Update call, X11 from the last call!

Channel
BadBunny Calls
@Badbunnycalls2
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
27subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001937615861 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Badbunnycalls2 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 20 August 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Badbunnycalls2 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:01 | 27 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:12 | 27 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 20 August 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 March 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 59
- Links
- 102
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
7 reactions across 2 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 28.6% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 28.6% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 14.3% | |
| 🖕 | 1 | 14.3% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 14.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 August 2023 to 2 March 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
X 7 from the initial call, the only group call SolSponge at the Bottom! https://dexscreener.com/solana/4dalurdfiqyxkjwsjy2gcboip5shzpwvqn4r31bc2zjw
SOL Ape SolSponge at 94k marketcap, dextool and dexscreen fully updated, https://www.dextools.io/app/en/solana/pair-explorer/4DaLuRdFiqyxkjWsjY2gcBoiP5shzpwvQn4r31bC2ZJw?t=1709144070061 Socials updated on Dextools and Dexcreener, Coingecko, CMC fastrack submitted. 39acNhhTivK94u7JKcFBtzv9nboZTeL6DzBYkATqqMGQ
Wojak On ETH Buy! 💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵 💵 0.50 ETH ($793.39) 🪙 13,485,759 WOJAK 🔹 0xa0e5…b939 | Txn 🔼 Position +1000% 🔼 Market Cap $61,706 🥇 Chart ✨ Trade 🔫 Snipe 🔹 Trending 🔹 Trending 🥇 ETH TRENDING
$WOJAK Gamble play rn 👀 Find your entry, WOJAK https://t.me/WojakOnEth https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0xb0f0a5091c4494b56db0a43ee9acba3257d3806c
$KINGDOM is now at 1M7 MC and still pumping hard 🚀 14X from call - 28X from DIP 🤑 I will update its further TG: https://t.me/Kingdom_erc20 https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x7ac46647b0b6850f445aaded0b2694c927cb0539
❤2
Ape $OPIUM at this entry Telegram : https://t.me/OpiumERC Chart : https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0x1885de8f5773e09cd01c2246508897a40de06160 MarketCap : 145k
$FTX [ ERC20] Good community, good Ticker, good chart so far, In a dip now, decent play. I ape some at this entry. ◾️Tax - 0 ◾️Mcap - 1.5m DEX - https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0x3b6ea8d9c6dfaba0ffc63086b9eb669ddeb96ee2 TG - https://t.me/HairyPlotterFTXPortal WEB - https://www.hairyplotterftx.com/
$PEPEREUM Gamble play rn!! Check for volume and entry!! DYOR ✌️TAX 0/0 0x3CF414F5009C236439B25c01BdD59193305E2FdC TG: https://t.me/pepereumportal Website: https://pepereumcoin.vip/
Photo, posted without a caption
$KINGDOM ATH at 700k MC 👀 Already 7X from call - 14X from Dip
$KINGDOM Community is hyped!! Good utility and gameplay 👀 TG: https://t.me/Kingdom_erc20 https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x7ac46647b0b6850f445aaded0b2694c927cb0539
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Badbunnycalls2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Kingdom_erc20 · 4702 postsElysion Portal
@ElysionERC · 691 post@ETHTRENDING (LIVE)
@ETHTRENDING · 45,3491 postETHER | HarryPotterObamaMilady888Inu
@HPOM888I · 221 postMADAPE OFFICIAL
@madapeeth · 1211 postOpium Bird $OPIUM
@OpiumERC · 1851 postSHIBA INU CLASSIC
@SHIBINUC · 2281 postSpidercat portal
@Spidercaterc · 1061 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Badbunnycalls2 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BadBunny Calls” (@Badbunnycalls2), 27 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Badbunnycalls2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.