Бэтмэн pinned a photo

Channel
Бэтмэн
@Batmencos
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
54subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001859834306 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Batmencos |
| Description | Личкa: @CosBatm :3 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Batmencos |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:01 | 54 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:59 | 54 | first reading |
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 83.7%
- avg views ÷ 54 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 45.2
- 10 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 15.3%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 13
- of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (28 July 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 452 |
| Reactions total | 69 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 521
- Videos
- 136
- Links
- 36
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 33s
- Average length
- 11s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
69 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5334734305191036767 | 15 | 21.7% | |
| custom 5447190619313181071 | 12 | 17.4% | |
| custom 5309760771171834789 | 10 | 14.5% | |
| custom 5233567011958697078 | 9 | 13.0% | |
| custom 5375302865461981877 | 8 | 11.6% | |
| custom 5307914523645064825 | 7 | 10.1% | |
| custom 5269649173946345008 | 6 | 8.70% | |
| custom 5384257391237829529 | 2 | 2.90% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Хотите пост отдельно Чулки?
custom 53097607711718347891
🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂 🫧🫧🫧🫧 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🔤achira🌟🌟 🌟🌟🔤higiri 😘Oke oke oke oke oke ❤️La la la la la la la la la
custom 53347343051910367673custom 52335670119586970782custom 53842573912378295292
Мы тут с корицей коллаб замутили...
custom 53347343051910367674custom 53079145236450648252custom 53753028654619818772
🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵 🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵 Вот уже как 12 минут у Монти день рождения🌟 14 уже моей подруне! ❤️
custom 54471906193131810716custom 53097607711718347892custom 53347343051910367672
Ребятки, в канале пошли отписки, что бы вы хотели здесь видеть? Какие вам косплеи поснимать?
custom 53347343051910367674
Знакомьтесь, это Аркадий. На нем подсказочка на ближайший закос🤩
custom 53753028654619818776custom 53079145236450648253custom 53097607711718347893
Бэтмэн pinned a video
🇪🇸🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹 🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🔹🇵🇹 𝐒pain 𝐏ortugaly Тг хрумкает качество, сорянчик
custom 52696491739463450086custom 52335670119586970782custom 54471906193131810712
Пока так, позже переделаю пост
custom 52335670119586970785custom 53097607711718347894custom 54471906193131810714
А давайте анон?
custom 53347343051910367672
Кто съел качество? Признавайтесь
custom 53079145236450648252
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @Batmencos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Бэтмэн” (@Batmencos), 54 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Batmencos.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.