Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Байо

@Bayo_cos

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

340subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002120730230
TypeChannel
Username@Bayo_cos
DescriptionПрайс Лист: https://t.me/Bayo_cos/4475
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Bayo_cos

Growth

3408 Aug 2026, 01:33 — 340 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 07:02 — 340 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 01:338 Aug 2026, 07:02
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 339–341 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 07:02340no change
8 Aug 2026, 01:33340first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
53.4%
avg views ÷ 340 subscribers
Avg views / post
182
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
14.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held12 (30 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total2,180
Reactions total313
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,850
Videos
325
Links
249

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
29s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

313 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9831.3%
custom 51931353752451335248727.8%
custom 52129516413843039314213.4%
custom 5213160325255280319288.95%
❤‍🔥227.03%
🌭144.47%
🔥134.15%
😍61.92%
🙈30.958%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 313reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 04:56 UTC99 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Ох ты 2B любимка 😈

custom 519313537524513352411🔥7

5 Aug 2026, 02:45 UTC144 views42 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 ⭐🤩🌹 🐈🐈🐈 Rt/Reaction 🐈 Подписаться на автора 🤩

custom 52131603252552803191913custom 519313537524513352410

4 Aug 2026, 16:14 UTC150 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Норм фоток не будет

custom 5193135375245133524178custom 52131603252552803197custom 52129516413843039313🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 14:55 UTC147 views40 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

😈😈😈

custom 51931353752451335242012custom 52129516413843039318

4 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC140 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Кстати фильм все таки держит больше не в состоянии восторга, а тревоги и гнета. Чего музыка стоит, никаких вам тут эпиков и быстрых тем, только тревога, отчаяние, страх 😒🌚

🙈3

4 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTC152 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

The Odyssey (Одиссея) Режиссер и автор сценария: Кристофер Нолан Жанр: эпический приключенческий фильм, фэнтези, исторический экшен. В основе фильма лежит миф об Одиссее царе Итаки. Так ли плох фильм? Пойду против всех недовольных и скажу, что фильм вышел на редкость отличным, не смотря на наличие бравой повестки о которой трубят и воняют на тысячи просмотров. Основные претензии к фильму, что Нолан сделал все по св

6

4 Aug 2026, 02:43 UTC148 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Хочу сегодня что-то на таких вайбах поснимать

🌭147custom 51931353752451335243

1 Aug 2026, 10:55 UTC207 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Новый перс табакошки? Ваще шутко, просто приколдэсные ушы с ненавистного вб на одного персонажа из того же аниме (ггшка тоже будет)🍉

18❤‍🔥8😍6

31 Jul 2026, 07:31 UTC293 views54 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 🔞🔞🔞 Rt/reaction Подписаться на автора

custom 51931353752451335242217custom 521295164138430393113custom 52131603252552803192

30 Jul 2026, 15:41 UTC246 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌟🌟✨🌟🌟

custom 521295164138430393114

30 Jul 2026, 15:30 UTC226 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

10custom 51931353752451335244custom 52129516413843039314

30 Jul 2026, 07:49 UTC228 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Чуть чуть планов на первую неделю августа (а на сегодня - сигны в Эвелинн и фото с видео) 🙂🙂🙂

❤‍🔥147🔥5

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @Bayo_cos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 180,741 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Байо” (@Bayo_cos), 340 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bayo_cos.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.