Channel
@BandoriMERCH
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
79subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004383648116 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BandoriMERCH |
| Description | П𑄝 всᧉм в𑄝пр𑄝сᨡм пꭎсᨡmь @Nyamureal |
| Created | 12 July 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BandoriMERCH |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:45 | 79 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:32 | 79 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (12 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 237 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 06:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Приветик снова! В ближайшее время я буду немного щитпостить про товары, а так же буду узнавать ваши предпочтения. Сейчас на меркари я заметила, что начал появляться мерч по Юмемита. Как много у нас котят, которые интересуются мерчом с ним? Расскажите кого бы вы хотели! Но все же пока-что у нас в приоритете Ave Mujica ибо по ним больше можно сделать разбивок🤍
Тогда принято решение продолжать разбивы! Не буду повторять про ваше внимание к себе, думаю все и так поняли. Пока я нахожусь в ресте, то постараюсь усовершенствовать разбивы и + находить более интересные вещи для вас! Спасибо что остаётесь рядом!🍥
Стоит ли продолжать разбивы?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Всем приветик! Прошу прощения за то, что оставила канал пылится, в моей жизни начались некоторые трудности, которые продолжаются досихпор.. После всех решений проблем, я думаю над тем, чтобы заняться снова разбивами. Единственное что я хотела бы у вас попросить чтобы не терять мотивацию: действительно разбирать большую часть разбивов, которые я сюда кидаю. Для вас это мерч, а для меня поддержка. Снова же извиняюсь за…
^^
! разбив набора брелоков ! 352 за штуку Пишите позицию в комментариях, после разбива вы будете приглашены в группу для оплаты. Реакция = вы отмечены Набор сейчас в Японии, скоро поедут ко мне а дальше рассылка к вам (ожидание: 3-4 месяца, чуть позже платите за доставку к вам либо ждете другой мерч от меня, который взяли. Отправляю через почту России) Берем на Mercari через магазинчик Волчицы @BandoriMERCH
По секрету скажу что там 5 плюшек, стендик с мутсуми, и я даже отрыла значки по юмемита... Готовимся!.. Пиши в комментариях кого ждешь из двух групп больше всего! @BandoriMERCH
Всем привет котята, у меня сейчас очень ограничивают интернет, поэтому давайте мы проведем разбивы с учётом того, что вы все скушаете? 🤍 Нас ожидают 10 разбивов с Ave Mujica и MyGO!!!!! Запаситесь денюжками ибо я скоро начну!! @BandoriMERCH
! разбив карточек Ave Mujica с рук ! • горизонтальные — 70 рублей за штуку • вертикальные — 50 рублей за штуку Пишите номер позиции в комментариях, после разбива вы будете приглашены в группу для оплаты. Реакция = вы отмечены Карты в России, скоро приедут ко мне а дальше рассылка к вам (ожидание: 1-2 месяца, чуть позже платите за доставку к вам либо ждете другой мерч от меня, который взяли. Отправляю через почту Росс…
Что скажите про фигурки по MyGO!!!!! И Ave Mujica? Видела кучу фигурок по муго и парочку с аве муджика..
🎀𑄝mяmᨡ я бᧉзумн𑄝 счᨡсmлꭎвᨡ! Вᨡс ужᧉ 65! С кᧉм бы х𑄝mᧉлꭎ рᨡзбꭎвы? К𑄝г𑄝 ꭎ чт𑄝 плᨡнꭎруᧉmᧉ с𑄝бꭎрᨡmь? (Пᧉрс𑄝нᨡж с бд.оир нотес ; брелки, значки, стенды, карточки, плюшки!) Буду сmᨡрᨡmься нᨡйmꭎ вᨡшꭎ зᨡпр𑄝сы! @BandoriMERCH
🎀𑄝см𑄝mрꭎmᧉ кᨡкую крᨡс𑄝mу я нᨡшлᨡ! Х𑄝чу сдᧉлᨡmь рᨡзбꭎв нᨡ эmꭎх мꭎлах! 🎀ы бы взялꭎ? 🤩. ( 🎀 сл𑄝ву 𑄝дꭎн пузᧉнышь 750 рублꭎк𑄝в! ) 🎀𑄝 нᧉ зᨡбывᨡйmᧉ, чm𑄝 рᨡзбꭎвы будуm п𑄝слᧉ 65 п𑄝дпꭎсчꭎк𑄝в!🎀 @BandoriMERCH
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @BandoriMERCH. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Стоит ли продолжать разбивы?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 683,774 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“!! Разбив мерча BANDORI our notes” (@BandoriMERCH), 79 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BandoriMERCH.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.