Channel
@Baznemaie
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry
181subscribers
+33 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003270124536 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Baznemaie |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Baznemaie |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:43 | 181 | +33 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:30 | 148 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:47 | 148 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (1 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 872 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 20:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
امر نو| مسئلهٔ وجود در بستر تاریخ ⬛️۷. گرویس عقیده دارد که آفرینش امر نو در مدرنیسم نمود آزادی انسان، چنانکه اغلب تصور میشود نیست. بلکه محصول اضطرار ویژه زمانی و استراتژی آگاهانه فرهنگ مدرنیته است. در ادامه چنین نگرشی گرویس حکم میدهد که نومایگی اساسا بر عدم دستیابی به ذات و پدیده ممکن شده است. نوآوری یعنی شناخت ارزشهای گذشته و نشان دادن واکنشی هوشمندانه به سنت فرهنگ. نوآوری امری مبتنی بر ظهور چیزی سابقاً پنهان ن…
بخشی دیگر از پژوهشهای ما در «بازنمایی» دربارهٔ مسئلهٔ «امر نو» ___ «امر نو» تنها در پیدا کردن چیزی متفاوت یا ساختن فرمی تازه خلاصه نمیشود؛ بلکه میتواند به تغییری بنیادین در شیوهٔ مواجههٔ ما با جهان و آنچه پیشتر شناختهایم اشاره داشته باشد. چیزی کهنه ممکن است در مواجههای تازه دوباره امکان نو شدن پیدا کند و چیزی ظاهراً نو، بدون تغییر در نگاه، همچنان در گذشته باقی بماند. در مجموعهٔ «۸ مسئلهٔ امر نو» تلاش کردیم ا…
روایتی تصویری از همراهی، تجربه و آموختن در کارگاه بازنمایی. پنجشنبهها | ساعت ۱۰ تا ۱۴ @Baznemaie
آکادمی بازنمایی pinned a file
آکادمی بازنمایی pinned a photo
با انتشار نخستین فایل PDF از مجموعهی سهگانهای که برای معرفی این هنرمند تهیه شده است، به بررسی و تحلیل زندگی، اندیشه و آثار او پرداختهایم. در ادامه نیز محتوای صفحه و کانال آکادمی بازنمایی پیرامون این هنرمند و جهان هنری او دنبال خواهد شد تا ابعاد مختلف آثار و تأثیراتش را عمیقتر واکاوی کنیم.
File, posted without a caption
امروز اولین PDF ما درباره پل نش منتشر میشود. امیدواریم این آغاز مجموعهای ارزشمند از محتوای آموزشی و تخصصی باشد.🌟
یکی از ویژگیهای آثار رودن، سطح ناتمام بسیاری از مجسمههای اوست. بخشهایی از سنگ، دستنخورده باقی میمانند و انگار پیکره هنوز در حال بیرون آمدن از دل ماده است. این انتخاب، یک نقص نیست؛ بلکه یادآور این حقیقت است که انسان نیز هرگز موجودی کامل و پایانیافته نیست. ما همیشه در حال شکل گرفتن، تغییر کردن و کاملتر شدن هستیم. امروز تقریباً هیچ مجسمهساز معاصری را نمیتوان یافت که به شکلی از رودن تأثیر نگرفته باشد. او نگاه هن…
پیش از رودن، مجسمهها اغلب بیحرکت و آرمانی بودند؛ بدنهایی بینقص که بیشتر به اسطورهها شباهت داشتند تا انسانهای واقعی. اما رودن به جای نمایش یک بدن کامل، به دنبال ثبت لحظهای زنده بود؛ لحظهای که عضلات منقبض میشوند، دستها حرف میزنند و سکوت چهره، داستانی طولانی را روایت میکند. او سنگ و برنز را چنان شکل میداد که گویی در حال نفس کشیدناند. رودن باور داشت که هنر نباید فقط زیبا باشد؛ باید صادق باشد. به همین دلیل، …
اگوست رودن" وقتی نام آگوست رودن را میشنویم، شاید اولین تصویری که به ذهنمان میرسد مجسمهی «متفکر» باشد. اما رودن فقط خالق چند اثر مشهور نبود؛ او کسی بود که مسیر مجسمهسازی مدرن را تغییر داد. پیش از او، بسیاری از مجسمهها در جستوجوی کمال ظاهری بودند، اما رودن نشان داد که آنچه هنر را ماندگار میکند، نمایش حقیقت انسان است؛ با تمام نقصها، احساسات و تردیدهایش. @Baznemaie
امر نو| مسئلهٔ وجود در بستر تاریخ 🟪۵.ایدهٔ خاص پسامدرن اعلام میدارد که مدرنیسم دستکم به عنوان سنت پیروز شدهاست اما بقدری این پیروزی گران بود که فرقی با شکست ندارد. «چگونه میتوانیم از سنتی (مدرنیسم) بگسلیم که از بحران، ارزش میسازد؟». 🟪۶. مدرنیسم به دنبال بریدگی از تاریخ و اختراع زبانی به تمامی گسسته از گذشته بود؛ دستیابی به حقیقتی کاملاً مطلق (آبستره). اما نظریهٔ عمومیتیافته پسامدرنیسم اعلام میدارد که مدرنیس…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Baznemaie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 417,280 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
One URL this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association— we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آکادمی بازنمایی” (@Baznemaie), 181 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Baznemaie.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.