4 Aug 2022, 08:59 UTC≈2,270 viewsread 6 August 2026
Check out this free app — It Pays to Walk 🚶 https://sweatco.in/i/mariamkhaled88438044408
Signed mariam ❤
Channel
BTS
@BTS_for_us
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
291subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001370420398 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BTS_for_us |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BTS_for_us |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 11:38 | 291 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:47 | 295 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:29 | 295 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 11 July 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
9 Mar 2022, 15:28 UTC≈3,630 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo
جيونكوك نشر صوره ل يونغي بمناسبه عيد ميلاده علي الانستاغرام
Signed mariam ❤
9 Mar 2022, 11:54 UTC≈3,270 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed mariam ❤
23 Nov 2021, 05:22 UTC≈4,800 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed mariam ❤
6 Nov 2021, 18:29 UTC≈4,560 viewsread 6 August 2026
Jin demonstrates a perfect pitch in his random singing covers in ... https://www.allkpop.com/article/2021/11/jin-demonstrates-a-perfect-pitch-in-his-random-singing-covers-in-btss-entertainment-shows
Signed mariam ❤
9 Oct 2021, 22:00 UTC≈4,630 viewsread 6 August 2026
BTS: V makes HISTORY by being voted the most handsome man in the world for the second year in a row - Music ... https://www.musicmundial.com/en/2021/10/07/bts-v-makes-history-by-being-voted-the-most-handsome-man-in-the-world-for-the-second-year-in-a-row/
Signed mariam jimin
4 Oct 2021, 23:20 UTC≈4,110 viewsread 6 August 2026
BTS: 5 Iconic Moments That Prove RM Is The Most Deserving Of The Title ‘Leader Of BTS’ https://www.iwmbuzz.com/music/celebrities-music/bts-5-iconic-moments-that-prove-rm-is-the-most-deserving-of-the-title-leader-of-bts/2021/10/04
Signed mariam ❤
4 Oct 2021, 23:19 UTC≈3,570 viewsread 6 August 2026
BTS: Suga teases V as he works out on sets, Jimin impressed with singer's toned physique https://www.hindustantimes.com/entertainment/music/bts-suga-teases-v-as-he-works-out-on-sets-jimin-impressed-with-singer-s-toned-physique-101633106624026.html
Signed mariam ❤
2 Oct 2021, 04:28 UTC≈3,270 viewsread 6 August 2026
Bang Si Hyuk's HYBE stock holdings are worth 6x the Big 3 founders combined https://www.allkpop.com/article/2021/09/bang-si-hyuks-hybe-stock-holdings-are-worth-6x-the-big-3-founders-combined
Signed mariam ❤
2 Oct 2021, 04:27 UTC≈2,980 viewsread 6 August 2026
BTS V's impact helped 'Itaewon Class' become the 2nd most mentioned K-Drama worldwide on Twitter https://www.allkpop.com/article/2021/10/bts-vs-impact-helped-itaewon-class-become-the-2nd-most-mentioned-k-drama-worldwide-on-twitter
Signed mariam ❤
8 Sept 2021, 11:04 UTC≈3,340 viewsread 6 August 2026
https://youtu.be/oKBLxJ_hccc
Signed mariam ❤
29 Aug 2021, 14:20 UTC≈3,570 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed mariam ❤
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @BTS_for_us. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,273,629 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BTS” (@BTS_for_us), 291 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BTS_for_us.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.