Channel
@BePRefs
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Handles named that no longer answer ยท Cite this entry
14subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001755836230 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BePRefs |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 18 January 2023โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BePRefs |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 14 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 13 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:49 | 13 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 18 January 2023 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 March 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
@ComercialXYZ ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ 10 ๐ซ๐ฝ ๐ท๐๐ ๐น$25.00 โ ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ฑ๐ ๐บ๐๐ ๐ซ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ 470 ๐ฎ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐!!! @PunishDo7
@Danidesignerofc ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ 1 ๐ซ๐ฝ ๐ท๐๐ ๐น$4.00 โ ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ฑ๐ ๐บ๐๐ ๐ซ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ 470 ๐ฎ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐!!! @PunishDo7
@LynxSTJ ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ 4 ๐ซ๐ฝ ๐ท๐๐ ๐น$15.00 โ ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ฑ๐ ๐บ๐๐ ๐ซ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ 470 ๐ฎ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐!!! @PunishDo7
@NoSpaceInfo ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ 10 ๐ซ๐ฝ ๐ท๐๐ ๐น$35.00 โ ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ฑ๐ ๐บ๐๐ ๐ซ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ 470 ๐ฎ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐!!! @PunishDo7
VOLTEI DAS MINHAS FERIAS.., DIVULGAรรO ON
+1500 Membros Entregue Com Sucesso โ ๐ Adquira jรก: @PunishDo7 ๐ @all
@playfary ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ 10 ๐ซ๐ฝ ๐ท๐๐ ๐น$25.00 โ ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ฑ๐ ๐บ๐๐ ๐ซ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ 470 ๐ฎ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐!!! @PunishDo7
@ScarecrowFTP ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ 10 ๐ซ๐ฝ ๐ท๐๐ ๐น$35.00 โ ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ฑ๐ ๐บ๐๐ ๐ซ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ 470 ๐ฎ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐!!! @PunishDo7 โ
@ScarecrowFTP ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ 10 ๐ซ๐ฝ ๐ท๐๐ ๐น$35.00 โ ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ฑ๐ ๐บ๐๐ ๐ซ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ 470 ๐ฎ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐!!! @PunishDo7 โ
CLIENTE SATISFEITO COM AS DIVULGAรรES โ VEM COM O MELHOR DIVULGADOR: @PunishDo7 โ
@JhonWhickOficial ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ 3 ๐ซ๐ฝ ๐ท๐๐ ๐น$12.00 โ ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ฑ๐ ๐บ๐๐ ๐ซ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ 470 ๐ฎ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐!!! @PunishDo7 โ
@ScarecrowFTP ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ 1 ๐ซ๐ฝ ๐ท๐๐ ๐น$04.00 โ ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ฑ๐ ๐บ๐๐ ๐ซ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ 470 ๐ฎ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐!!! @PunishDo7 โ
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @BePRefs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank โ 743,137 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@BePRefs named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleโs history โ see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today โ not that anything โdiedโ. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel โ we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐๐ฎ๐ง๐ข๐ฌ๐ก ๐ - ๐๐๐๐๐ซ๐๐ง๐๐ข๐๐ฌโ (@BePRefs), 14 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BePRefs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.