Channel
@BWAVE_NEWS
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
279subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001943472061 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BWAVE_NEWS |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BWAVE_NEWS |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 02:08 | 279 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 280 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:32 | 281 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 281 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (15 July 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 223 |
| Reactions total | 26 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
50 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 36 | 72.0% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 12.0% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 8.00% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 4.00% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 4.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🧠 The 2026 International Olympiad in Artificial Intelligence starts today. As a token of support for those who will reinvent our civilization, we'll issue 🏆 240 exclusive Intelligence Cups to the winners. 💵 We guarantee minimum buyback prices ($1,000 per Gold Cup, etc.), but the cups' limited supply may make them worth much more on the secondary market. Good luck, AI coders! 🍀
🔥3
Protocol Update Day 3 of Large-Scale Network Validation. Happy New Month to our incredible Bluewave community. 🌊 First, we'd like to thank every one of you for your patience, understanding, and continued support throughout this validation phase. We never anticipated the process would take this long, but the insights we've gained have been invaluable. Over the past 24 hours, we've seen significant progress. Core…
❤3
Protocol Update Day 2 of Large-Scale Network Validation. Recovery efforts are continuing as our engineering team works through the infrastructure changes identified during validation. System recovery is currently 48% complete. During this process, the Bluewave Mini App will remain temporarily unavailable while we restore, validate, and strengthen the underlying infrastructure. This process is taking longer than …
❤2
Before validation started, we successfully completed a full protocol snapshot of the network. This means: • Your mined balance is safe. • Your streaks are safe. • Your mission progress is safe. • Your account data is safe. Once validation is complete and the network is restored, every account will resume exactly from the recorded snapshot. No progress will be lost. Building infrastructure capable of supporting m…
⚡2
Protocol Update Day 1 of Large-Scale Network Validation. Earlier today, we exposed the Human Presence Protocol to significantly larger behavioural datasets and interaction volumes than it has ever processed before. As expected with validation at this scale, the protocol uncovered several infrastructure bottlenecks and generated extensive diagnostic logs that our engineering team is actively analysing. The Bluewav…
⚡1❤1
Should temporary downtime occur during testing: • No mined $BWAVE will be lost. • No streaks will be lost. • No mission progress will be lost. • No account data will be be lost. Once validation is complete, every account will resume from today's snapshot exactly as it was. Building infrastructure for millions of verified humans means testing it under millions of interactions, not simulations. Tomorrow, we put the…
❤3
Protocol Update The protocol snapshot has now been completed successfully. Every account, mining balance, streak, mission history, and protocol state has been securely captured ahead of tomorrow's Large-Scale Network Validation. From this point forward, the snapshot becomes the network's recovery checkpoint throughout the validation process. Tomorrow, we'll expose the Presence Verification Protocol to significant…
❤1
Pavel Durov, co-founder of Telegram, has been placed on the international wanted list by Russia's Federal Security Service (FSB). He faces charges under Part 1.1 of Article 205.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, specifically for alleged assistance to terrorist activities. An agency reports that Ukrainian intelligence services allegedly deployed a Telegram bot, "Divingchik/Leo," to recruit Russian citi…
❤1🔥1
This is the same class of testing required before any large-scale protocol can confidently expand. Many performance constraints only emerge under production-level traffic and cannot be accurately simulated in smaller environments. As a result, temporary interruptions to the Bluewave Mini App may occur while components are upgraded, recalibrated, or redeployed throughout the validation process. To ensure every commu…
❤4⚡1
Protocol Update Bluewave Protocol Enters Large-Scale Network Validation Over the past several months, we've been developing and refining the mathematical framework behind Bluewave's Presence Verification Protocol. Following the successful activation of the Genesis Scarcity Mechanism (GSM) and the protocol's first emission adjustment, the next phase is validating the network under production-scale conditions. Over…
❤2🔥1
The best part of today's coming X Space is the roles awards. Recognizing the incredible people who have been building with us every step of the way. Today, we'll be awarding community roles to members who have contributed their time, ideas, creativity, feedback, and unwavering support to the Bluewave ecosystem. Whether you helped test new features, created content, supported the community, or simply showed up cons…
❤1
GM WAVERS One more day for the space the scheduled live space link will be dropped today Drop your questions about the waves in the CS https://x.com/i/status/2080549238832828779
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BWAVE_NEWS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 49,400 of 1,620,105entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“$BWAVE NEWS” (@BWAVE_NEWS), 279 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BWAVE_NEWS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.