![Telegram profile photo for B A R S [Explosive] 💥](https://cdn.tgregister.com/av/4e/4eab46c656e6377608c6a5288d60849c9846302db2edacf35bad057a2e7a97ee.jpg)
Channel
@Barsixx1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
443subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002139372718 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Barsixx1 |
| Created | 9 January 2024 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Barsixx1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:33 | 443 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 448 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:47 | 448 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (15 July 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,691 |
| Reactions total | 381 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 05:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
444 reactions across 14 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5785126196714938984 | 86 | 19.4% | |
| custom 5789625445540438052 | 78 | 17.6% | |
| custom 5789569512181339674 | 63 | 14.2% | |
| custom 5269724962939248658 | 51 | 11.5% | |
| 💘 | 42 | 9.46% | |
| custom 5787467516531972844 | 26 | 5.86% | |
| custom 5940638110575499307 | 24 | 5.41% | |
| 🔥 | 23 | 5.18% | |
| 😇 | 18 | 4.05% | |
| custom 5472052071865805920 | 7 | 1.58% | |
| ⚡ | 7 | 1.58% | |
| 🍓 | 6 | 1.35% | |
| 😈 | 4 | 0.901% | |
| 🐳 | 3 | 0.676% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 0.676% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 0.45% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.225% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 444reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Barsixx1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
😱 танец покоё танец сиксевен или танец мелстроя, тебе что большле нравится [ #ГероиЭнвелла #ИльяМуромов ]
custom 578512619671493898419custom 57896254455404380527custom 59406381105754993077💘2🔥2😍2🍓1
как вам пост?
💘16😇5
🌟 🤩 🍋 ⭐🤩🤩 🤩 🤩🌊 – quando la vita ti dà i limoni, prepara la limonata [ #скетч #ос ]
custom 578956951218133967423custom 578512619671493898416custom 52697249629392486589💘3🐳2
😎🏮 Мыло в доме Фильюшек? Невозможно, фотошоп Я их так люблю, сегодня целый день рисую с ними мемы, почти не устала. Сижу в кафе, скетчу 😘🌺 [ #Филья #ГероиЭнвелла ]
custom 526972496293924865825custom 57895695121813396748custom 57874675165319728446💘3🥰3🐳1🕊1custom 57851261967149389841
картинка с запахом [ #филья #ГероиЭнвелла ]
custom 578962544554043805223custom 57851261967149389848custom 52697249629392486585custom 59406381105754993074💘1
😳 Ладно, то что телеграм меня не буллит и не сжимает мои картинки.... Это я конечно погорячилась XD
custom 594063811057549930712custom 57851261967149389845custom 57896254455404380525🔥1😇1
🍊arcel Sunrise 🍊🍊🍊 edition - 🐡 - Я люблю коллажики делать в последнее время пипец сильно. Особенно простенькие скетчи оформлять, ваще вайб. Это я рисовала в САИ на компе своего парня, мне если честно очень зашло, поэтому ВОЗМОЖНО я украду у него компьютер. На какое-то время. Мне нравится, что качество картинки не съедается и что вес не такой большой, поэтому телеграм меня не буллит из-за формата 4к на 4к. Как вам ф…
custom 578746751653197284418custom 57896254455404380529custom 54720520718658059206💘2custom 57895695121813396742custom 52697249629392486581
какие мульты вы смотрели?? Может, посоветуете что-нибудь годное?? Напишите, даже если я смотрела, буду понимать за какие мультики вы шарите, мб нарисую ☺️
custom 57896254455404380524custom 57851261967149389843🔥1
Вы не знали, но я очень люблю ОСД. И Стэдди. Мои любимые пейринги это всегда: "ох, два моих любимых персонажа взаимодействуют? Чтож, пожалуй им суждено быть вместе."
custom 57896254455404380529😇5custom 57874675165319728442
🤩🤩🤩🤩 & 🤩🤩🤩🤩 [#strangerthings #скетч]
custom 578512619671493898414😇7custom 57896254455404380524custom 54720520718658059201
🐬🤍🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🐋🫧 ✨🐚🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🪬⚓️🤍 Редрав некоторой недавней картиночки с моим вонючим рыболовом, захотелось посмотреть на него 19 летнего в своём стиле. С ним вы хотя бы немного знакомы, думаю ава этого канала вам должна кого-то напоминать. [ #ос ]
custom 578956951218133967415⚡6💘6custom 57896254455404380523custom 52697249629392486581custom 57851261967149389841custom 59406381105754993071
🫧🪼 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🐟🤍 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🐟🐠🪼 🤩🤩убертатная язва из Янтаря. 😐 #ос #скетч
🔥19custom 57896254455404380527💘4custom 57851261967149389843
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @Barsixx1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,012,877 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“B A R S [Explosive] 💥” (@Barsixx1), 443 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Barsixx1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.