Channel
@BTTNF88888
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,348subscribers
-75 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001855064762 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BTTNF88888 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BTTNF88888 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:37 | 1,348 | -35 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:52 | 1,383 | -38 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:07 | 1,421 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:18 | 1,423 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (23 June 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 36 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 09:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
#频道互推 #相似推荐 ------------------------------ 📢 开元官方 PG电子 📢 皇冠♥世界杯🎱欧博【改单改中】 📢 亚星🟢欧博🟣利博🔴皇冠【改单改中】 📢 开云体育 雷火体育 雷火电竞 PG电子 AG百家乐 📢 新澳门源头频道 📢 东南亚曝光PG百家乐足球 📢 【so+快搜】博天堂 📢 蓝图娱乐官方频道 📢 缅甸赌场/东南亚/吃瓜日记 📢 澳门威尼斯真人百家乐德州棋牌电子365 ------------------------------ ☁️ 互推入口：@sooo
7月23日 足球联赛推单 欧协联 07/24 02:30 日利纳主队VS客队卡托威斯 尊龙凯时综合分析 由以上分析可知，日利纳这支球队近期的走势起伏较大。此前6场比赛下来，其1胜3平2负的战绩很难让人满意。6战下来，该队的后防失球数多达8粒，防线漏洞较大，其球员作战士气也不高。针对本场比赛，外界初时处在0.25和0的分歧当中，目前则统一到了0的步调上来，对主队的支持明显下滑。而GKS卡托威斯当前则保持了较强的稳定性，具体就客场而言，在上个客场3-1战胜斯塔泽舒夫后，他们已经连续7个客场保持不败，显然本场该队保平争胜的可能性依然不小。 尊龙凯时投注推荐：卡托威斯+0 巴西甲 07/24 06:30 科林蒂安主队VS客队瑞模贝雷 尊龙凯时综合分析 两队近期状态都不错，不过科林蒂安相较于本赛季巴西甲升班马瑞模贝雷而言，名气和实力均占据不小的优势，因此本场对于球队来说初始力度较为合理，后市走势下调进一步降低打出回馈，这对球队来…
世界杯 07/08 00:00 阿根廷主队VS客队埃及 尊龙凯时综合分析 这场绝对是情怀拉满的焦点战,最大看点就是梅西对上萨拉赫,两大传奇迎来世界杯生涯唯一一次、也是最后一次正面交手。早年萨拉赫还有个外号叫埃及梅西,当年欧冠半决赛两人巅峰对垒的场面至今让人难忘,时隔七年再度重逢,境遇却天差地别。梅西身后是整套冠军班底保驾护航, 而萨拉赫基本只能单人匹马扛着整支埃及往前冲。先聊聊卫冕冠军阿根廷,上一轮和佛得角死磕120分钟,3-2险胜过关,这场也暴露了球队一大隐患:一旦率先取得领先,整体节奏容易放缓,后防身后空当很容易被对手抓住打反击。不过斯卡洛尼手里的阵容厚度根本不用愁,梅西本届已经轰入6球,只要他在弧顶、肋部拿球,随时都能制造致命威胁。恩佐搭配麦卡利斯特稳稳把控中场调度,德保罗全场不停逼抢扫荡;后防线罗梅罗、奥塔门迪虽说年纪偏大,但正面对抗、高空防空硬度足够,替补席还躺着冈萨雷斯这类进攻好手,轮换空间充足。另一边埃及队史第一…
