Channel
@BadComment
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
19,072subscribers
-44 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001411895938 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BadComment |
| Description | 🔻 پستا فقط برای خندیدن شماست (جدی نگیرید) |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BadComment |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:34 | 19,072 | -8 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:21 | 19,080 | -10 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:12 | 19,090 | -5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:11 | 19,095 | -8 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 19,103 | -10 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:44 | 19,113 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:33 | 19,116 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 31 July 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,773 reactions across 17 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 660 | 37.2% | |
| 😁 | 624 | 35.2% | |
| ❤ | 83 | 4.68% | |
| 🤔 | 60 | 3.38% | |
| 👌 | 52 | 2.93% | |
| 😢 | 49 | 2.76% | |
| 🤯 | 31 | 1.75% | |
| 🍾 | 30 | 1.69% | |
| 😱 | 30 | 1.69% | |
| 👏 | 27 | 1.52% | |
| 👀 | 24 | 1.35% | |
| 💔 | 24 | 1.35% | |
| 😴 | 16 | 0.902% | |
| ❤🔥 | 14 | 0.79% | |
| 😭 | 11 | 0.62% | |
| 🍓 | 6 | 0.338% | |
| 🎉 | 5 | 0.282% | |
| 🤩 | 5 | 0.282% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 0.226% | |
| 💋 | 4 | 0.226% | |
| 5 further kinds | 14 | 0.79% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,773reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2023 to 7 August 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
آقای سفیر ما تو تقویم رسمی کشورمون برای تک تک روزایی که به ملتمون سخت گذشت و عزیز از دست دادیم روز بزرگداشت داریم اما شما برای اون ۲۲۰٬۰۰۰ نفری که تو هیروشیما و ناکازاکی پودر شدن ناچاری خودتو به فراموشی بزنی. بله، ما مثل هم نیستیم! 💬 علی فرحـــزادی @Fars_plus
👍243🤔26❤10😁9🍾6⚡3❤🔥3👀3
دست جدید رشد کرد انگار @Squad_Iran | #kamelat
😁388🤔30👀16👍12❤10💔9😢6🍓4
آقای صدا و سیما؛ بگذارید سال عجمیان و آرمان تمام شود و بعد این قالتاق را به تلویزیون برگردانید. باتشکر.. زیاده عرضی نیست. @makshufat
👍141❤14😁13❤🔥9🤩5🍾4🤔4🤯4
💢یکی از فواحش بهائی در دانمارک به قرآن توهین کرد عبدالحمید تو که هشت ماه مشغول حمایت از فرقه ضاله و نجس بهاییون بودید در جنایتی که توسط اعضای این فرقه علیه قران کریم افتاده است بی شک شریک هستید ✍️بیداری ملت @bidari_com
😢38👏26👍17😁8❤6🔥2😍2😴2
✨يأتي الصباح بنسمات من عبق الأمل والفرح فلنستنشقها بعمق ونبدأ يومنا بابتسامة وتفاؤل صباح الخير ♥️ https://t.me/IraninArabic
❤9👍7🍾1
🔸 دایانا فاینشتین سناتور دمکرات از کالیفرنیا، نود سال دارد و متوجه نمیشود بحث درباره چیست، نیروی حفاظت میآید تذکر میدهد که فقط «بله» بگوید. به لایحهای که میلیاردها دلار به ماشین جنگی آمریکا تزریق خواهد کرد. 🔹 این نتیجه دمکراسی است، کاملا آزاد و سکولار. اجازه ندهید هیچ کس غلط زیادی کند که اگر نظامِ ایران مثل آمریکا و اروپا بود پیرسالاری یا فساد و زد و بند و آقازادگی نداشت. با آزادی بیشتر ممکن است بدتر هم بشود. @…
👍16❤2🏆2
🔸 اصلاحطلب است و عاشق خاتمی، دلداده جهرمی و ظریف، آرزوی مرگ رهبری را دارد. 🔹 نوشته یدالله جانسوز درباره پشتپرده اینها را ببینید 👈 نظام بیافتد ولی ما بمانیم. @makshufat
👍28😁5❤3🍾2🍓1
📝 شکست خادم الشریعه از عامل بالشریعه 🔸 سارا خادمالشریعه که اول حجاب را کنار گذاشت بعد تابعیت ایرانی را دور انداخت و اسپانیایی شد از مدینه اولیا دختر اهل اندونزی که به تازگی حجاب را انتخاب کرده شکست خورد. 🔹 احمقها حجاب را به طور کلی عامل محدودیت و شکست جا میزنند اما اصلا ربطی ندارد و در بسیاری از فعالیتها محدودیتش از لباس مردان (به خصوص کت و شلوار و کراوات) کمتر است. 🔸 حجاب دستور خدا است و نتیجهاش اخلاقی و اخ…
😁42👍29😭11❤6💔5😴4🍾3👀1
📝 قلدری چه پیامی میدهد؟ #دانشطلب 🔸 دو سه شب پیش بحثی داشتیم درباره تنشآفرینی در مقوله حجاب که معمولا نظام به آن متهم میشود نه طرف مقابل. همه میدانیم خیلی از شرکتها در محیطِ خودشان آزادند و نظام هم این را میداند. همین که میداند و کاری ندارد یعنی کوتاه آمده و مسامحه میکند اما جواب این عقبنشینی را چطور گرفته؟ یک نمونهاش را همین چند روزه شاهد بودیم. 🔹 دیجیکالا و طاقچه و ازکی پشت سر هم عکس کشف حجاب از کارم…
👍23😴4❤3🍾1
همکاری برند غنچه با سرآشپز نواب ابراهیمی توهین کننده به حاج قاسم و رپرتاژ آگهی آخرین خبر @makshufat
😁43🤯26👍18🍾4❤3🎉3👀3💔2
با گروهک تروریستی موسوم به ارتش مردمی بیشتر آشنا شوید 🔹گروهک تروریستی موسوم به «ارتش مردمی» به سرکردگی «شاهین لو» (شاهین زحمتکش) خواننده و رپر گروهک TMBAX ساکن هلند بوده که در فضای مجازی و شبکههای اجتماعی نسبت به سازماندهی عناصر و هستههای تروریستی در داخل کشور طراحی شد. سیامک تدین طهماسبی نیز که همچون شاهینلو در هلند ساکن است، از رابطان اصلی این گروهک و از طراحان اصلی اقدامات تروریستی است. 🔹اقدامات خرابکارانه ای…
👍21🍾3❤2
🔸 جدی جدی فکر می کنید اسنپ و طاقچه و بایا و ازکی و اُ کالا و بقیه رانتکده های استارت آپی رو یسری جوون نخبه و مستقل و دغدغه مند کسب و کار و «وطن دوباره میسازمت» ساخته اند و پشتش هستند؟ اکبر شهبازی 🔹 استارتاپ ها آنقدر پشتشان گرم است که حتی در دهه ۱۳۹۰ تصویب شد میتوانند سرباز امریه جذب کنند؛ با توجه به ماهیت خصوصی بسیاری از شرکتهای دانش بنیان این یک کار بیسابقه بود. اینکه این شرکتها حاصل کار تعدادی جوان نخبه، مستقل!…
👍21😁4🤯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @BadComment. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,015,423 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bad Comment” (@BadComment), 19,072 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BadComment.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.