Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Based Confessions

Channel

Based Confessions

@BasedConfessions

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

27subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002039563204
TypeChannel
Username@BasedConfessions
DescriptionBrought to you by @BasedDevsHub Discussion Group: @BasedConfessionsChat Bot: @BasedConfessionsBot
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 28 January 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/BasedConfessions

Growth

277 August 2026 — 27 subscribers11 August 2026 — 27 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26–28 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 07:1627no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:5727first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 January 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 August 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

31 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1445.2%
🤣722.6%
😢619.4%
💯26.45%
🔥13.23%
😁13.23%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 January 2024 to 22 August 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2024, 23:53 UTC608 viewsread 11 August 2026

Sold 20 eth @3500 and thought to stay out of the slow market. Fortunately market crashed 😂😂😂😂 and I bought almost 30 eth fortunate enough to buy at bottom. I am in all again

17 Jun 2024, 05:43 UTC590 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

F**k zksync airdrop. I had spent quite some amount farming and most importantly my time. The shittiest airdrop I received from zksync is 0, yes a big zero

😢2

12 May 2024, 08:04 UTC647 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

This bullrun will be my last, it's too much addictive. Going to have my normal life back after this

4

23 Apr 2024, 16:09 UTC642 viewsread 11 August 2026

I wish had sold the FTX tokens before the collapse, would have easily made my portfolio cross 100k, sadly

18 Apr 2024, 06:06 UTC608 viewsread 11 August 2026

I got liquidated with the btc dump and my last $1k remaining. Opened a long @50x leverage. Hoping btc to pump to get what I have lost.

30 Mar 2024, 14:29 UTC526 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

In last bullrun, I had 6 digit bag, saw it crumbling to 4 digit and was there for all these time with low 5 digits. Now that the airdrop popped up again, I connected wallet to a skem altlayer website and one wallet got drained. I am now left with around half of $

😢4

26 Mar 2024, 09:11 UTC440 viewsread 11 August 2026

Oh shoot, I am not ready for this bullrun and market pumped already. Will never be ready seems. Trying to get as much as possible to make it this time.à

9 Mar 2024, 15:44 UTC388 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026

I recently launched an util based project on eth which died in a moment, snipers fked it. Then I decided a war against snipers, thought to deploy contracts and blastlist those snipers. Guess what? lost again and again, fked up everytime. I hate snipers.

🤣7

7 Mar 2024, 05:34 UTC352 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

My 100% portfolio is in meme. Can't imagine crypto without memes. If you are a meme maxi, show me 100 love emotes and I share my portfolio next

4

3 Mar 2024, 01:48 UTC425 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Never stop grinding, the more you are active, the more you earn. The most important part is building your circle, I have been grinding from past couple of years and when I look back, I feel I have made substantial gain. It's all about grinding and mindset, don't lose hope.

6

2 Mar 2024, 14:56 UTC294 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Crypto is in the world of scams. Everyone is scamming like everyone else. People are losing their integrity just for money. They do not think about the Hereafter. when They will be real man in this World 😇

💯2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BasedConfessions. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,072,450 of 1,628,927entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Based Confessions” (@BasedConfessions), 27 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BasedConfessions.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.