世界杯 07/08 04:00 瑞士主队VS客队哥伦比亚 尊龙凯时综合分析 小组赛阶段,瑞士首战对阵卡塔尔一役,全场占尽场面优势,却仅凭借点球取得进球,补时阶段遭卡塔尔扳平,爆出冷门。好在球队调整速度极快,次轮面对实力更强的波黑时,尽管上半场状态平平、未能打开局面,下半场却凭借中场休息后的战术提速与替补阵容带来的冲击力持续施压, 从70分钟起连入四球,最终4-1逆转战胜波黑。末轮面对东道主加拿大队,球队凭借边路的持续冲击与高效反击率先建立优势,再依托下半场的顽强防守守住胜果,最终力克对手,以小组第一身份出线。上场比赛面对实力较弱的阿尔及利亚,球队全场完成11次射门,预期进球高达2.45,最终2-0战胜对手。此役过后,球队终结了连续五场比赛都有失球的颓势,防守端状态明显回暖,零封表现也为后续的强强对话积累了防线信心。小组赛首战面对实力远逊于自己的乌兹别克斯坦,哥伦比亚虽整场占据场面优势,却始终难以将控球优势转化为有效得分,全场1…
世界杯 07/01 01:00 科特迪瓦主队VS客队挪威 尊龙凯时综合分析 主流亚洲初始数据给到挪威-0.5中位数,部分初始数据给到挪威-0.25;基本上是看好挪威有一定的优势:队内而超级明星压阵,主力阵容休息充分体力充沛;虽然承认挪威有优势但是不敢给便宜,0.5的常规说的生死局,只有胜才行;临场数据开放接受资金后,主流数据大多下调至挪威-0.25低位数,有部分则保持-0.5的局面,只是将位数调整到了高位数;这样的变化方法具有比较典型的诱主阻客的趋势,这是常规分析,说明资金去客胜的较多,需要降低给付风险。主流欧洲初始数据给到胜平负区间数(3.40~3.60、3.30~3.50、1.90~2.00),主胜与平的数据相近,换算后基本与亚洲初始数据一致;临场数据开放接受资金后,数据变化是拉高主胜、平基本没变、主负(挪威胜)有稍微调低,基本上从数据上是否定主队爆冷、对90分钟内平局有所防范、看好挪威取胜。主流数据给2.5球,大的数据处…
世界杯 07/01 05:00 法国主队VS客队瑞典 尊龙凯时综合分析 主流亚洲初始数据给到法国-1.25中低位数,部分初始数据给到法国-1.5低位数,主流意见初步认为:法国硬实力明显强过瑞典,而且法国攻击强悍(3场进10球)、瑞典防守较差(3场丢7 球),法国赢球没有问题,但是对于是否能打穿净胜2球以上保留意见。临场数据开放接受资金后,基本都提升为法国-1.75中高位数,法国受热明显,调低瑞典+1.75的低位数分流部分资金压力。这种变化是明显的诱主阻客,法国虽然实力强,但是太热!这种数据一出,往往就是冷门温床,你能想象法国在16/1比赛中被瑞典淘汰吗?这绝对是目前为止的最大冷门!这样的数据变化, 明明的预告冷门,但是想想法国的实力,又有点犹豫,上一场基本同样是数据,由于挪威排出了替补阵容而让法国4:1打出,这次法国应该很有可能赢了球输数据,也有可能被逼平甚至爆冷。主流欧洲初始数据胜平负数据区间给到(1.30~1.33、5.0…
世界杯 06/30 09:00 荷兰主队VS客队摩洛哥 尊龙凯时综合分析 主流欧洲初始胜、平、负数据区间给到(2.08~2.15、3.10~3.25、3.40~3.60),主流初始数据换算后基本与亚洲数据相符,表示主流初始数据的看法基本一致,荷兰有优势但是胜的信心并不是很足;临场数据开放接受资金后,胜数基本是持平小升(数据并没有压低,表示主胜的热度比较低);平数小降并控制在3.20之内(表示对于平局的防范较强);主负的数据有小幅拉升,但是幅度非常小(表示对客队不败的认可度较高)。这样变化也是有比较明显的诱客意图。主流初始数据给到2.25小低大高的局面,有小部分初始数据给了2.5大低小高的局面;由于摩洛哥大概率摆大巴5-4-1低位防守,荷兰的阵地战办法也并不多,主流数据基本比较看好少球区间;1-2球应该是主力的看好局面。 尊龙凯时投注推荐：荷兰-0.25
