Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

کانال بشیر سراجی

@BashirSeraji

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

133subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001063198617
TypeChannel
Username@BashirSeraji
CreatedBetween 1 May 2016 and 31 January 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/BashirSeraji

Growth

133134133.57 August 2026 — 134 subscribers9 August 2026 — 134 subscribers15 August 2026 — 133 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 133–134 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 19:28133-1
9 Aug 2026, 00:01134no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:13134first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
89.5%
avg views ÷ 133 subscribers
Avg views / post
119
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (21 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total2,382
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 00:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
20m 30s
Average length
2m 34s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 12:37 UTC46 viewsread 9 August 2026

تیر خلاص رو کسی میزنه که دنبال کشته سازی برای کاسبیه بعدیه تیر خلاص رو کسی می زنه که بارها مثل منافقین خلق چنین کاری کرده تیر خلاص رو کسی میزنه که شکست رو حس کرده و مجبور از نزدیک و به نامردی یاران خودش که فرار میکنند بزنه البته اسلحه دارها و لیدرها مست و مواد کشیده بودن، ولی خب ماموریت رو درست انجام دادن

3 Aug 2026, 04:00 UTC57 viewsread 9 August 2026

ای حامیان هشتک نه به اعدام و قصاص، ای کاش دی ماه هشتک میزدید : نه به کشتن ماموران نه به غارت فروشگاه ها نه به کشتن بسیجی نه به کشتن و سوزاندن پلیس نه به سوزاندن آدم ها نه به سوزاندن بانک ها نه به سوزاندن سطل اشغال ها نه به سوزاندن فروشگاه ها نه به تخریب عابربانک ها نه به سوزاندن مساجد نه به سوزاندن قرآن ها نه به سوزاندن زیارتگاه ها و امامزاده ها نه به شکستن شیشه متروها و بی آرتی ها نه به سوزاندن آمبولان

28 Jul 2026, 17:14 UTC121 viewsread 9 August 2026
Video

باز سازی صحنه قتل ماموران حافظ امنیت اصفهان توسط قاتلان بخش های آخر همان قاتلی است که میگویند دستش معلول بوده، چطور می توانسته آدم بکشد؟

28 Jul 2026, 12:23 UTC69 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @Zandiq_IQ7Video

✅ هنوز بسیاری از مردم نمیدانند که اگر شاه عباس صفوی نبود، شاید امروز نامی از خلیج فارس و تنگه هرمز وجود نداشت... 🎬 این ادیت بسیار زیبا را مشاهده و سپس انتشار دهید... ========================= 🔍 کانال دروغ ها و خرافات ملحدین 🌐 @Zandiq_IQ7

28 Jul 2026, 02:32 UTC113 viewsread 9 August 2026
Video

چهار مامور امنیت رو در ۱۸ دی ماه در اصفهان شهید کردند. زنده زنده سوزوندن. ۱۹ دی با بعضی شون برخورد شد. بعد از شش هفت ماه ، دو یا سه نفر قاتل اصلی قصاص شدند. خیلی آدم آگاه به قتل ، باید حرومی باشه بگه چرا قصاص شدن. مگه میشه آدم کش رها بگرده؟!! مظلوم نمایی حربه خوبی نیست. کودتاچی ها دنبال سواستفاده از این قصاص به نفع خودشون هستند، ولی جنایتکار باید مجازات بشه و این رو اکثریت مردم خوب متوجه هستند. قاتلان اصلی این

26 Jul 2026, 08:05 UTC56 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @saeedism_irPhoto

ما این شکلی بودیم تا اینکه سر و کله اینترنشنال پیدا شد... ــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ ✅ #اخبار_لحظه‌ای_جنگ✌️👇 @saeedism_ir

26 Jul 2026, 00:32 UTC67 viewsread 9 August 2026
Video

روحت شاد ای استکبار ستیز ضد امپریالیزم و ای تبیین گر ماهیت آمریکای جنایتکار فارغ از اینکه اشتباهاتی در تلفظ واژگان وجود دارد، روح برخاسته از گفتار بسیار ارزنده ست. ای کاش همه اساتید دانشگاه و نخبگان، ذره ای قلم و کلام خود را به سمت آمریکا و تمدن وحشی غرب میگرفتند

24 Jul 2026, 23:29 UTC75 viewsread 9 August 2026

تناقض یعنی اینکه شعارت جدایی سیاست از همه چیز باشد، اما در ارزیابی هنر و بازیگری بی نظیر اکبر عبدی با عنوان حکومتی بودن، نادیده اش بگیری.

24 Jul 2026, 15:01 UTC71 viewsread 9 August 2026

جنگ داخلی بشه و اکثریت مردم با جمهوری اسلامی باشن و طرفداران رضا پهلوی همراه ترامپ و نتانیاهو، شما کدوم طرف میجنگی؟

24 Jul 2026, 14:50 UTC71 viewsread 9 August 2026

آقای معین مشکات در کانالش واگذاری بحرین را انکار کرده بود. خانم هاشمی پاسخ داده است

24 Jul 2026, 14:42 UTC69 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @fanusname

اعتراض خانم مریم هاشمی مقدم بر یادداشت بالا: درود ⭕️چند اشکال عمده در تلاش شما برای تطهیر خاندان پهلوی وجود دارد. متأسفانه شما نمی‌توانید فقط به بریده یک روزنامه اکتفا کنید؛ اگرچه همان بریده روزنامه نیز دقیقاً مؤید استقلال بحرین در زمان پهلوی دوم است. سخنان هویدا، که در آن اقرار می‌کند بحرین «بار اضافی» بوده و مانند دختری بوده که شوهر داده شده، خود اعتراف صریحی‌ست که بحرین تا آن زمان جزئی از خانه پدری محسوب می‌شده؛

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BashirSeraji. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 978,063 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“کانال بشیر سراجی” (@BashirSeraji), 133 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BashirSeraji.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.