Dec 2025, 03:50 UTC204 views24 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Такая миленькая💕

🔥9custom 52583831182466201955💘31🍓1👍1💋1😁1

7 Dec 2025, 07:17 UTC172 views18 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Продолжаем 😘

custom 525838311824662019511custom 52447900965106099605💘2

4 Dec 2025, 09:34 UTC180 views14 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026
Photo

Не ждали пост? Я тоже! 🔡🔡🔡🔡 🤍плела по платной схеме, зашла на ддс🩵 🤍это была моя давняя хотелка, очень рада что наконец-то ее сплела❤️ 🤍крошки помог мне выйти из выгорания💍 🤍у него очень аппетитная морковка🥰 Постораюсь быть активной почаще, чтоб канал не пустовал!🐱

custom 52583831182466201958💘31🔥1custom 52447900965106099601

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @BeadsNosok. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,420,813 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Beads🌸Nosok” (@BeadsNosok), 194 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BeadsNosok.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.