2 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 188–189 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Aug 2026, 05:26
188
-1
18 Aug 2026, 14:31
189
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 17 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
18m 24s
Average length
6m 08s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
53 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
29
54.7%
❤🔥
14
26.4%
⚡
4
7.55%
💔
3
5.66%
💯
2
3.77%
😭
1
1.89%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 17 February 2026 to 21 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
با سلام و احترام،
ابتدا جا داره از اعضای انجمن و تمامی دوستان عزیزی که امسال زحمت کشیدند و برای پیشرفت انجمن وقت و انرژی گذاشتند، صمیمانه تشکر و قدردانی کنم.
در این یکی دو روز پیامهای محبت آمیز زیادی از شما دریافت کردم و متوجه شدم خیلی از دوستان پیگیر این موضوع هستند که چرا اسمم در بین کاندیداها نیست..
از این همه لطف و اعتماد شما بسیار ممنونم؛ پیام هاتون انرژی و قوت قلب خیلی زیادی بهم داد.
برای شفافیت اعلام میکنم …
البته که پخت و پز جدید آنتروپیک چیز دیگه ای [بود] و حالا حالا مثلش پیدا نمیشه ..چه فایده که از دستش دادیم 😭💔
https://x.com/i/status/2066545862881206282
کیفیت خروجی ها هم بهبود چشمگیری پیدا کرده مثلا برا اینکه اسلاید بسازه ، قبلا تصویر اگه نیاز بود به کار ببره ، خودش میساخت ولی خب الان اگه تصویری نیاز باشه داخل اسلاید باشه مثل یه تحقیق میره تصویر واقعی هم پیدا میکنه قرار میده و باحال تر شده در کل
https://x.com/i/status/2066391364959342818
راستش درباره این بورسیه MEXT ژاپن یه سری واقعیتها هست که معمولاً گفته نمیشه ..
اول اینکه ظرفیتش بهشدت کمه (کلاً زیر ۵۰ نفر از ایران تاجایی که من اطلاع دارم)
دوم اینکه قبولی ربطی به رزومه خفن نداره؛ فقط بستگی داره اون سال به چه رشتهای نیاز داشته باشن (که اونم هیچوقت نمیگن)
سوم اینکه پروسهاش کاملاً کاغذی و سنتیه..
اگه سر یه اشتباه کوچیک یا حتی بدون دلیل تو هر مرحلهای رد بشید، هیچ توضیحی بهتون نمیدن.
چهارم اینکه …
❗️ نمیدونید برای کارتون از کدوم مدل هوش مصنوعی استفاده کنید؟
💡 رتبهبندی OpenRouter عملکرد مدلهای مختلف رو در بنچمارکهای معتبر کنار هم قرار داده تا مقایسهشون راحتتر باشه.
🔗 https://openrouter.ai/rankings
میتونید مدلها رو در زمینههایی مثل Coding، استدلال، ریاضی و عملکرد کلی بررسی و مقایسه کنید.
⚠️ یادتون باشه: بهترین مدل برای همه وجود نداره؛ انتخاب درست به نیاز شما بستگی داره
+iran core:طبیعتا با فیتلرشکن…
👁️ انویدیا در حال سرمایهگذاری میلیاردی برای جایگزینی کابلهای مسی با فناوری نوری در دیتاسنترهای هوش مصنوعی است!
در ماههای اخیر، این شرکت بیش از ۶.۵ میلیارد دلار به توسعه فوتونیک اختصاص داده است؛ فناوریای که به جای سیگنالهای الکتریکی و سیمهای مسی، داده را با نور منتقل میکند.
بخش زیادی از این هزینه شامل همکاری با شرکتهایی مثل Coherent، Lumentum (۲ میلیارد دلار)، Corning (۳.۲ میلیارد دلار)، Marvell Technology (…
💊 کشف دارو با هوش مصنوعی در چین
چین یک پلتفرم مبتنی بر هوش مصنوعی برای کشف دارو معرفی کرده که فرآیند بررسی مجموعههای بزرگ ترکیبات شیمیایی را بهشدت سرعت میبخشد. این فناوری، زمان غربالگری اولیه داروها را که پیشتر ماهها یا حتی سالها طول میکشید، به چند ثانیه کاهش میدهد !
این پیشرفت، تغییر چشمگیری در جدول زمانی تحقیقات به حساب میآید. ابزارهای مبتنی بر هوش مصنوعی حالا قادرند وظایفی را که پیش از این سالها زمان م…
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @BUT_AI. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 843,822 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BUT AI Channel” (@BUT_AI), 188 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BUT_AI.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