世界杯 06/30 04:30 德国主队VS客队巴拉圭 尊龙凯时综合分析 两队此前两次正赛级交手全部跑出大格局赛果,友谊赛打出3比3对攻比分、世青杯对局也有进球产出,双方碰面很难出现零进球、极低比分的闷战格局,从往绩规律来看,本场具备天然的进球上涨基础。德国主打高位逼抢、全员压上进攻的战术,边后卫频繁前插助攻,后场必然留出反击空档;巴拉圭放弃控球专注防守反击,断球后直奔对手边路空当突击,一方主动强攻、一方伺机偷袭破门,双向进攻模式会持续制造射门得分机会,双方都有稳定破门,不容易双双哑火。 尊龙凯时投注推荐：全场进球大2.5
世界杯 06/30 01:00 巴西主队VS客队日本 尊龙凯时综合分析 主流亚洲初始数据给到巴西-0.75中高位数,基本上看好巴西实力占优,但是这样赢1球赢一半,打平全输的局面,是不太相信巴西能打穿数据赢到2球以上,所以并没有给出-1的较深数据。 临场接受资金后主流数据基本都维持在巴西-0.75中高位数,这样的变化基本是诱主阻客而方法。欧洲初始数据的均值给到(1.70~1.75、3.35~3.60、4.50~5.00),临场接受资金后胜负微微上调,而平则稍微下调;主流意见虽然还是认可巴西获胜,但是有考虑日本有爆冷的历史,而且还有逼平荷兰、瑞典的韧性,对于法定时间内的平局有所防范。进球初始数据给到2.5球,大位中高、小位微低持平;2.5的基本表达是虽然看好双方的进攻能力,而且巴西两场都以3:0取胜,日本的进攻力也不容小觑,但是大中小的概率都有,比较看好2-3 球。 尊龙凯时投注推荐：巴西-0.75
世界杯 06/25 06:00 摩洛哥主队VS客队海地 尊龙凯时综合分析 摩洛哥作为非洲劲旅，相较于海地来说，名气和实力均占据不小的优势，在本届世界杯表现又更好的情况下，本场摩洛哥备受关注，外界也顺势以球队较深数据起步进行造势，后市数据提升持续示好，这对球队来说十分不利。 尊龙凯时投注推荐：海地+2
世界杯 06/25 03:00 波黑主队VS客队卡塔尔 尊龙凯时综合分析 主流亚洲初始数据都给到波黑-0.75中位,开放受资后,一路提升到-1.25,有些意见甚至给到了波黑-1.5;欧洲数据也很配合,采取了同样的变化方法;进球数方面也是从2.25提升到了3或者 3.25,感觉数据都很正常。嘉嘉综合分析认为:结合波黑前两场的表现,0.75至1.5是太高看波黑了,卡塔尔虽然是亚洲球队;但是架不住有资啊,实力其实并不弱;打法上也是灵活传控,正好克制波黑的后防,只要能抗住了波黑的前期攻势,也并不是没有取胜的机会;嘉嘉看好本场卡塔尔爆冷,就算是输,也不会大败。 尊龙凯时投注推荐：卡塔尔+1.5
世界杯 06/25 06:00 苏格兰主队VS客队巴西 尊龙凯时综合分析 巴西为锁定小组头名必将全力进攻,内马尔复出后前场创造力显着提升,维尼修斯两战皆有进球,其边路突破能力恰好针对苏格兰右路软肋主力右后卫希基因伤缺席,顶替的甘农-多克经验不足,此侧恐成巴西重点突破口。苏格兰虽主打防反,但末轮打平即出线,战术上未必一味死守,罗伯逊与蒂尔尼的边路插上同样具备威胁,加上定位球争顶能力不俗,球队完全有取得进球的机会。巴西防线在首战被摩洛哥逼平时也曾暴露空当,苏格兰并非毫无可乘之机。两队均有明确的进球诉求,攻防转换节奏预计较快。综合实力差距与战意驱动,看好全场总进球大于 2.5球。 尊龙凯时投注推荐：全场大2.5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BTTNF88888. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 264,099 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PA集团 尊龙凯时 918博天堂 尊龙凯发 PG电子” (@BTTNF88888), 1,348 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BTTNF88888.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.